Jewish World Review July 9, 1999 /25 Tamuz, 5759
Bubba goes native
PRESIDENT CLINTON VISITED an Indian reservation the other day to remind us how morally superior he is to nearly all of his
predecessors. No doubt the apology for Wounded Knee will be forthcoming. The president loves to preen by apologizing for
the sins of others -- it's his own sins that leave him tongue-tied.
Anyway, speaking at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in
South Dakota, home to the Oglala Sioux tribe, the president noted: "No American president has been anywhere in Indian
country since Franklin Roosevelt was president. That is wrong, and we're trying to fix it today."
One question: Is it
politically correct to say "Indian country"? Admittedly, "Native American country" offends the ear, but the p.c. crowd -- the
folks who brought you "chairperson" and "differently abled" -- have never let that stop them. Bill Clinton is p.c. What gives?
Perhaps Clinton's predecessors ought to have found the time to visit a reservation, but far better for the Indians would be for
this or any president to correctly analyze their plight. The president, face-to-face with some of the worst poverty in America
(unemployment on the Pine Ridge reservation is 72 percent), urged the Sioux to cultivate the Internet, promising that, if they
acquire the skills, "we can get the jobs to come here." The president is also hawking a basket of new tax credits, loan
guarantees and other incentives to lure business to the reservations.
None of that will succeed. With no disrespect intended
toward American Indians, it would be pouring good money after bad.
Let's clear the decks about history. It is a simple
fact of life that European civilization contended with Indian civilization for dominion over this patch of North America and the
Indians were vanquished. It is inarguable that along the way, terrible atrocities were committed on both sides, and many a
treaty was broken by the United States.
But white guilt over that history has harmed modern Indians, not helped them.
In fact, Indian reservations are little laboratories of liberalism -- cautionary tales about the effects of too much benevolence.
For years, but particularly since the 1960s and '70s when the Indian cause became chic, the U.S. government has lavished
freebies on Indian reservations. Hendrik Mills, writing in the November/December American Enterprise magazine, described
the cornucopia available to reservation Indians: free health care (including dentistry) with no co-payments, extra education
funds, tribal colleges complete with full scholarships and living expenses, exemption from many local and state taxes, Head
Start, loads of free food, and -- of course -- welfare.
Mills, who was drawn to the reservation initially by leftist idealism,
was appalled to see the unopened packages of fruit juice, canned fruit, macaroni, soup, rice and beans -- most with
Department of Agriculture stamps -- rotting in local dumps. He was shocked that many Indian parents effectively have made
their children orphans by failing to provide the most basic care. And he was disillusioned to discover that many Indians wait
for the government check to come on the first of the month and then blow it all at the casino.
There are exceptions, of
course. Southern reservations have fewer alcohol problems than Northern ones, and many Indians do lead productive,
orderly lives. But the overall state of Indian reservations is one of poverty, decay and despair. Alcohol has ravaged the
reservations. According to Alcohol Health and Research World, the alcohol-related death rate among Indians in 1992 was
5.6 times greater than among the U.S. population in general. Alcohol-related fatal car accidents are three times as prevalent;
alcohol-related homicide is 2.4 times higher; and fetal alcohol syndrome is 4.5 times higher than among the general
population. Among juvenile Indians who drink, those who live on reservations tend to drink more heavily.
The answer to
what ails the reservations is probably exactly the reverse of what President Clinton is recommending. It is an end to the dole;
an end to paternalism. If we continue to "help" in the way we've been doing for decades, we may soon have no Indians
JWR contributor Mona Charen reads all of her mail. Let her know what you think by clicking here. Please bear in mind, though, that while all letters are read, due to the heavy amount of traffic, not all letters can be answered.
07/07/99: Is Rev. Al Hillary's new pal?
07/01/99: Free Sara Jane Olson?
06/23/99: Behind the George W. frenzy
06/23/99: How to avoid Mediscare
06/21/99: Taking back our streets
06/16/99: Hide and seek
06/14/99: Impervious to the evidence
06/09/99: Unsung heroes
06/01/99: For $ale
05/26/99: Best friend these girls ever had
05/24/99: Baby Hope continued
05/20/99: Say no to the Gore tax
05/17/99: Baby Hope
05/13/99: Other high crimes
05/10/99:Three cheers for uniforms
05/05/99: Voucher opponents' worst nightmare
05/03/99: Lessons of Columbine High
04/28/99: Kevorkian is stopped
04/26/99: "Senseless tragedy"?
04/22/99: Hey, hey, ... Bubba
04/19/99: Why we are in Kosovo
04/15/99: Hooray for the NYPD
04/09/99: How to do something about taxes
04/06/99:Can the private sector handle foster care?
03/31/99: The Flower Child goes to war
03/29/99: Foreign-policy meltdown
03/25/99: 'Just doin' it'
03/22/99: Return of pay equity?
03/16/99: St. Hillary
03/10/99: Rodney King in perspective
03/08/99: Monica's story: No morals
03/04/99: Not home but library alone:
3/02/99: Tuning our racial sensitivities
2/27/99: Cease-fire in war between sexes?
2/23/99: Where were the religious voices?
2/19/99: Depends what you mean by "acting"
2/17/99: As Minn., goes so goes the nation?
2/09/99: Prepare for post-impeachment spin
2/03/99: Teaching morality
2/01/99: What did he say?
1/26/99: The truth about the Peace Process
1/22/99: The vulgar decade
1/19/99: Was Jefferson libeled by DNA?
1/13/99: The backlash picks up speed
1/11/99: Who invented politics of personal destruction?
1/07/99: Shall we dance?
1/05/99: Try him!
12/30/98: The price of virtue
12/28/98: The gift of giving
12/22/98: Party of shame, party of shamelessness
12/18/98: Wag the country
12/16/98: Is this impeachment constitutional?
12/14/98: Republicans find courage
12/09/98: Nappy Hair and other racial slurs
12/07/98: Stranger in a strange land
12/02/98: Dangerous ground
11/30/98: Involuntary fatherhood?
11/24/98: Lies, damned lies, and sex lies
11/18/98: Another victory for cowardice
11/16/98: Separatism plus welfarism equals a dead end
11/10/98: Did conservatism lose campaign '98?
11/06/98: Democrat venality, Republican timidity
11/04/98: Are girls being shortchanged?
11/02/98: Believe the children?
10/28/98: What 'Measure 58' would do
10/26/98: The officers are bailing out
10/20/98: Using Matthew Shepard's murder
10/19/98: The school voucher that saved a family
10/14/98: Are powerful women different?
10/09/98: Can just sex be impeachable?
10/07/98: Repeal Miranda
10/02/98: Understanding the polls
10/01/98: What school texts teach about marriage
9/28/98: Fear of choice
9/23/98: A fork in the road: Bubba's fate and ours
9/18/98: Christianity and the Holocaust
9/16/98: The national dirty joke
9/11/98: Are we in crisis?
9/09/98: Does Burton's sin let Clinton off the hook?
9/07/98: Liar's Poker
9/01/98: One, two, three
8/28/98: Fat and folly
8/25/98: When homework is a dirty word
8/21/98: The unravelling
8/18/98: The wages of dishonesty
8/17/98: Sex, honor and the presidency
8/12/98: Pro-choice extremist
8/10/98: Switch illuminates biology's role
8/05/98: The presumption of innocence and the American way
8/03/98: An American hero
7/29/98: Lock up those who need psychiatric care
7/24/98: Making the military more like us
7/22/98: The 'Net sex hoax... and us
7/20/98: Disappointed by Cosbys
7/15/98: Feelings, not morality, rule
7/10/98: Guns as the solution?
7/8/98: Teacher preacher
7/6/98: The China behind the headlines
7/1/98: What is the First Amendment for?
6/26/98: The Republican city
6/24/98: Poison pen
6/22/98: Clinton: inventing his own reality?
6/16/98: Senator mom?
6/12/98: Wisconsin: a trail blazer?
6/9/98: These girls say no to sex, yes to excellence
6/5/98: Lewinsky's ex-lawyer would feel right at home as Springer guest
6/2/98: English? Si; Republican? No!
5/29/98: The truth about women and work
5/27/98: Romance in the '90s
5/25/98:Taxing smokers for fun and profit
5/19/98: China's friend in the White House
5/15/98: Look out feminists: here comes the true backlash
5/12/98: The war process?
5/8/98: Where's daddy?
5/5/98: The joys of boys
5/1/98: Republicans move on education reform
4/28/98: Reagan was right
4/24/98: The key to Pol Pot
4/21/98: The patriot's channel
4/19/98: Child-care day can't replace mom
4/15/98: Tax time
4/10/98: Armey states obvious, gets clobbered
4/7/98: A nation complacent?
4/1/98: Bill Clinton's African adventure
3/27/98: Understanding Arkansas
3/24/98: Jerry Springer's America
3/20/98: A small step for persecuted minorities
3/17/98: Skeletons in every closet?
3/13/98: Clinton's idea of a fine judge
3/10/98: Better than nothing?
3/6/98: Of fingernails and freedom
3/3/98: Read JWR! :0)
2/27/98: Dumb and Dumber
2/24/98: Reagan reduced poverty more than Clinton
2/20/98: Rally Round the United Nations?
2/17/98: In Denial
2/13/98: Reconsidering Theism
2/10/98: Waiting for the facts?
2/8/98: Cat got the GOP's tongue?
2/2/98: Does America care about immorality?
1/30/98: How to judge Clinton's denials
1/27/98: What If It's Just the Sex?
1/23/98: Bill Clinton, Acting Guilty
1/20/98: Arafat and the Holocaust Museum
1/16/98: Child Care or Feminist Agenda?
1/13/98: What We Really Think of Abortion
1/9/98: The Dead Era of Budget Deficits Rises Again?
1/6/98: "Understandable" Murder and Child Custody
1/2/98: Majoring in Sex
12/30/97: The Spirit of Kwanzaa
12/26/97: Food fights (Games children play)
12/23/97: Does Clinton's race panel listen to facts?
12/19/97: Welcome to the Judgeocracy, where the law school elite overrules majority rule
12/16/97: Do America's Jews support Netanyahu?
©1999, Creators Syndicate