Jewish World Review April 5, 2002 / 24 Nisan, 5762
Debra J. Saunders
No justice in reparations
Is victimhood in America so endless that it survives beyond death, passing from one generation to the next? The answer will be yes, if a lawsuit filed in a New York federal court succeeds.
The suit, filed by Deadria Farmer-Paellmann on behalf of herself and other descendants of slaves, seeks reparations from three companies -- FleetBoston, Aetna and CSX -- because they profited from slavery before it was outlawed in 1865.
The three companies, the lawsuit reads, "conspired with slave traders, with each other, and with entities and institutions (whose identities are not yet specifically identified, but which are herein described as Corporate Does No. 1-100) and other unnamed entities and-or financial institutions to commit and-or knowingly facilitate crimes against humanity, and to further illicitly profit from slave labor."
What about the statute of limitations, which might be three years in a civil case? The plaintiffs' attorney, Ed Fagan, answered that because targeted companies never "disgorged" slave-related profits, the wrongdoing hasn't ended.
Also, for some civil cases, the statute of limitations begins after a victim obtains the knowledge needed to sue someone. Some two years ago, after Farmer-Paellmann made inquiries, Aetna found evidence that it issued 16 slave insurance policies. Aetna released the information and apologized. (The policies don't paint a pretty picture, as Aetna wouldn't pay for the death of slaves who were lynched, worked to death or committed suicide.) Fagan argued that the statute of limitations clock started running when Aetna released that information.
George Washington University law professor and JWR columnist Jonathan Turley noted that to collect damages for slavery, "You have to be the direct victim of an enslaving act." Fagan says no: "It's not a claim that it's predicated on, 'You did this directly to me.' It's, 'You were part of a broad conspiracy, the object of the conspiracy was the enslavement of individuals.'"
According to the lawsuit, practically every U.S. corporation -- read: "Corporate Does" and "unnamed entities" -- doing business before 1865 or that bought a business operating before 1865, benefited from cheap slave labor -- to the tune of $1.4 trillion in present-day dollars. Which means almost every American with a pension or stocks -- including African Americans -- could be liable for reparations.
It's so un-American. The punishment fits someone else's crime. And the money won in court or in settlements wouldn't even go to slave descendants. Checks would not be sent to individuals, Fagan noted; the money would go into a humanitarian fund for African-Americans. Are you going to sue newspapers? "No comment," said Fagan. Then, "I laugh because everyone wants to know if we're going after the newspapers."
That's because some publishers have found that their newspaper, or papers they purchased, profited from slave advertising, and rightly apologized. The Hearst Corp., which writes my paycheck, didn't know if Hearst papers ever ran slave ads. "Your call is the first call I've received on the topic," said a spokesman.
Normally, I'd suggest that the Hearst suits check and, if Hearst Corp. did profit from slavery, that it issue an apology. But this lawsuit provides companies with a reason not to look to see if their history is tarnished with the ugly profits of bondage, depravation and misery. It tells companies to burn their archives lest they provide fodder for a lawsuit.
The suit also mentions universities. The taint is everywhere.
The taint is everywhere without a lawsuit, because slavery leaves its woeful mark on the American soul. With a lawsuit, the taint of slavery is everywhere, and it's followed by a new injustice -- a very small group of African Americans loudly proclaiming that they are victims of centuries-old sins and demanding money for damages they didn't suffer from people who had nothing to do with slavery.
That's not justice. It's not even
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
04/01/02: Schools, yes; fat police, no
03/25/02: The government-induced doctor shortage
03/22/02: Conservative hypocrisy on school drug testing?
03/20/02: And now, about Russell Yates . . .
03/18/02: Bush isn't worried about alienating loyalist voters
03/13/02: No exit strategy
03/11/02: Simon hits the big time
03/06/02: He got away
03/01/02: Mary, Luke, Paul, John and Noah
02/25/02: These are good days for veep
02/21/02: Dirty bill for a dirty mess
02/19/02: Score one for Greta
02/15/02: Dose of justice needed here
02/08/02: Sunshine all around
02/04/02: Does citizenship matter?
02/01/02: End the coverup
01/30/02: Try this for "troubling"
01/25/02: Camp X-ray or Club Med?
01/23/02: Let's stop the deluge of porn e-mail
01/21/02: No 'Little Boy Lost'
01/16/02: Son of Supercar
01/12/02: Beware the European view of the death penalty
01/09/02: Other people's children
01/07/02: It doesn't fly
01/03/02: Going from the Atlantic City Boardwalk to Berkeley
12/31/01: In America, punishment should fit the crime
12/28/01: What I'd like to see in 2002
12/24/01: Don't heckle ink monopolists
12/21/01: Mumia finds safety in numbers
12/19/01 The self-help PBS shopping network
12/17/01 Caught on tape
12/14/01 Know when to hold 'em
12/10/01 Old friends
12/06/01 I read the news today, oh boy
12/03/01 It's not cricket
11/28/01 Admissions and omissions
11/26/01 Guns and abayas
11/21/01 Depraved minds think alike
11/19/01 Guilty, a la carte
11/14/01 Interpreting the entrails of Election 2000
11/12/01 Life and liberty
11/09/01 Safety is as safety does
11/07/01 More hot air on global warming
11/05/01 Bumped Pakistani's molehill
11/01/01 Freedom snuffed out
10/29/01 Give war a chance
10/26/01 Airline bill needs liftoff
10/22/01 The Riordan Principle
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders
12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?
© 2000, Creators Syndicate