Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review July 13, 2001 / 22 Tamuz, 5761

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The catalog has no clothes -- WHY would a clothing store try to sell clothes by showing pictures of naked people? The new Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly publication -- available at A&F stores for $6 if you have an ID that proves you are age 18 or older -- begs the question.

Co-workers haven't spent the last two days moseying up to my cubicle to get a look at the crew mesh shorts. No, they came to sneak peeks at the photos of beautiful young bodies, completely nude, or in mid-striptease or mid-ravishment. It's a quasi-catalog for a clothing store most notable for the models lack of clothing.

"Restricting the sales of written and visual material to persons at least 18 years of age is appropriate for those in the business of selling pornography," GOP Illinois Lt. Gov. Corinne Wood wrote to Abercrombie & Flesh -- uh, Fitch -- CEO Michael Jeffries last month. "It should not be necessary for a clothing retailer."

Indeed, Wood has been spearheading an A&F boycott because the group pushes "promiscuous" and group sex to sell clothes. She tells parents, "You shouldn't shop at a store that is marketing sexual imagery to your young children." She's not pushing for laws to ban sale of the catalog. She simply says parents should withhold family dollars until A&F stops promoting sex to sell clothes.

If you feel the media are bombarding your kids with oversexualized messages, here is a place to take a stand.

A&F spokesman Hampton Carney takes offense at Wood's assertions. A&F is careful to not sell the quarterly publication to minors, he said. Catalogs in stores are wrapped so that they "can't be casually flipped through in the store."

Carney complained that Wood is trying to interfere with A&F's marketing strategy -- which is to hype adult imagery for the 18-to-21 crowd, while two sister stores peddle tamer stuff to high-school students and the 7- to 14-year-old market. "What we're trying to do is sell the image of our brand to our customer," he argued.

He said of the nudity: "It's all part of the college experience. It's like a rite of passage." You know, streaking, UC Berkeley's naked guy.

Of course, if A&F has the right to choose its own marketing strategy, parents have the right to choose their own spending strategies.

Wood doesn't buy this argument that A&F works hard to shield kids from its sex-as-marketing-tool publication. Of course, all this skin rubs off on them. Wood has talked to kids who have seen the quarterly -- including, she said, her own. That's when she first called for a boycott of A&F.

What especially galls her are photos featuring group nudity. The latest rag shows three strapping young bucks in the buff chasing after a nude nymph with a football. There are several shots of a braless young woman who strips down to her underpants and shirt in front of two guys and a pizza.

"What kind of message is my teen-age daughter getting?" Wood asked. "That it's OK to jump into bed? With four other girls and a boy?"

And the quarterly certainly doesn't get into some of the consequences -- heartache, date rape, pregnancy. That's why local National Organization for Women activists and the Illinois Coalition of Sexual Assault have assisted the boycott. (See

What about parents who will say that it is impossible to stop their kids from buying A&F's high-priced clothes?

"It's time for them to start being parents," answered Wood. "As parents, we have responsibilities."

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate