Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review Oct. 12, 2001 / 25 Tishrei, 5762

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

University of Censorship's
fall semester -- GEORGE ORWELL would have loved UC Berkeley student senate bill 67. Its first and second versions begin praising Berkeley as "a place of light where the rights of individuals with difference are appreciated and honest, probing inquiry is encouraged."

Also: "Berkeley remains one of the few places in the world where a thoughtful, critical exchange can occur from people across a spectrum of backgrounds and races, without fear of reprisal or hatred."

But, in an exercise of left-wing censorship, a version of the bill introduced last week recommended that a student board raise the $8,000-per- month rent of the Daily Californian in retaliation of the student newspaper refusing to be intimidated into running a front-page apology for a Darrin Bell political cartoon it ran Sept. 18.

The cartoon showed two turbaned terrorists ready to "meet Allah and be fed grapes," but finding themselves instead burning in hell. Bill co-author Sajid Khan believes the cartoon was "racist." (I disagree. The cartoon clearly lampoons a vicious fanatical mind-set that equates slaughtering innocents with martyrdom and eternal reward.)

The newspaper could avoid a rent increase, the bill explained, if it adopted "voluntary diversity training." (Doublespeak lives in the misuse of the words "voluntary" -- when the bill says submit or pay -- and "diversity" -- when only popular opinions will be tolerated.) Also, the paper could "rectify its complete insensitivity to the needs of its campus and its values" with "a printed apology, and a new record of dedication to truth in editorial and news content."

The student censors speak out of both sides of their mouths, then demand truth.

After big-name cartoonists scolded the students, a committee amended the bill by removing the extortionate threat. Said co-author Tony Falcone, "You know, looking at the original bill, it did reek of fascism." And: "I think we screwed up big time."

They screwed up big time again. The allegedly coersion-free bill, 67A, asks the Daily Cal to subject all staff members to "mandatory" -- yes, mandatory -- "sensitivity training."

"We are open to removing that word," Khan explained yesterday. Perhaps they did during a Senate vote Wednesday night after my deadline. Or maybe they didn't.

While the ideologically straitjacketed see but one way to address the terrorist attacks, the Daily Cal understood true public debate: After the Daily Cal ran the Bell cartoon, it printed a number of complaints from students who objected to the cartoon. Thus, both sides of the issue were widely aired.

Why wasn't an airing of both sides good enough?

Answered Khan: "They didn't seem to have concern for the safety of the students, their readers."

He explained, "The cartoon, we felt, perpetuated the kind of ignorance that would lead to harassment."

Does it not occur to you, I asked, that maybe the Sept. 11 attacks spawn stupid hate crimes, and not a cartoon? Khan didn't want to go there, other than to say cartoons can have a cumulative effect. Falcone answered, "I don't think that the cartoon would set people off but it contributes to the wrong environment." So even one author doesn't believe his own rhetoric.

Student senator and bill opponent Daniel Frankenstein has a clearer take on the issue: "The people who preach tolerance become the most intolerant when you disagree with them."

Daily Cal Editor Janny Hu, to her credit, won't back down: "We maintain that the editorial cartoon fell within the realm of fair comment and the First Amendment." In the spring, her predecessor Daniel Hernandez caved in to heavy- handed demands for a formal apology over an ad the paper ran on slavery reparations. Hu believes Hernandez's cave-in may have stoked this month's heavy-handedness. So students can see another example of how appeasement invites more aggression.

Meanwhile, if Falcone or Kahn want to sue UC Berkeley for failing to provide them with a sound education, I'll write an affidavit. They clearly have not learned how a free society works.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate