Jewish World Review Oct. 26, 2001 / 9 Mar-Cheshvan, 5762
Debra J. Saunders
Airline bill needs liftoff
"FEDERAL doesn't mean quality,'' a House Republican aide said to explain why House Repubs oppose a bill passed unanimously by the Senate that would federalize some 28,000 airport security jobs.
OK. Problem is: Private doesn't mean quality, either.
Consider a federal review of airport security biggie Argenbright Security Inc. The company hired security screeners with criminal records -- folks convicted for burglary, firearms possession and other crimes -- as well as illegal aliens. Last year, Argenbright pleaded guilty to several charges and agreed to pay $1.2 million in fines for falsifying records and conducting inadequate personnel background checks.
Last year, the General Accounting Office presented the findings of an investigation to see if undercover workers using bogus credentials could get into the secured areas of two airports with private security. Bingo. The phony IDs got GAO personnel and their valises -- which could have contained anything -- through security without screening.
An airport's motto should not be: Have gun, will travel.
The other problem is: Federal workers don't guarantee security either. GAO personnel also made it past guards without being screened at FBI headquarters and at the Department of Energy, where federal workers provide security. The workers and their valises were even able to get close to the energy secretary's and FBI director's office suites.
What to do?
First, understand that both systems are flawed, and both have their advantages. Then pass the best bill you can get, pronto.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., believes that the public will only feel secure flying with the federal government providing airport security. Since confidence translates into ticket-buying, that's an important point.
House Republicans cite the success of private airport security companies operating under tough government scrutiny in Europe and Israel. House Transportation Committee Chairman Don Young therefore introduced a bill that would make the federal government responsible for airport security, but let the president decide whether to require airport security personnel to be federal workers. President Bush supports it.
Young, however, would enjoy more credibility if the National Journal had not reported that, after Young was called to a vote during a press conference on his bill, he referred reporters to direct their questions to the counsel for the Aviation Security Association, the industry lobby. His bill reeks of Eau de Bad Airline Security Bailout.
At SFO International, spokesman Ron Wilson said he would like to see a rise in worker pay nationwide. Before San Francisco raised wages to start at $10 per hour, Wilson explained, many screeners were working more than one job; they'd come to work bone tired. Higher wages at other airports would improve performance and reduce job turnover.
The House bill doesn't raise pay. And what Wilson didn't like about the Senate bill was that by federalizing security, "You may be putting a lot of people out of work.''
The most important element could be speed. Until the public is confident about flying, the airlines, airports, workers and related industries will suffer. Ditto the nation's economy. The Senate has acted. The House has not. If House Repubs can't muster the votes to maintain a privately contracted workforce, but under beefed-up federal oversight and training -- they should pass the Senate bill, which would require hiring federal workers.
Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., has been pushing for a mostly private workforce, but he'd rather vote to federalize the workforce than pass no bill. He explained, "The goal here is to be safe, not the philosophical position.''
Hope that the aptly named GOP House Whip Tom DeLay is
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
10/22/01The Riordan Principle
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders
12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?
© 2000, Creators Syndicate