Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review March 9, 2001 / 14 Adar, 5761

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Free speech dies in Berkeley -- Now you know what the UC in UC Berkeley stands for: University of Censorship.

Last week, UC Berkeley's student-run paper, the Daily Californian, ran an ad, "Ten Reasons Why Reparations for Slavery Is a Bad Idea -- and Racist Too," written by JWR columnist and author David Horowitz. Leftist activists promptly protested the paper's decision to run the ad. They stormed the paper with a list of demands, including that the paper "hire a person to review the paper for offensive racial context," that it run "two formal apologies" with photos of members of the paper's board and staff, that it run photos of students opposed to the ad, and that it run 10 columns, each rebutting one of Horowitz's 10 points.

Then, like good little Brownshirts, the activists stole all the remaining papers from their racks. It is a sorry commentary on how much students have become used to the censorious acts of the student Left that the Daily Cal didn't even report that activists stole copies of the paper in order to keep other students from being exposed to opinions with which the activists disagree.

When asked why the theft didn't make the paper's story, editor Daniel Hernandez replied, "There are a couple things in the story that we could have added." (No kidding.)

Daily Cal editors should have told the activists that they would run an opinion piece taking the content of Horowitz to task -- but not if the mob stole the papers. In the piece, activists could challenge some of the ad's more offensive statements, such as that welfare benefits constituted a transfer payment to African Americans. (More whites than blacks are on welfare.) Best to fight offensive speech, not by muzzling dissent, but with counterspeech.

But the Daily Cal ran a formal apology. Hernandez wrote a letter to readers that noted that the ad contained "incorrect or blatantly inflammatory content." He said the paper's staff should have vetted the ad. And added, "I promise readers it will not happen again."

But the ad was not "blatantly inflammatory." Horowitz did not use the crude bomb-throwing lingo the paper's liberal columnists find so handy. Nor was the ad incorrect; it was a documented matter of opinion.

"This whole thing has brought a mirror to our faces," said a wary Hernandez.

The mirror shows something downright unjournalistic about the Daily Cal. As Berkeley College Republicans Chairman Robb McFadden noted, "Unfortunately, it seems like freedom of speech at Berkeley only applies to those who don't stray from the liberal line of thought. I'll be the first to admit that I do not agree with all of the things that Mr. Horowitz said in his advertisement, but I cherish the fact that in America he has the right to say them."

Yes, in America he has the right to say them. But not in UC Berkeley.

Quoth Horowitz, "Even in the McCarthy era, Communists could buy ad space in a college newspaper."

This nasty episode makes one ache for the education student activists clearly are missing.

They know too little history. They don't appreciate the First Amendment, or understand the ugly consequences that can occur when people with power try to dictate what other people say and think. They have a glorious window to the world of knowledge, yet they prefer to spend their time telling other people what they can't write, or can't read.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate