Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review Dec. 3, 2001 / 18 Kislev, 5762

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

It's not cricket -- LONDON -- Prime Minister Tony Blair is having a tougher time getting Parliament to pass his anti-terror bill than President George W. Bush had to get Congress to pass his anti-terrorism bill.

Blair has had to deal with pols such as House of Commons Leader Charles Kennedy, a Liberal Democrat, who complained to the London Independent that if Brits "allow ourselves to get into a situation where in fact we are suppressing our own individual rights, actually the terrorist begins to win."

(Sure -- the terrorists win if the Brits pass laws making it harder for terrorists to cook up a plan to kill civilians.)

Kennedy wants a bill that "recognizes the proper rights of the citizen." Nice try, old chap, but Blair's bill would allow for detention without trial only for "foreign nationals" -- that is, non-citizens -- believed to have conspired in plots to kill people or commit an act of terror. Also, detention without trial would be limited to bad actors who can't be deported to their country of origin because they might be killed or tortured.

Indeed, a provision would allow detained foreign citizens to leave if they wanted to go to some no-taste country that agreed to take them. That ought to be the provision against which critics rail -- it's an escape clause for would-be terrorists.

It's not as if Team Blair cooked up the idea out of xenophobia. The fact is, the Brits have been so lax in dealing with Arab and Muslim terrorists that a French government report charged the United Kingdom with being a "haven" for terrorist money-laundering. London papers are filled with stories of known terrorists who have been allowed to live here without fear of extradition.

Jordan convicted Osama bin Laden money man Abu Qatada of financing a recent, foiled terrorist attempt to bomb millennium festivities in Jordan. But the Brits have no extradition treaty with Jordan, so Abu Qatada hasn't had to worry about jail anywhere.

That's why wags call this town Londonistan.

That's why Blair has been forced to find a way to deter would-be killers, who operate freely in their adopted land, thanks to well-intended laws.

Some Labor Party members of Parliament also took issue with a provision in the bill, pushed by Home Secretary David Blunkett, that would create a new crime -- incitement of religious hatred.

Any civil libertarian, of course, would bristle at that notion. Comedian Rowan Atkinson wrote a letter to the Times of London complaining that such a law could hinder free speech.

I'm sure it would -- and critics are right to object. What doesn't square is that these critics are against free speech for people who say racist things, but oddly concerned about the civil rights of people who aid terrorists and abet murderers. (The home secretary's office explained there have been some 40 prosecutions under the 1986 law prohibiting incitement of racial hatred in the past five years.) The Times editorialized on Tuesday that the law against inciting racial hatred enjoys "broad public support," while the Blunkett religion measure is bad because, I guess, outlawing incitement of religious hatred isn't popular. Thus, while the House of Commons eventually passed the provision, the House of Lords is expected to fight harder against it.

It's too like home. Activists are willing to go to great lengths to curb law-abiding citizens' rights and livelihoods for negligible threats. Gun-control laws curb the rights of lawful gun owners to stave off an unlikely attack by a well-armed stranger. Good people support draconian environmental regulations for unproven environmental threats. It's acceptable if working stiffs lose, say, their jobs, if it's for a good cause.

The Brits go one further in their willingness to outlaw racist speech. Then, the worst threat looms and oddly they develop scruples for the civil rights of people with mass murder on their minds. It is so important to some people that they appear even-handed that they can't recognize the threat posed by those who would kill thousands of civilians.

Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


11/28/01 Admissions and omissions
11/26/01 Guns and abayas
11/21/01 Depraved minds think alike
11/19/01 Guilty, a la carte
11/14/01 Interpreting the entrails of Election 2000
11/12/01 Life and liberty
11/09/01 Safety is as safety does
11/07/01 More hot air on global warming
11/05/01 Bumped Pakistani's molehill
11/01/01 Freedom snuffed out
10/29/01 Give war a chance
10/26/01 Airline bill needs liftoff
10/22/01 The Riordan Principle
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate