Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review Dec. 24, 2001 / 9 Teves, 5762

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Don't heckle ink monopolists

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com -- THE lesson California State University Sacramento graduates learned from their commencement festivities last weekend was, to paraphrase an old saying: Don't heckle people who buy ink by the barrel.

Especially if the speaker is Sacramento Bee Publisher Janis Besler Heaphy. Last weekend, Heaphy was the university's commencement speaker. Her talk focused on the need to cling to civil liberties despite the terrorist threat. She urged the crowd to feel free to protest the government when it was wrong.

The audience, to her chagrin, had no need of convincing when it came to the value of protest. Some audience members started shouting things at Heaphy.

She ended her talk five minutes into an eight-minute speech. The Bee ran a story about the incident, the opinion pages ran the text of the speech, and Bee Columnist Daniel Weintraub wrote a column scolding the hecklers. Let me make it clear that I consider heckling to be rude behavior. As a recipient of said behavior, I prefer debate to drowning out other voices. But the irony of the Heaphy incident deserves comment.

Start with the fact that Heaphy told the students: "We need your perspective. We need your energy. We need your thinking." But when people confronted her with their thinking, she did not thank them for expressing their viewpoint. She did not engage them. She clammed up.

According to the text of the speech printed in the Bee, Heaphy also would have told the students it was their "duty" to question the government. (But she got huffy when the audience questioned her.) And, "Once you've developed your opinions, have the courage to express them."

Many parents were angry that Heaphy used a commencement speech as a forum to protest Bush administration policies. "Although we had gone to the Arco Arena to celebrate our daughter Michelle's graduating cum laude and the diligence with which she worked to pursue her goals, we were subjected to a woman on a political mission instead," Tura Avner of Petaluma, Calif., explained. It especially irked Avner that Heaphy hijacked her daughter's graduation ceremony, when Heaphy already has a forum -- a newspaper, no less -- in which to present her opinions.

The publisher is not talking to the press on the speech. Hmmmm. I asked CSU Sacramento spokesperson Ann Reed why Heaphy didn't continue talking or engage the audience. Reed answered: "She probably could have continued, but there was noise. That was her choice."

It was also Heaphy's choice to make the insulting remark that America's "initial reaction (to the Sept. 11 attacks) was for revenge." She attacked the administration next for asking newspapers not to print President Bush's itinerary during a visit to Sacramento and asking TV networks to "censor portions of the videos produced by Osama bin Laden."

"Even here," Bee columnist Weintraub wrote, "she did not say outright that any of these policies were wrong. She was mildly critical, her real purpose was to raise questions."

According to sources, the question that most riled the audience was this: "If bin Laden's words are suppressed, should we then censor the words of anyone who might oppose the administration or disagrees with a United States policy?"

Of course, the answer is no. But since nobody is talking about censoring criticism of the administration, her question was downright inane. And it's annoying when someone urges other people to feel free to criticize the government, then hides behind the pose of, as Weintraub wrote, just raising questions.

CSU Sacramento President Don Gerth was appalled. He has argued that most students did not engage in the heckling, that the audience was more at fault. In a statement, he noted that graduates had a "right" to hear what Heaphy had to say.

He has a point. It would have been best if the critics simply voiced their opinion by walking out. But as Avner noted, when audiences criticize publishers, they're hecklers. When they drown out conservatives, they're "protesters."


Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.


Up


12/21/01Mumia finds safety in numbers
12/19/01 The self-help PBS shopping network
12/17/01 Caught on tape
12/14/01 Know when to hold 'em
12/10/01 Old friends
12/06/01 I read the news today, oh boy
12/03/01 It's not cricket
11/28/01 Admissions and omissions
11/26/01 Guns and abayas
11/21/01 Depraved minds think alike
11/19/01 Guilty, a la carte
11/14/01 Interpreting the entrails of Election 2000
11/12/01 Life and liberty
11/09/01 Safety is as safety does
11/07/01 More hot air on global warming
11/05/01 Bumped Pakistani's molehill
11/01/01 Freedom snuffed out
10/29/01 Give war a chance
10/26/01 Airline bill needs liftoff
10/22/01 The Riordan Principle
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders 12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?

© 2000, Creators Syndicate