Jewish World Review Oct. 5, 2001 / 18 Tishrei, 5762
Debra J. Saunders
bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
THE blame-America crowd has taken to calling Osama bin Laden a creature of the CIA, a horrific example of "blowback" -- the term used when trained operatives later and unexpectedly turn on their creators. Some speak as if bin Laden is the United States' own Frankenstein monster. A piece on the www.truthout.com website calls bin Laden a "monster of our own creation."
On the website www.stopworldwar3.com, peacenik Noam Chomsky says that the CIA "preferred the most fanatic and cruel fighters they could mobilize" -- and then notes that bin Laden and his followers turned against America after the United States deployed troops to Saudi Arabia during the Persian Gulf War. Yet even Chomsky admits that whether bin Laden "personally happened to have direct contact with the CIA is unclear, and not particularly important." The Independent of London's story said only that there may have been a nexus between the CIA and bin Laden.
While the United States spent a reported $3 billion training and equipping the mujahedeen, CIA spokesman Bill Harlow denies that the agency ever paid, trained or equipped bin Laden. The New York Times reported that bin Laden "did not take up the rifle." He raised money and supplies for the mujahedeen before he formed his own camp of Afghan freedom fighters in 1986, a precursor to the infamous al Qaeda.
Time magazine reports that while the CIA denies any direct contact with bin Laden, "U.S. officials acknowledge that some of the aid probably ended up with bin Laden's group anyway."
Asked if he believes there has been blowback, the Cato Institute's defense expert Ivan Eland answered, "Partially." While some critics go too far "saying that somehow the United States invited this attack," he continued, "I do think that we probably did make the Taliban stronger, and also we made some of the people that bin Laden recruited stronger."
That's hardly creating the monster.
Besides, it's wrong to make the Afghan war all about America.
Pakistan General Consul Toheed Ahmad bristled at the notion that the CIA created bin Laden: "It was the entire free world that was helping the Afghan resistance. It was not the CIA's war. It was the world's war against the occupation of a country by one superpower."
The 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was so brutal that, according to Jean-Francois Revel, author of "Why Democracies Perish," the country's population dropped by nearly 40 percent because people either left the country or were killed. When the United States doesn't step in to alleviate such atrocities in poor countries, the left charges "racism."
It would be nice if the United States could avoid attachments with countries that, for example, repress women. Hope for that day. Alas, that kind of purity is a luxury America can't afford right now. The United States has to win a war against terrorists who are more than intolerant of different beliefs, they are butchers. America cannot fight this type of thug by insisting on fighting only with nice, like-minded allies.
Nor can America shoulder the blame for the faults of its former associates, especially former not-quite associates.
Osama bin Laden was drawn to the cause of fighting "infidels" encroaching on Islamic countries years before he had ever had any indirect ties with the CIA.
The villain in this story is not any entity that may or may not have trained some al Qaeda troops. The villain is radical, oppressive Islamic extremism. For Osama bin Laden, it was
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
10/04/01:Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders
12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?
© 2000, Creators Syndicate