Jewish World Review Oct. 7, 2001 / 21 Tishrei, 5762
Debra J. Saunders
Don't feed Israel to the beast
IF the United States were to walk away from Israel, would Osama bin Laden and terrorist networks back off, as some San Francisco Chronicle readers apparently believe?
First, bin Laden hates the United States more than Israel. As Afghanistan specialist David B. Edwards of Williams College noted: "The biggest issue for Osama bin laden isn't Israel. The biggest issue is the U.S. troops in the (Persian) Gulf, near holy places." Bin Laden readily admits that he turned against America after U.S. troops were deployed to Saudi Arabia in 1990.
"If Israel had never been created," asserts pro-war activist Clifford May, "we'd still be going through this." Former GOP Gov. Pete Wilson, now a member of the Bush administration's Defense Policy Board, adds, "If Israel had not existed, Iraq still would have attacked Kuwait."
Or take the word of bin Laden himself: "The call to wage war against America was made because America has spearheaded the crusade against the Islamic nation, sending tens of thousands of troops to the land of the two Holy Mosques," he told Time Magazine in 1999, referring to the Persian Gulf War deployment.
Two, you don't appease mass murderers.
"The people who say that (America should abandon Israel) are precisely like the people who said back in the 1930s that if we just let Hitler have Czechoslovakia, he'll be satisfied. It doesn't take very much research to understand that these militant Islamic terrorists want much more than the destruction of Israel. They seek the destruction of America and the West." Said Wilson: "There is no appeasement. Appeasement does not do more than gain a small amount of time at a great cost, because it encourages aggressors to expand their evil efforts."
Edwards, who thinks to the left of May and Wilson, has a different take, but ends up at the same place: "There is no doubt that as long as the Palestinian-Israel situation festers, there is going to be terrorism. There's going to be a deep-seated mistrust of the United States." But, "If we were to suddenly drop our support of Israel, it would be tremendously destabilizing, and a sign of weakness."
Three, if America ends its alliance with Israel, more blood will flow, not only here, but also in the Mideast.
The only question is whose blood, and for that there is no good answer. Wilson fears terrorists "would try to murder every last Israeli. They would try to literally destroy Israel. May believes "if Israel is destroyed, it will only whet their appetite."
Edwards has a different take: He fears that in an isolated Israel "the temptation would be much greater to use nuclear weapons if need be to protect themselves. I'd hate to see the Masada complex come to life again." Masada is the high mesa on which almost 1,000 Israelis killed themselves rather than submit to a Roman army in 73.
Four, free people must defeat murderous thugs.
Many times I've heard people wonder out loud how it is that the world could turn a deaf ear to Hitler's well-aired genocidal plans. Of course, it's easier to accept murderous intent when other people are the target. But also, the answer can be found today when well-meaning people say that they need to understand the motives of the terrorists, as if they is some mystery (there isn't), or worse, some redeeming cause behind the slaughter. Some, to their discredit, see Israel as the sop to throw at Terror.
They do not understand that they can't feed Jews to Terror, and then expect Terror to not crave other Infidels. They do not understand that peace and terror cannot coexist. They do not understand that sometimes people have to fight for freedom, or that freedom is worth fighting
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
10/05/01:bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders
12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?
© 2000, Creators Syndicate