Jewish World Review Oct. 22, 2001 / 5 Mar-Cheshvan, 5762
Debra J. Saunders
The Riordan Principle
THERE are two ways you can look at the defection of four key Republicans from former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan's exploratory gubernatorial campaign.
One is that Riordan, 71, transcends petty partisan politics, as do most California voters. The pro-choice Riordan is exactly the kind of Republican who could beat Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, largely because he cares more about results than ideology. As Riordan told a group of Republican women this month, his campaign would be "a bridge between the GOP and rest of California voters, particularly women.''
The other way is to figure that Riordan is a train wreck of a candidate who has lost four top advisers before he even announced that he is running. You could consider him a political embodiment of the Peter Principle, which says that people rise to their level of incompetence, then stay there. Except that in politics, you don't get to stay in elective office. You lose.
Look at the body count. First, veteran political consultant Dan Schnur left the campaign.
Then strategist Arnold Steinberg, who has advised Riordan in the past, and deputy director Fiona Hutton exited. Speechwriter Bill Whalen is "on a break'' from the campaign. At the same time, a number of Democrats have a raised profile in the campaign coterie -- namely unpaid consultants Clint Reilly, Patrick Caddell and Riordan's wife Nancy Daly.
Observers wonder if Riordan, the Republican, is now planning to run to the left of Davis. Said one insider who did not want to be named, "He acts like the Republican party doesn't exist.''
The campaign has been working to make a virtue of Riordan's bipartisan approach. Political director Kevin Spillane, a Republican, noted, "Richard Riordan is not your typical Republican, and that is exactly why he can be elected governor of California.''
Sounds good, but Riordan's more than bipartisan, he's all over the map -- and highly inconsistent. Last year, he gave $12,500 to Davis campaign coffers. This year, he is getting ready to challenge Davis.
Asked why Riordan is a Republican, Spillane answered, "He's pro-business. He supports public safety. He's a government reformer.'' Then, why has Riordan contributed to some of the most anti-business, soft-on-crime Democrats in California, such as Sen. Barbara Boxer and Rep. Maxine Waters and state Senate President John Burton's Senate Majority Fund?
Those contributions suggest more than that Riordan isn't a good Republican, they suggest he has no center, no core values.
To which Spillane responded, "What is Gray Davis' core?''
The pragmatist might argue that Riordan needs no core, not with the strong poll numbers he enjoys. A Field Poll conducted before the attack showed Riordan beating Davis 47 percent to 43 percent, while Davis commanded a 12-point lead over Jones and 19 points over Simon. Team Riordan is banking on Republicans being so desperate to win the governor's seat that they'll go with the candidate who is a clear winner.
This is where questions about Riordan's discipline are key. The Davis campaign is fat with other people's money and willing to use it to pound the GOP nominee. If Riordan doesn't have a consistent and strong message, he's roadkill. If he makes more verbal gaffes, he's roadkill.
(As in last month's statement: "I'd be a dirty, rotten, lousy rat if I turned my back on the people who've given me several million dollars.'')
Said Spillane: "Bill Jones and Bill Simon wish they had the problems of the Riordan campaign. They would trade places with us any day of the week.''
True, when it comes to his campaign coffers and poll ratings. But I don't think they'd want to trade his record on giving money to Davis. And I don't think they'd want to defend against his
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
10/19/01 Before America gets tired of the war on terrorism
10/17/01 Patriot games
10/15/01 I was a 'McCainiac,' and I have seen the light
10/12/01 University of Censorship's fall semester
10/11/01 Poor little rich boy, Osama
10/07/01 Don't feed Israel to the beast
10/05/01: bin Laden is not our Frankenstein monster
10/04/01: Where no man has gone before
09/26/01: Who's bloodthirsty?
09/26/01: What's to understand?
09/20/01: Barbara Lee's line in the sand
09/14/01: You gotta love this country
09/13/01: ENTER TERROR
09/11/01: You can't clone ethics
09/06/01: NOW's goal: equal rights for women without equal responsibility
08/30/01: What's love got to do with it?
08/24/01: A clean, well-lighted place for junkies
08/20/01: Bush should stand up for justice
08/08/01: Don't give Peace (Dept). a chance
08/03/01: Lose a kid, pass a law
08/01/01: Welcome to France, killers
07/30/01: Why it's easy being green (in Europe)
07/26/01: If disabled means expendable
07/23/01: Condit should not resign
07/18/01: Feinstein should learn her limit
07/16/01: A drought of common sense
07/13/01: The catalog has no clothes
07/05/01: It's Bush against the planet
07/03/01: The man who would be guv
06/29/01: Wheeled, wired and free
06/27/01: O, fearful new world
06/25/01: End HMO horrors
06/21/01: Either they're dishonest or clueless
06/18/01: Freedom is a puff of smoke
06/15/01: In praise of going heavy: Yes, you can take it all
06/13/01: McVeigh: 'Unbowed' maybe, but dead for sure
06/11/01: Gumby strikes back
06/08/01: Los Angeles' last white mayor?
06/07/01: Kids will be kids, media will be media
06/04/01: Draw a line in the sand
05/30/01: Just don't call him a moderate
05/29/01: Operation: Beat up on civil rights
05/24/01: Of puppies, kittens and huge credit-card debts
05/22/01: Bush needs an energy tinkerbell
05/18/01: Divided we stand, united they fall
05/16/01: Big Bench backs might over right
05/15/01: Close SUV loophole
05/11/01: Kill the test, welcome failure
05/09/01: DA mayor's disappointing legacy
05/07/01: If it ain't broken ...
05/03/01: They shoot civilians, don't they?
04/30/01: Executions are not for prime time
04/12/01: White House and the green myth
04/10/01: The perjurer as celeb
04/04/01: Bush bashers don't know squat
04/02/01: Drugging our oldsters
03/30/01: Robert Lee Massie exercises his death wish
03/28/01: Cheney's nuclear reactor
03/26/01: Where California and Mexico meet
03/16/01: Boy's sentence was no accident
03/14/01: Soft money, hard reform
03/12/01: Banks, big credit lines and consumer bankruptcy
03/09/01: Free speech dies in Berkeley
03/02/01: When rats have rights
02/28/01: Move a frog, go to jail?
02/26/01: They knew they'd get away with it
02/20/01: How Dems define tax fairness
02/16/01: The jackpot casino Carmel tribe?
02/14/01: You can fight school success
02/12/01: Hannibal -- with guts this time
02/08/01: A family of jailbirds
02/05/01: Reality's most demeaning TV moments
02/01/01: Justice for the non-Rich
01/26/01: Hail to the chiefs of D.C. opinion
01/24/01: A day of mud and monuments
01/22/01: Diversity, division, de-lovely D.C.
01/19/01: Parties agree: Give back the money
01/17/01: Get tough with the oil companies, or forget pumping more Alaskan crude
01/15/01: Mineta better pray that no attending confirmation senator has ever driven to San Jose during rush hour
01/12/01: Europeans should look in the mirror
01/10/01: Dems' reasons for dissin' Dubya's picks
01/08/01: Jerry, curb your guru
01/03/01: A foe of Hitler and friend of Keating
12/28/00: Nice people think nice thoughts
12/26/00: The Clinton years: Epilogue
12/21/00: 'Tis the season to free nonviolent drug offenders
12/18/00: A golden opportunity is squandered
12/15/00: You can take the 24 years, good son
12/13/00: Court of law vs. court of public opinion
12/08/00: A salvo in the war on the war on drugs
12/06/00: Don't cry, Butterfly: Big trees make great decks
12/04/00: Florida: Don't do as Romans did
11/30/00: Special City's hotel parking ticket
11/27/00: No means yes, yes means more than yes
11/22/00: The bench, the ballot and fairness
11/20/00: Mendocino, how green is your ballot?
© 2000, Creators Syndicate