Jewish World Review July 21, 2003 / 21 Tamuz, 5763
The Republican spending orgy
At their national convention in Philadelphia three years ago, Republicans pointed with pride to their recent record of
fiscal rectitude -- a welcome change, they said, from the Democratic record that preceded it.
"In the four decades from 1954 to 1994," the Republican platform declared, "government spending increased at an
average annual rate of 7. 9 percent, and the public's debt increased from $224 billion to $3.4 trillion." Those were the
profligate years, when Democrats usually controlled both houses of Congress.
"Since 1994," it went on, "with Republicans leading the House and Senate, spending has been held to an annual 3.1
percent rate of growth, and the nation's debt will be nearly $400 billion lower by the end of this year. The federal
government has operated in the black for the last two years and is now projected to run a surplus of nearly $5 trillion
over ten years."
Missing from the Republicans' recitation was any mention of the Democrat who had been in the White House since
1993. Didn't President Clinton deserve any of the credit for the spending restraint and budget surpluses?
Not according to Republicans, he didn't. In their view, they were the ones who slowed the federal spending train and
forced Clinton to curb his big-government impulses. If he had had a Democratic Congress to do his bidding, they said,
that train would have raced out of control.
So here we are three years later, with not only a Republican Congress but a Republican president, too -- and the
federal spending train is racing out of control. The Bush administration estimated last week that the government will end
the current fiscal year with a budget deficit of $455 billion, and will generate even more red ink -- $475 billion -- in fiscal
2004. Over the next five years, the public debt is expected to rise by $1.9 trillion. The administration now projects next
year's federal outlays at $2.27 trillion, more than $400 billion higher than the government was spending when the
president took office in 2001.
Where has all the Republican rectitude gone?
As any Republican politician will be glad to tell you, the GOP is the party of fiscal discipline. Unlike the wastrels of the
Democratic Party, Republicans know that all government money is really taxpayers' money, and they take great pains to
spend that money frugally.
Sure they do. That's why Republican George W. Bush, backed by a Republican Congress, is on track to become the
biggest-spending president since LBJ.
In the first three years of the Bush administration, government spending has climbed -- in real, inflation-adjusted terms
-- by a staggering 15.6 percent. That far outstrips the budget growth in Clinton's first three years, when real spending
climbed just 3.5 percent. Under the first President Bush, the comparable figure was 8.3 percent; under Ronald Reagan,
6.8 percent, and under Jimmy Carter, 13.3 percent. You read that right: Bush is a bigger spender than Carter was.
To be sure, Bush's budgets have had to account for the aftermath of Sept. 11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But even when defense spending is excluded, discretionary spending has soared by nearly 21 percent in Bush's first three
years. In Clinton's first triennium, non-defense discretionary spending declined slightly. If their budgets were all you
had to go by, you might peg Bush for the Democrat and Clinton for the Republican.
The budget cycle Bush inherited in 2001 closed with a surplus of $127 billion. The deficits that now stretch as far as
the eye can see are the result of reckless budget-busting that would have Republicans shrieking if Al Gore were
president. To see such promiscuous budgeting come out of a Republican administration, with the consent of a
Republican Congress, should outrage loyal GOPers even more.
Predictably, liberals and Democrats are loudly blaming the Bush deficits on the Bush tax cuts. But tax relief isn't
leaking red ink all over the budget; spending is. In 2008, when most of the tax cuts signed by Bush will be fully phased
in, they will reduce federal revenues by $177 billion. In the same year, total federal spending will be $494 billion higher
than it is today. By the end of the five-year budget plan, in other words, spending increases will outweigh tax cuts by
nearly 3 to 1.
Of course, if spending turns out to be significantly higher than the estimate -- as it usually does -- that ratio will be even
more lopsided. And if the tax cuts stimulate economic growth and wealth creation -- as they usually do -- it will be more
lopsided still. There's no question about it: Irresponsible spending, not tax relief, is the virus that's running amok.
From the pork-laden homeland security bill to last year's bloated farm bill, Washington's orgy of spending is bringing
on the biggest deficits in American history. The gigantic prescription-drug entitlement making its way through the Capitol
will force the budget even further into the red and the nation even deeper into debt. Americans count on Republicans to
enforce, or at least invoke, the First Law of Holes: When in one, stop digging. But Republicans rule both ends of
Pennsylvania Avenue, and the digging proceeds more furiously than ever. How will the GOP explain that at its next
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
07/18/03: The frenzy-of-the-month club
07/14/03: The death of American racism
07/09/03: Same-sex marriage vs. society's ideal
07/07/03: The lull before the storm
06/30/03: The benefits of race-based admissions
06/20/03: An uprising to cheer
06/11/03: Musings, random and otherwise
06/09/03: A growing rift with Europe
05/27/03: Preferences, racial and otherwise
05/23/03: The bottom line for teachers unions
05/12/03: Castro's cheerleaders
05/08/03: In 'enlightened' New England, it hurts to give
05/06/03: Help the living before the dead
04/25/03: The search for the 'smoking gun'
04/21/03: Trading truth for access?
04/14/03: Kerry's abortion litmus test
04/11/03: Meanwhile, in Cuba, the tyranny goes on
04/07/03: Explaining the war to a six-year-old
03/31/03: Empowering a terroristocracy in the name of 'peace'?
03/27/03: America the liberator
03/10/03: THE UNITED NATIONS, RIP
03/10/03: Changing the definition of marriage
03/07/03: Liberate Iraq -- even with unclean hands
03/03/03: Why talk radio tilts right
02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe