Jewish World Review Feb. 8, 2002 / 26 Shevat, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST -- If anything, the threat is greater now than before.... The infrastructure now exists to carry off 20 simultaneous World Trade Center-type bombings across the United States.
-- Steven Emerson, June 1997

The foreign terrorist threat in the United States is one of the most important issues we face.... We now face distinct possibilities of mass civilian murder the likes of which have not been seen since World War II.
-- Emerson, Feb. 24, 1998

Al Qaeda is ... planning new attacks on the US.... [It has] learned, for example, how to destroy large buildings.... Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups ... have silently declared war on the US; in turn, we must fight them as we would in a war.''
-- Emerson, May 31, 2001

No longer is Steven Emerson a prophet without honor in his own land. For years he warned of the threat Americans faced from radical Islamist terrorism, and for years his reward was to be snubbed, shunned, and slandered as an "Islamophobe" and a bigot. But on Sept. 11, his dire forebodings came horribly true and his phone has been ringing off the hook ever since.

The staff at The Investigative Project in Washington -- Emerson's intelligence and data-gathering center on militant Islamic activities, the world's largest -- has logged hundreds of calls from journalists seeking information about extremist groups or insight into the latest developments in the war against terrorism. From the New York Post to the Chicago Tribune to The Los Angeles Times, newspapers nationwide have quoted him. So have foreign papers, such as Toronto's Globe and Mail and The Jerusalem Post.

Television has come calling, too. CBS's "48 Hours" aired a story on Emerson's success in exposing radical Islamic operatives in the United States. He has been interviewed by German, French, and British television. NBC hired him as a terrorism analyst, and has featured him on "Today," "Dateline NBC," and Chris Matthews' "Hardball."

Purchasing this book
-- linked at right --
helps fund JWR

And as if that weren't enough, Emerson has just published a new book. American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us is the indispensable guide to American Muslim extremists and their ties to international terrorism, and its extraordinary timeliness will only increase the attention its author is drawing.

Emerson wasn't exactly unknown before Sept. 11. In 1994, he produced "Jihad in America," a shocking documentary that won a sheaf of prestigious awards. He testified before Congress at least a dozen times. His essays were published on the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal. Clearly, though, there has been a quantum leap of media interest in his work. Emerson is now routinely described as the nation's foremost expert on Islamist terrorism, and no serious news organization would think of ignoring his views.

Except National Public Radio.

NPR blacklisted Emerson in 1998, bowing to a pressure campaign by Muslim extremists who falsely libeled him as an anti-Muslim bigot. It was an outrageous charge: Not only is it simply untrue, but Emerson always emphasizes that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding. Nevertheless, NPR officials -- including its national news editor -- explicitly vowed to keep him off the air. "You have my promise he won't be used again," producer Ellen Silva wrote to Ali Abunimah of the American Arab Action Network. "It is NPR policy."

After I exposed this disgraceful blacklist in a column, NPR's vice president flatly denied it. "There never was and never will be a policy of banning or blacklisting at NPR," wrote Jeffrey Dvorkin. "Mr. Emerson is not 'banned' and in fact we anticipate that he will be on NPR again at an appropriate time."

That was 3-1/2 years ago. Emerson's voice has not been heard on NPR since.

Asked this week about the continuing refusal to speak to Emerson, spokesman Bruce Drake would only repeat that NPR "does not have a policy of blacklisting anybody."

That a network subsidized with tax dollars refuses to let its listeners hear from someone of Emerson's caliber and expertise is appalling. That it does so in deference to an ugly smear campaign is shameful. But the real scandal is what the blacklisting of Emerson is a symptom of: NPR's unwillingness to report accurately on the danger posed by Islamist fanaticism.

"NPR has consistently suppressed news stories about militant Islamic groups in the United States operating under false cover," says Emerson, who examined the network's coverage after it declared him persona non grata. "It has allowed radical Muslim 'leaders' to have their say, while ignoring the same leaders' statements and activities in support of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad." He documented the charge in a detailed 1999 analysis for the Journal of Counterterrorism. Other critics have reached a similar conclusion.

Fortunately, Emerson is now being heard loud and clear -- despite NPR. "Since Sept. 11, 2001, everything has changed -- and yet nothing has changed," he warns. "The only difference is that there are 3,500 more people dead. We are still vulnerable. We have only a short time to prevent the next chapter from unfolding. This is the most important battle of our time."

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe