Jewish World Review Oct. 15, 2001 / 28 Tishrei, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Rush Limbaugh's ear -- A LOT of liberals hate Rush Limbaugh -- or the caricature that they think of as Rush Limbaugh -- but even the most doctrinaire Bolshevik had to feel at least a twinge of sympathy when the nation's preeminent radio personality announced last week that he has gone almost completely deaf.

Or maybe not. Limbaugh has a strangely unhinging effect on some people. When Al Franken wrote a book about his fellow entertainer and commentator, he crudely titled it Rush Limbaugh Is a Big, Fat Idiot. The liberal columnist Carl Rowan once snarled that "the blood of America's race war victims will be on the hands and bloated bodies of Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern." It is hard to say which was more grotesque -- the suggestion that Limbaugh is a racist or the comparison to a bottom-feeder like Stern. And there is even uglier stuff where those examples came from.

So maybe there are some hard-core left-wingers out there so steeped in ideological bile that word of Limbaugh's awful setback is cause for mockery or glee. But for tens of millions of ordinary Americans, the news that Rush can't hear anymore comes as a tragic shock.

The irony is almost Shakespearean: It is Limbaugh's ability to hear that has been the key to his success. Of course he is a great talker, and of course his mouth -- his ability to hold forth for three hours a day, five days a week -- is a powerful asset. But it is his ear that has made him a cultural phenomenon: His ear for the sentiments of Middle America, his ear for its patriotism and practical sense, his ear for what Main Street finds funny, or crazy, or inspiring. Lots of microphone jockeys have the gift of gab. Very few have the instinct for their audience -- for its convictions, its frustrations, its political judgment -- that Limbaugh does. That is the source of his tremendous acclaim.

"I approach my audience with enormous respect," Limbaugh wrote in a 1994 article for Policy Review, the journal of the Heritage Foundation. "These are the people whose most heartfelt convictions have been dismissed, scorned, and made fun of by the mainstream media. I do not make fun of them."

On the contrary: He gives voice to their thoughts.

"Despite claims from my detractors that my audience is comprised of mind-numbed robots, waiting for me to give them some sort of marching orders," he continued, "the fact is that I am merely enunciating opinions and analysis that support what they already know. Thousands of listeners have told me, on the air, in faxes, letters, and by computer e-mail, that I agree with them. Finally, they say, somebody in the media is saying out loud what they have believed all along."

In July, Limbaugh signed the biggest contract in radio history, a $285 million deal to continue broadcasting through 2009. If the free market is right about Limbaugh, there has never been a radio host with greater appeal. And that is because there has never been a radio host more in sync with the feelings and attitudes of his countrymen.

Limbaugh could never have earned such esteem if he were a racist and hate-peddler. Honest liberals admit as much.

In 1993, Washington Post columnist William Raspberry wrote a piece blasting Limbaugh for his "demagoguery ... his gay bashing, his racial putdowns." Like the Mississippi segregationists of his youth, Raspberry said, Limbaugh "is so good at ... tossing the raw meat of bigotry to people.... Limbaugh is a bigot."

Eleven days later, Raspberry wrote a second column retracting the first.

"Rush, I'm sorry," he began. He confessed, to his great credit, that the earlier piece had been written in ignorance. "My opinions about [Limbaugh] had come largely from other people -- mostly friends who think Rush is a four-letter word. They are certain he is a bigot. Is he?"

Raspberry -- who by this point had listened to several hours of Limbaugh's shows and perused one of his books -- went on to answer his own question. Limbaugh might be "smart-alecky" and love "to rattle liberal cages," he might be "unrelenting in his assault on ... political correctness." But he was no more a bigot or hatemonger than Art Buchwald.

I have never met or spoken with Limbaugh, and I don't often get the chance to tune in to his program. But I can attest to his extraordinary reach and influence.

A few weeks before Bill Clinton's re-election in 1996 I wrote a column headlined "Four more years? Here are 40 reasons to say no." Shortly after noon on the day it appeared, my phone began ringing off the hook with queries about it. E-mail requests for the column began streaming in. I couldn't understand the explosion of interest -- until I learned that Rush had read the column over the air, raving about it to his 20 million listeners. When he mentioned that it could be found on The Boston Globe's web site, the digital tidal wave that ensued crashed the server -- but not before breaking the site's previous daily record for visits by more than 1 million. The switchboard operators, bless their patience, were deluged for days.

Over the next few weeks, so many people contacted the Globe to request the issue with my column that the Back Issues Dept. laid in an extra 1,000 copies -- and sold out of them all. It was the most-requested issue of the paper, I was told, since Larry Bird retired from the Celtics.

With the comical pomposity that is part of his shtick, Limbaugh often crows that he has "talent on loan from G-d." Now G-d has sent him a trial to go with the talent. May he come through it with his gifts and good humor intact.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2001, Boston Globe