Jewish World Review March 27, 2003 / 23 Adar II, 5763
America the liberator
The campaign to liberate Iraq is going well, though you might not know it from the shock and awe of the media, which
apparently discovered only this week that war -- even for a winning army -- is hell.
As is the case in nearly every war, brave soldiers have been captured or killed, armor and aircraft have been
destroyed, and Mother Nature -- this time in the form of furious sandstorms -- has refused to cooperate with military
But the losses and setbacks have been vastly greater for Saddam Hussein's military than for the forces fighting to
topple him. With the war only a week old, Iraq's southern oil fields and its only port city are in American hands;
thousands of Iraqi soldiers are in custody; Republican Guard divisions are being ripped from the air; an anti-Saddam
uprising, aided by British troops, is reportedly underway in Basra; no Scuds have been fired at Israel; and the
American-led alliance is nearly at the outskirts of Baghdad. If Gulf War II will not be a second Six Day War, neither is
its outcome in doubt: Saddam's brutal fascist regime is going to be destroyed.
But it will go down fighting, and it will remain brutal and fascist to the last. And how do brutal fascists fight? They
shoot POWs in the head and flaunt their corpses on camera. They site military hardware near hospitals and schools,
deliberately using civilians as human shields. They wave a white flag to indicate surrender, then open up with machine
guns or rocket-propelled grenades. They order noncombatants in front-line cities to attack allied troops, threatening to
kill them if they refuse. They build a military bunker under the hotel at which foreign reporters are required to stay.
Yes, war is hell, but nothing experienced by the coalition forces so far compares with the hellishness of the Baathist
regime they are fighting. Those who need a graphic reminder might visit the Web site of the Kurdistan Democratic
Party, where Saddam's chemical slaughter in Halabja is recalled in photos and reportage. Or they might review the
work of Indict, a British organization that gathers evidence of crimes against humanity committed by members of
Saddam's government. In the Times of London last week, Ann Clwyd, a Labor member of Parliament and Indict's
chairman, quoted from one eyewitness's affidavit:
"There was a machine designed for shredding plastic. Men were dropped into it and we were again made to watch.
Sometimes they went in head first and died quickly. Sometimes they went in feet first and died screaming. It was
horrible. I saw 30 people die like this. Their remains would be placed in plastic bags and we were told they would be
used as fish food . . . on one occasion, I saw Qusay [Saddam Hussein's younger son] personally supervise these
murders." We can expect more such testimony in the months ahead.
Already the first Iraqis to be set free are adding to our understanding of Saddam's murderous reign. Reporting from
liberated Umm Qasr, for example, Olga Craig wrote in the Telegraph of a "bedraggled band of shoeless soldiers," sick
and hungry, desperate to surrender to an allied regiment:
"One man pulled up his shirt sleeve and held up his right hand. Two fingers had been hacked off and his upper arm
was criss-crosed with scars.
"'This is the price of defiance -- of trying to run away,' he said, his eyes beseeching. . . . 'We know if the British and
American soldiers leave as they did before, and Saddam survives, he will gas the town.' To make sure we understood,
he drew his finger swiftly across his throat."
There were similar scenes in Safwan. The Guardian, another British paper, described the "heartfelt gladness" when
the US Marines arrived. "You're late. What took you so long?" asked a sobbing Ajami Saadoun Khlis, whose son and
brother were murdered by Saddam. "God help you become victorious. I want to say hello to Bush, to shake his hand.
We came out of the grave."
The BBC has been far from supportive of the campaign in Iraq, but that didn't stop its reporter David Willis from
posting his observations in Basra on the Beeb's web site:
"There are lots of people coming out, lots of children and they are applauding. The people . . . shake the hands of
American forces who are seen as liberating the city of Basra." If that was how some Basrans reacted while the city was
still infested with Saddam's secret police, imagine how they will rejoice when Basra has been de-Baathified.
Belatedly, the scales are falling even from the eyes of some antiwar activists. Daniel Pepper, an American who
traveled to Baghdad to be a human shield, was shocked when ordinary Iraqis, such as his taxi driver, told him the facts
of life under Saddam.
"We just sat, listening, our mouths open wide," Pepper wrote this week . "Jake, one of the others, just kept saying,
'Oh, my G-d' as the driver described the horrors of the regime. Jake was so shocked at how naive he had been. We
all were. It hadn't occurred to anyone that the Iraqis might actually be pro-war." Most crushing of all was the realization
that most Iraqis assumed Saddam had paid the protesters to come to Iraq. They could imagine no other reason why
free people would demonstrate against a war to bring him down.
Rarely has the moral gulf between wartime enemies been greater. Yesterday, seven tractor-trailers guarded by US
troops brought tons of food and water into Umm Qasr, the first installment of the "massive amounts" of aid President
Bush has promised the Iraqi people. At about the same time, Marines seized a Nasiriyah hospital in which Saddam's
forces had stockpiled hundreds of weapons, 3,000 chemical suits with masks, and nerve agent antidote. We fight in a
just cause, and Iraqis generations hence will celebrate the coming victory.
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
03/10/03: THE UNITED NATIONS, RIP
03/10/03: Changing the definition of marriage
03/07/03: Liberate Iraq -- even with unclean hands
03/03/03: Why talk radio tilts right
02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe