Jewish World Review March 7, 2003 / 3 Adar II, 5763
Liberate Iraq -- even with unclean hands
One of the arguments of those who oppose a US-led war to topple Saddam Hussein is that America long ago forfeited
its right to lead a moral crusade against the Iraqi dictator. If the e-mail I get is typical, the argument usually goes something
"Where does Washington find the gall to condemn Saddam as evil? Saddam might not even be alive today if
Washington hadn't been his best friend during the Iran-Iraq War. It's all very well for Bush to thunder about Iraq's stash of
chemical and biological weapons -- but who sold Iraq those germs and poisons in the first place? We did! It's not the
peace movement that is morally obtuse, it's a foreign policy that never cared about Saddam's crimes as long as it was
convenient to ignore them."
There is some hyperbole there, but on the whole it's true: In the 1980s the United States supported Saddam's
totalitarian regime and showed little concern for its victims. American exports helped launch Iraq's biological weapons
program. Saddam's horrific violations of international law, such as his use of poison gas on the battlefield, had minimal
effect on US-Iraqi cooperation. And while the tilt toward Saddam began with Jimmy Carter ("We see no fundamental
incompatibility of interests between the US and Iraq" -- National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, April 1980), it
was the Reagan and Bush I administrations that brought it to full flower.
All of this has long been a matter of public record. US shipments of deadly biological agents to Iraq, for example, were
detailed in a 1994 Senate Banking Committee report and a follow-up letter from the Centers for Disease Control in 1995.
They showed that Iraq was allowed to purchase batch after batch of lethal pathogens -- anthrax, botulism, E. coli, West
Nile fever, gas gangrene, dengue fever. At a time when Washington knew that Iraq was using chemical weapons to kill
thousands of Iranian troops, the CDC was shipping germ cultures directly to the Iraqi unconventional weapons facility in
Last week, the National Security Archive at George Washington University published on its Web site a collection of
declassified government documents laying out the American embrace of Saddam in 1980-84. The series is introduced
with a photograph of Saddam firmly shaking hands with Ronald Reagan's special Middle East envoy, a seasoned
Washington veteran named Donald Rumsfeld. Their meeting took place on Dec. 20, 1983, and according to the detailed
notes that were kept, the two men discussed a wide range of topics -- the state of US-Iraqi relations, the war with Iran,
US concerns about terrorism, new arrangements for shipping Iraqi oil, and the Arab-Israeli conflict.
But Rumsfeld said nothing about Saddam's pursuit of nuclear weapons or his use of chemical weapons. Or about the
terrorists he was sheltering in Baghdad. Or about his monstrous record of torture and murder. Rumsfeld's instructions
were to "establish personal rapport" with the dictator and to make it clear that the United States firmly supported Iraq in
the war it had started with Iran. American policy in the Gulf under Reagan was one of unsentimental realpolitik: An
Iranian victory was to be prevented at all costs, and those costs included aiding Iraq militarily and financially and making as
little fuss as possible about its repressive and inhumane behavior.
The year before Rumsfeld's visit, the State Department had removed Iraq from its list of terror-sponsoring states; in
1984, it would resume the full diplomatic relations Iraq had broken off in 1967. The United States became, in effect,
Saddam's silent ally, a policy that was occasionally questioned but never seriously challenged -- either inside the
administration or by Congress.
That policy even went so far as to censor honest commentary about Iraq. When the Voice of America aired an editorial
that included Iraq in a list of countries where "secret police are still widely present," Saddam was furious. To appease him,
the State Department ordered VOA to submit all future editorials about Iraq for pre-broadcast approval. One such
editorial, drafted in July 1990, obliquely warned Iraq not to threaten its neighbors (though it didn't actually name Iraq or
any of those neighboring countries). State killed it. Kuwait was invaded a week later.
I am a great admirer of Reagan, whose conduct of foreign policy overall left the world a freer, safer place. But there is
no way to prettify his handling of Iraq. It empowered an evil and brutal tyrant, gave free rein to his aggressive
megalomania, and treated his human rights atrocities as an unimportant side issue. Had Reagan (and Carter and Bush I)
seen Saddam first and foremost as a dangerous, destabilizing cutthroat rather than a "balance" to Khomeini's Iran, there is
no telling how many lives might have been saved.
But why is any of that an argument against doing the right thing now?
If America played a role in entrenching Saddam's dictatorship, isn't that all the more reason for it now to take the lead in
toppling that dictatorship? If US foreign policy for too long disregarded the suffering of the Iraqi people, is it not good
news that US policy now makes that people's liberation a priority? Are American presidents forever barred from
denouncing a vicious oppressor and leading a war against him because some of their predecessors neglected to do so?
There is no surer recipe for increasing evil in the world than the doctrine that evil may be confronted only by those who
have never failed to do good. Our embrace of Saddam in the '80s was shameful. How much greater our shame will be if
we refuse to destroy him now.
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
03/03/03: Why talk radio tilts right
02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe