Jewish World Review Dec. 3, 2002 / 28 Kislev, 5763

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

On the brink of regime change --- in Iran | Americans who care about Iran had something to be grateful for this Thanksgiving: The State Department finally came out foursquare in support of the hundreds of thousands of Iranians who have been demonstrating for an end to their country's ruthless Islamic dictatorship.

"Iranian officials are fully aware . . . that these are genuine calls for reform and they come directly from the hearts of their own citizens, the people of Iran," said State's deputy spokesman, Philip Reeker, on Wednesday. Freedom of expression is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, he pointed out, "but when Iranian citizens try to exercise this right and appeal to their government for reform, they are met with violence, with arrests, and with death sentences."

That marked a notable shift in attitude from Reeker's press briefing five days earlier. When he was asked then about the stunning anti-government demonstrations that have been convulsing Iran, the exchange went like this:

Q: "Do you have any reaction to the large protests that are going on now and some pretty severe action by police . . .?"

Reeker: "I have not seen anything more than some press reports. As you know, we do not have an embassy in Iran, so I do not have any particular reporting or reaction to give you today."

Q: "You don't want to spur them on?"

Reeker: "I do not have facts, Eli, so I do not have anything on that."

Q: "They've been protesting for three weeks."

Reeker: "I've commented on it in the past."

Q: "Staying in Iran, please --"

Reeker: "Please, it is all Iran today."

Q: "Well, no, but I just want an answer on something. You don't have *any* reaction to pro-reform demonstrators -- for weeks to a month?"

Reeker: "We have, for a long time, suggested that the Iranian Government should listen to its people. We have discussed our concerns with the Iranian Government and some of its policies in terms of support for terrorism. . . . Our policy on Iran has not changed. I just do not have any minute-by-minute or day-to-day update or reaction on any particular developments there."

What prompted the change I can't say. But if the Department of State is finally prepared to support President Bush's policy on Iran, it can only be good news for the war against radical Islamist terrorism.

It has been nearly a year since Bush labeled Iran a member of the "axis of evil," denouncing the "unelected few" -- the ruling mullahs in Tehran -- who "repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom." His words were enthusiastically welcomed inside Iran, where the regime is widely despised and America widely admired. When the Voice of America broadcast a translation of the speech into Iran, it was deluged with hundreds of appreciative phone calls, faxes, and e-mails.

But there was no such enthusiasm in Colin Powell's State Department, which prefers a soft policy of diplomatic engagement with Iran. For months, State kept making approving noises about Tehran's "cooperation" with the US campaigns against Afghanistan and Iraq, and pushed the notion that there are "reformers" in the Iranian regime whose support America should cultivate. Yet it had nothing to say about the Iranian students who have been risking life and limb to challenge the turbaned tyrants responsible for turning Iran into a hellhole of fascist repression.

The extraordinary scenes in Tehran, Tabriz, and Isfahan evoke memories of 1989, when prodemocracy demonstrations drew massive throngs into the streets of nearly every major city in Eastern Europe and China. In Europe, those demonstrations led to freedom; in China, they led to the Tiananmen Square massacre. Which way Iran will go -- the toppling of the dictatorship or a brutal crackdown on the demonstrators -- there is no way to know. But every friend of liberty should be cheering on Iran's people as loudly and encouragingly as possible.

President Bush, it is clear, avidly favors regime change in Tehran. "The people of Iran want the same freedoms, human rights, and opportunities as people around the world," he declared in July, once again condemning the "unelected" theocrats who rule Iran and blasting their "uncompromising, destructive policies." To the demonstrators in the streets, he sent a message of wholehearted support: "As Iran's people move towards a future defined by greater freedom [and] tolerance, they will have no better friend than the United States of America."

Why the rest of his administration has not been equally vocal is a mystery. And even more mysterious is the silence of the press. The uprisings of 1989 were front-page and top-of-the-broadcast news in America for weeks on end. The astonishing demonstrations in Iran ought to be drawing equally ardent coverage.

We are witnessing an amazing moment: The people who have lived under radical Islam the longest want desperately to overthrow it. Across Iran, demonstrators have been chanting, "Death to the Taliban, in Kabul and Tehran." The world's foremost sponsor of international terrorism, one-third of the axis of evil, may be on the brink of collapse. Shouldn't we be doing everything we can to push it over the edge?

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe