Jewish World Review April 12, 2002 / Rosh Chodesh Iyar, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The slavery reparations hustle | Don't bother telling the plaintiffs who sued last month to collect reparations for slavery from three US corporations that they don't have a legal leg to stand on. They already know it.

After all, you don't need a law degree to recognize that FleetBoston, CSX, and Aetna bear no legal culpability today because of lawful activities their corporate ancestors may have engaged in two centuries ago. Even unlawful activities were long ago mooted by statutes of limitations. And in any case, none of the companies being sued and none of their living shareholders has ever owned or trafficked in slaves, just as none of the plaintiffs and none of the 36 million black Americans whose interests they claim to represent has ever been held in bondage. These specious lawsuits will never win.

But then, they were never expected to. The plaintiffs and their lawyers make no secret of the fact that their goal is not to win a legal verdict but to pressure the companies into making lucrative out-of-court settlements. If they balk, the lawyers' PR machine will generate ugly publicity about the companies' "insensitivity" to African Americans. Set up pickets outside their corporate headquarters. Threaten a national boycott. Maybe arrange for a public denunciation by Al Sharpton or the Congressional Black Caucus. It isn't hard to mau-mau corporate America if you know how to play the race card.

"People will come to a point of deciding, do they think a settlement is more appropriate than a trial?," says a gleeful Edward Fagan, one of the lawyers in the Aetna and CSX cases. "If . . . there's a meaningful financial gesture by the defendant companies, then I would encourage the clients to seriously consider it." Similar comments have come from Randall Robinson and Johnnie Cochran, charter members of the self-designated "Reparations Coordinating Committee."

In short, the reparations lawsuits are just the latest twist on Jesse Jackson's long-running racial hustle: Pay up or be smeared as racist. (A compelling account of Jackson's decades-old racket -- Shakedown by Kenneth Timmerman -- has just been published by Regnery.) And the extortion isn't going to end with FleetBoston, Aetna, and CSX: The plaintiffs' lawyers say they have already sent letters inviting settlement offers to another dozen companies, and claim to have identified 1,000 corporations and other institutions that profited in some fashion from slavery.

There's no telling how much money these reparations suits will ultimately extract. Hundreds of millions? Billions? Ultimately, that bill will be paid by American shareholders, employees, and consumers of every color, race, and ethnic background. But a far steeper price will be paid exclusively by American blacks -- especially poor American blacks -- themselves. For every dollar of "reparations" paid, awarded, or extorted will just reinforce the crippling messages of inferiority and grievance that have done so much damage to the black community over the past 35 years.

You cannot make it on your own, the reparations movement says to black Americans. The deck is stacked against you. You are victims in this country; you have always been victims. You'll never succeed in America because America is fundamentally racist. All your troubles -- your unemployment, your drug use, your fatherless families, your kids' academic failure, your violent crime, your domestic abuse, your imprisoned young men -- all of them are the fault of others. Don't blame yourselves, blame white America for never giving you a fair shake. Blame Jim Crow and the decades of segregation. Blame "institutional racism." Blame racial profiling.

Blame slavery.

If black Americans deserve reparations from anyone, it is from the disgraceful black leaders who feed them this diet of self-pity and helplessness. It may be true that slavery and its aftermath continue in some way to exercise a sinister influence on American society. But that influence cannot come close to the massive damage done to black Americans by the constant insistence that success is impossible until every vestige of racism is eradicated and the "debt" for slavery paid in full.

Slavery was a horror and Americans paid a horrific price to uproot it. But every minority group has grievances against the majority. Every group has awful chapters of persecution and humiliation to remember. Only blacks have allowed themselves to be crippled by the lie that the past must forever hold them back. Only the so-called black "leadership" insists on peddling the myth that America is a relentlessly racist place in which blacks are doomed to defeat.

The truth is precisely the opposite. As JWR's Stanley Crouch has written, there is no "more advanced or influential group of black people on the face of this earth than African-Americans." By almost any measure -- income, homeownership, social integration, college education, political power -- black Americans are better off today than they have ever been before.

Reparations' bottom line is that black people are permanent losers who cannot rise above their history. That is a terrible libel, and no one but a racist would believe it.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe