Jewish World Review March 3, 2003 / 30 Adar I, 5763

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Why talk radio tilts right

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Taking yet another crack at the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, a group of left-wing investors are putting up $10 million in seed money to create liberal radio programming that they hope will diminish the influence of conservatives like Rush Limbaugh. To launch the new venture, the donors have tapped Jon Sinton, an Atlanta radio exec whose last big move into left-leaning radio was a syndicated talk show hosted by Texas liberal Jim Hightower in the mid-1990s. Hightower's show crashed soon after takeoff, but Sinton and his backers are convinced that with the right talent, they can fill what they are sure is an aching market need.

"There are so many right-wing talk shows," Sinton told the Associated Press. "We think it's created a hole in the market you could drive a truck through."

For many on the left, the search for an answer to Limbaugh (and to Sean Hannity and Oliver North and Michael Reagan and a host of other radio conservatives) has become something of a quest for the holy grail. Time and again they have put their faith in a Great Liberal Hope, and time and again they have been disappointed.

Hightower -- who bills himself as "America's #1 Populist" -- isn't the only lefty to flop as a radio host. Mario Cuomo flopped, too. And Jerry Brown. And Alan Dershowitz. If there is a hunger out there for left-wing radio, it is certainly keeping itself under wraps.

Is it just a question of finding a more diverting personality? Sheldon Drobny, one of the Democratic venture capitalists underwriting the latest attempt to break the conservative grip on talk-radio, says the problem with liberals like Cuomo et al. is that they weren't any fun to listen to. "What the liberals have failed to do," he said, "is . . . to understand that you first and foremost must be entertaining."

But since when is there a disconnect between liberals and entertainment? The nerve center of the American entertainment industry -- Hollywood -- is a stronghold of American liberalism. Entertaining programs with a decidedly liberal bent -- from the "Today" show to "The West Wing" to reruns of Norman Lear's sitcoms -- are a mainstay of broadcast television. Liberals in other media have no trouble finding an audience. So why do they fail at talk radio?

A variant of the "entertainment" explanation is that talk radio thrives on easy demagoguery -- something at which the left, it is said, isn't skilled. "The popular view in the [radio] industry," reports The New York Times, is that "liberal hosts present issues in too much complexity." The dummies who tune in to talk shows, you see, can't handle complicated nuance and don't want to be confused with facts.

Yet anyone looking for simplistic sloganeering will have no trouble finding it on the left, where opposition to racial preferences is summed up as "racism," where every plan to ease the income tax burden is "tax cuts for the rich," and where those who want to liberate Iraq are in favor of spilling "blood for oil." From Ted Kennedy attacking Robert Bork to anti-globalization rioters attacking Starbucks, thoughtful argument is a luxury with which liberals frequently dispense.

So why don't liberals do better at talk radio? Three reasons:

  • Talk radio is listener-driven. Unlike television, newsmagazines, or the op-ed page, radio talk shows are interactive. The talkmaster may pick the subject, but anyone with a telephone can help determine what the audience gets to hear. No other medium is as open to public participation, which means that in no other medium is it as difficult to control the message. Conservatives may outnumber liberals in the public at large (as polls routinely show), but their views tend to get short shrift on the TV networks and in the daily paper. Only talk radio offers conservatives an unmediated chance to be heard. Not surprisingly, they flock to it.

  • Talk radio emphasizes words and argument. By contrast, television is focused on pictures and emotion. TV is a liberal bulwark because liberalism plays to feelings -- especially fear, envy, and pity. But success in radio requires an ability to engage with critics and actually answer their arguments. Sure, some liberals excel at debate, but too many simply deride those who disagree with them as fools or villains. You can't do that on talk radio and survive.

  • Talk radio is a reaction to Big Media. Liberals and Democrats can turn to a wide array of media outlets -- from CNN to Newsweek to National Public Radio -- and be fairly sure of seeing (or hearing) their own opinions echoed. But with few exceptions, the only mass-media option for those who want to hear a conservative take on things is talk radio. As the inimitable Jonah Goldberg, the online editor of National Review, puts it, "Talk radio serves as a truth squad for people who don't trust Peter Jennings." Right-leaning talkmasters give their audience something they can't find anywhere else. That's a big part of the reason for their success.

As a marketplace-of-ideas fan, I wish the left-wing investors the very best of luck in launching their radio enterprise. But if I had $10 million, I surely wouldn't be gambling it on something so risky.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe