Jewish World Review March 17, 2003 / 13 Adar II, 5763
THE UNITED NATIONS, RIP
"The American people understand," President Bush said at his March 6 news conference, "that when it comes to our
security, if we need to act we will act. And we really don't need the United Nations' approval to do so."
An obvious truth. But Bush must have thought it came off a bit tactless, because he immediately tried to dilute it with
some insincere UN boosterism:
"I want the United Nations to be effective," were his next words. "It's important for it to be a robust, capable body.
It's important for its words to mean what they say."
But of course the last thing Bush wants is for the UN, which dances now to an anti-American tune played by the
French and their fellow obstructionists, to be more muscular. And so, lest anyone listening to him get the wrong idea, he
promptly backtracked on his backtrack:
"And as we head into the 21st century, when it comes to our security, we really don't need anybody's permission."
What Bush knows but doesn't want explicitly to say is that the United Nations is finished. Oh, it isn't going to go out
of business any time soon -- the League of Nations wasn't formally dissolved until 1946 -- but it is finished as a force of
any consequence in world affairs, and it is finished as a body whose judgments serious people have reason to take
Last fall, Bush warned the UN that it would make its own downfall inevitable if it failed to support the US campaign
to disarm and depose Saddam Hussein.
"The conduct of the Iraqi regime is a threat to the authority of the United Nations, and a threat to peace," he said on
Sept. 12. "Iraq has answered a decade of U.N. demands with a decade of defiance. All the world now faces a test,
and the United Nations a difficult and defining moment. Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced,
or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?"
For a brief moment -- when the Security Council, after weeks of haggling over the text, unanimously passed
Resolution 1441 -- it was possible to believe that the UN intended to stand with the world's superpower and enforce its
own directives after all. But it is clear now that France, and perhaps China and Russia as well, never viewed 1441 as
anything but a way to buy more time -- time for the antiwar movement, and for that matter Saddam himself, to work at
undermining the US effort. The United Nations could have chosen to take part in bringing down one of the world's most
brutal tyrants. It chose instead to shred the last few strands of its own legitimacy.
Shed no tears. For all the beautiful words in its charter, the UN has never lived up -- never even tried to live up -- to
its founding ideals. The UN Charter venerates justice and human rights, but dozens of UN members states routinely
pervert justice and crush human rights. The stench of hypocrisy did not enter the United Nations when Qadhafi's Libya
was elected to chair the UN Human Rights Commission. Or when the UN responded to Serbian aggression by imposing
an arms embargo that crippled the victims. Or when Yasser Arafat addressed the General Assembly with a gun holster
on his hip.
In 1974, William F. Buckley fantasized about a United Nations in which hypocrisy was banned. In the epilogue to
United Nations Journal, which he wrote after serving a stint on the American delegation to the UN, he imagined a
takeover of the General Assembly by military officers attached to the UN Conference on Disarmament:
"In due course the UN colonels will issue their instructions, but already it is disclosed that the Soviet Union will not be
permitted to talk about disarming without disarming; the Chinese may not speak about human rights without granting
human rights; the Arabs will not be permitted to speak about the plight of the Less Developed Countries without
forswearing the cartelization of their oil; the Africans may not talk about racism until after subduing the leaders of
Uganda, the Central African Republican, and Burundi, for a starter.... The countries of East Europe must wear red
uniforms when they appear on the floor and, before rising to speak, must seek explicit and public permission from the
delegate of the Soviet Union."
Funny stuff, and even after 29 years, at least half of it is still apt. The UN has always been a treasure-trove for
satirists. But Bush isn't laughing anymore; after 9/11, some jokes aren't as comical as they used to be.
While the League of Nations fiddled in the 1930s, Italy invaded Abyssinia, Japan conquered Manchuria, and Hitler's
armies marched into the Rhineland. The League's fecklessness helped bring on the deadliest, most destructive war in
history. The United Nations in its fecklessness prolonged the Cold War and acquiesced in the rape of nations from
Tibet to Bosnia. Given the chance, it will fatally compromise the war against international terrorism and its sponsors.
Bush doesn't intend to give it the chance.
Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.
03/10/03: Changing the definition of marriage
03/07/03: Liberate Iraq -- even with unclean hands
03/03/03: Why talk radio tilts right
02/21/03: A boost for Saddam
02/10/03: On outing Kerry
02/06/03: The neverending voyage
02/03/03: This hasn't been a 'rush to war'
01/31/03: Killing the terror regimes
01/29/03: How not to win the war
01/24/03: The UN's moral irrelevance
01/22/03: Musings, random and otherwise
01/17/03: The Sharpton hypocrisy
01/13/03: The fig leaf of 'diversity'
01/10/03: Israeli restraint makes terrorism more likely
01/02/03: The double standard on political hate speech
12/30/02: Good for the spirit, good for the body
12/23/02: The college president who owes a greater duty to a fugitive serial killer than the public or to the law
12/20/02: The death penalty by the numbers
12/16/02: Yes, Virginia, there is (still) a liberal media bias
12/03/02: On the brink of regime change --- in Iran
11/27/02: Light's victory over darkness
11/25/02: A 'Republican' lesson from a Democratic convention
11/22/02: The slippery senator
11/18/02: The campus 'diversity' fraud
11/14/02: MURDER AT A KIBBUTZ
11/01/02: Saddam's shop of horrors
10/24/02: Musings, random and otherwise
10/17/02: Jimma's ignoble prize
10/14/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate
10/11/02: Today it is libs who are most likely to demand the silencing of speech they disapprove of
10/04/02: Learning English from Day 1
09/30/02: The world will follow us to war
09/27/02: The face of antisemitism
09/20/02: Starving time in Zimbabwe
09/14/02: Against moral confusion / 9-12-2002
09/03/02: With 'eternal friends' like these
08/30/02: Enriching survivors was a costly mistake
08/26/02: John Kerry's absent passion
08/23/02: Bonnie, get your gun
08/19/02: A screenwriter's remorse
07/29/02: The real abortion extremists
07/26/02: Another round of Kemp-Roth
07/19/02: Jews among Arabs, Arabs among Jews
07/15/02: Musings, random and otherwise
07/12/02: The new civil rights champions
07/03/02: Riding the rails
07/01/02: The prerequisite to peace
06/24/02: Frisking AlGore
06/17/02: Offense, not defense, is the key to homeland security
06/14/02: Looking at the horror
06/07/02: The cost of a death-penalty moratorium
06/03/02: Executing 'children,' and other death-penalty myths
05/29/02: A real threat?
05/24/02: The message in Arafat's headdress
05/20/02: (Mis)playing the popularity card
05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/08/02: STEVEN EMERSON AND THE NPR BLACKLIST
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/07/01: THE PALESTINIANS' MYTH
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/28/01: THE CENSORS ARE COMING! THE CENSORS ARE COMING!
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
01/05/01 THEY NEVER FORGOT THEE, O JERUSALEM
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore
© 2002, Boston Globe