Jewish World Review Sept. 17, 2001 / 28 Elul, 5761

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Calling evil by its name -- IN Jewish tradition, Rosh Hashanah is not only the start of the year, it is also the day of judgment, when G-d weighs our deeds, reads our hearts, and inscribes our fate for the year to come. The rabbis taught that on Rosh Hashanah our lives are hanging in the balance, and some of the most emotional parts of the liturgy deal with death: how terrible it can be, how suddenly it can come, how vulnerable it can find us.

"Who will live and who will die; who in his time and who before his time; who by water and who by fire; who by the sword and who by beast..."

The words are somber in the best of times. This year, with last week's horrors still so fresh and raw and ugly, they will take on an even more immediate grimness than many of us might otherwise have felt.

But not all of the Rosh Hashanah liturgy focuses on the here-and-now, and not all of it is grim. One recurring passage looks joyfully ahead, to the messianic era when "iniquity will shut its mouth, and all wickedness will disappear like smoke, for You will remove the reign of evil from the earth."

What that will be like -- a world in which evil has lost its power -- is hard to imagine. But then, we aren't being asked to imagine it or to dwell on it -- only to remind ourselves, as a new year gets under way, that one day redemption will come, and in the meantime we have work to do. It has never been the Jewish way to focus on the end times and give up on the present. G-d made the world -- on Rosh Hashanah, the sages said -- but He made it imperfect, a place with kindness, light, and love, but also with cruelty, darkness, and hate. G-d made the world, but it is our responsibility to make it better.

When we neglect that duty, the result, sooner or later, is catastrophe. Just look, for example, at the New York skyline.

Making the world better means, first of all, making ourselves better. It means being as preoccupied with our ethics as we are with our finances, as quick to worry about a blemish in our morals as we are about a blemish on our cars. It means recognizing that no part of parenting matters more than training children in decency. What happened last week in Manhattan and Washington was caused, among other things, by parents who didn't make the decency of their children their first priority.

But making the world better also means acknowledging that there are those who would make it worse. There are evil people who do evil things -- and evil organizations and evil regimes, too -- and we are obliged to point them out and fight them.

"O lovers of G-d, despise evil!" King David wrote in the 97th Psalm. That is hard enough to do under the best of circumstances. It is infinitely harder when the very notion of evil is jeered as archaic and unenlightened, when those who denounce evil behavior are themselves denounced as "intolerant" or "extremist" or "judgmental." What obloquy rained down on Ronald Reagan when he labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire." That Moscow ruled an empire no one disputed, that it was one of history's greatest engines of mass murder was beyond contradiction, but for Reagan to use the E-word was seen, in elite circles, as pathetically gauche.

Evil cannot be confronted unless it can first be identified, but for decades our culture has been preaching that good and evil are in the eyes of the beholder, matters of opinion, not fact. In The Chronicle of Higher Education a few years back, Hamilton College philosopher Robert Simon described the inability of his students to condemn great evils. "Of course I dislike the Nazis," one pupil told him, "but who is to say they are morally wrong?" At Harvard, James Q. Wilson found the same reluctance to call the Holocaust evil. As one of his students said, "It all depends on your perspective."

Even worse than treating evil as an issue of personal taste or as the product of incorrect thinking is treating it as glamorous or sexy or entertaining. Yet from rap songs about rape and cop-killing to TV talk shows that revel in human depravity, evil is winked at, indulged, celebrated. The inevitable result has been an erosion in our capacity to make moral judgments. We have trained ourselves not to judge the behavior of other people, or of other cultures. And as this swamp of nonjudgmentalism has spread, the world has grown ever more dangerous -- and Americans have grown ever more unwilling to make it safe.

Even terrorism has been cheerfully whitewashed. The New York Times last week ran a warm and admiring profile of Bill Ayers and his wife, two former members of the terrorist Weather Underground that carried out at least 12 bombings in the 1970s. "I don't regret setting bombs," begins the story on the front of the Arts section. "I feel we didn't do enough." The piece was occasioned by the publication of Ayers's memoir, a book in which he writes: "Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon."

The story appeared on Tuesday, Sept. 11 -- just in time for at least some readers in New York, Washington, or Pennsylvania to see it before terrorists killed them.

The choice, as always, is ours: To call evil by its name or to pretend not to see it, to excuse it and laugh it off or to face it and fight. As the year 5762 begins, let us resolve that the thousands who perished last week shall not have died in vain.

May their memory inspire us to make the world that remembers them better than the world they left.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2001, Boston Globe