Jewish World Review June 14, 2002/ 4 Tamuz, 5762

Marianne M. Jennings

Marianne M. Jennings
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The sum of all fears in vouchers | The Arizona Education Association, desert arm of the NEA, refused to endorse Arizona's current Superintendent of Public Instruction for re-election because Superintendent Jaime Molera is pro-choice, a voucher guy. A Milton Friedman disciple and free marketeer, he understands that competition increases quality and decreases price. No self-respecting teacher is going to let him get away with that prattle, studies aside.

In fact, a 2002 study by Harvard University, the University of Wisconsin, and Mathematica Policy Research, not exactly bastions of conservative thought, concludes that vouchers are to low-income children what Kaplan SAT review courses are to yuppie progeny. Dramatic improvements come from both.

After 3 years in private school, courtesy of the School Choice Scholarships Foundation, voucher students' reading scores were 9.2 percentile points higher than their counterparts left behind in public school squalor. Voucher kids' math scores are 11.80 percentile points higher. Even those students with just one year of voucher private school improve significantly. Some 1.2-million inner-city families now scramble for 40,000 vouchers.

And for all you believers in the great racial divide, vouchers are a bridge for your schism. The most dramatic improvement in voucher kids was among black children.

Education has not proven to be the great equalizer, but vouchers could be if these racist teachers would let them rip. But, as the AEA's shunning of incumbent Molera indicates, teachers won't support vouchers or elected officials who choose choice.

Worse than the refusal of vouchers opponents to accept the unassailable and embarrassing data is their hypocrisy. Even public school teachers have their children in private schools. One noted, "You can't get successful students out of the old model of public education." A 2002 Heritage Foundation study shows members of Congress, who never met a voucher program they wouldn't tank, to be private school junkies. Forty percent of the House and 49% of the Senate (compared to 10% of the general population) have their cherubs at the likes of Sidwell Friends and other snooty enclaves.

Leading the pack are Senators Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Edward Kennedy (D-Mass), and John D. Rockefeller (D-WVA), who voted against vouchers even as their children attend private schools tout a fait.

Lawmakers resist vouchers despite unequivocal evidence because teachers and their union, along with accompanying PAC funds, are the power behind their views. But, why do teachers fear vouchers and choice?

As the Senate Charlie McCarthys say for their ventriloquist educators, school choice "undermine[s] public schools." Of course school choice undermines public schools. That's the idea. Hopefully, vouchers would shut down half of the public schools, about the number that fail miserably in educating their charges.

Voucher opponents also offer up the trite argument that vouchers take money away from public schools. Of course they do, but they reduce public-school headcounts even as they deliver results for one- half to one-fourth the per-pupil cost of public schools. New York's Catholic schools deliver quality education for $2,300 per K-8 pupil and $5,500 for high school pupils. New York's public school budget per pupil is $9,739. But you get lower scores for that extra money.

So great is teacher fear of vouchers that they employ that irretractable sword of litigation, preferably in federal court where Carter and Clinton appointees are sympathetic to the preservation of public education's fiefdoms and abysmal status quo. Florida, with charter schools and vouchers, is besieged by litigious wenches of the classroom.

But, Florida is not alone in fighting the coup 'd grace of all voucher objections: violation of the establishment clause. A suit challenging the Cleveland voucher system that allows government funded-vouchers to be used for tuition at private religious schools is now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Court will have a tough time declaring such K-12 vouchers unconstitutional when Pell grants and federally-guaranteed student loans abound at SMU, BYU, and Notre Dame. The United States already has a voucher system that has spawned the finest system of higher education in the world, a thriving, growing, universal-access system with everything from community colleges to Ivy Leagues.

Teachers' fears of vouchers rest in job security, but such fears are unfounded. Additional data from Heritage also show that, with time, public schools improve under voucher systems. Vouchers create discomfort as monopolist schools and teachers realize competition's unforgiving demands for results. Teachers have choices under a voucher system: they can close down or they can get better. Too bad such an opportunity is declined by the ironically inaccurate sum of teachers' fears.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Marianne M. Jennings is a professor of legal and ethical studies at Arizona State University. Send your comments by clicking here.


06/06/02: Where was Agent Rowley when the FBI needed her?
05/30/02: Of big hair and sanity
05/24/02: Should I embrace liberalism?
05/20/02: Some passion about Israel
05/09/02: A mother who cares enough
05/02/02: Go ahead, pass judgment
04/29/02: The irritation of the modern wedding
04/18/02: Claire's life
04/15/02: Harvard takes off its pants one leg at a time
04/09/02: The Clinton legacy: Politics of personal destruction
03/31/02: Oscars' subtle bigotry was embarrassing
03/22/02: Blame Oprah, Rosie, Sally, Ted, David
03/14/02: The costs of women's feeble choices
03/08/02: Botoxic faces
02/28/02: The dangers of organized philanthropy
02/25/02: Don't take the gold
02/14/02: Ease up on the brothers and sisters
02/11/02: Because I was courted
02/05/02: Fat fault
01/24/02: Tolerance does not mean stupidity
01/17/02: Too old too soon
01/10/02: Ethically challenged firms
01/03/02: The year that was
12/27/01: The Twelve Days of inconsistency
12/20/01: Free Speech and the political spectrum
12/13/01: Curbing brats
12/06/01: Power to influence
11/29/01: The disappearing art of grading
11/21/01: The Big Two-Five
11/13/01: You can never find a lib when you need one
11/01/01: Unlucky in sports
10/26/01: An epidemic of counselitis
10/16/01: A touch of class
10/12/01: Of human nature and monsters
10/05/01: Sensitive man
10/01/01: Post-September 11 security
09/20/01: No tinhorn terrorists can frighten us
09/06/01: If there is no honor in youth sports, it is because of the adults
08/27/01: The draw of Condit
08/23/01: Lowering expectations and flying high
08/17/01: Thoreau, Walden and stems cells
08/13/01: Our masters: The animals
07/30/01: When principle hits too close to home
07/13/01: Rage born of sublimation
07/06/01: Patient's rights and the Valley of Death
06/29/01: There is no excuse
06/21/01: I want an eternal soulmate, but the marriage thing is another issue
06/14/01: Which way maverick McCain? An Arizonan's perspective
06/07/01: No stroke of genius
05/30/01: The lesson of the Mr. Green Jeans senator: 'Moderate' is a classy term for wishy-washy
05/25/01: Baseball has not been so good to me
05/18/01: Clothes make the woman
05/11/01: Selective precaution
05/04/01: Grades: Equality of students, by students, for the students
04/27/01: The Horowitz revelations as seen by a college professor
04/20/01: First, let's kill all the tests
04/13/01: The continuing mistake of underpricing electricity
04/06/01: That pill, Julia Roberts
03/29/01: If it weren't for the parents, we might accomplish something
03/23/01: The melt down of the academy
03/15/01: Columbine redux: Moral infants
03/09/01: The lessons of Tom and Nicole
03/01/01: Pardon the temporary outrage
02/23/01: In defense of homework
02/20/01: A Message for faith-based organizations: Don't take the money, just run
02/06/01: Enough already with the Clintoons
01/26/01: The challenge to be better than we have been
01/19/01: Where have you gone Frieda Pushnik?
12/29/00: The year that was
12/23/00: Litigation: It's the American way
12/15/00: In defense of rhetoric
12/06/00: The company we keep: Lawyers and elections
12/01/00: Liberals' art of trashing of women
11/20/00: Put me out of my misery
11/17/00: On being a statesman
11/13/00: When it's broke, fixing it wouldn't offend the Framers
11/08/00: ELECTION 2000: I SURRENDER
10/27/00: Al in the package? Memo to women: Choosing presidents and husbands
10/20/00: Ten things the gay community should understand
10/13/00: "You Have a Lump."
10/06/00: The government as the pharmacy: Don't
09/29/00: The capacity for truth
09/22/00: Charity with strings and an agenda
09/15/00: The taming of the shrew: Gloria Steinem takes a husband
09/09/00: Why rich folk don't bother me none
08/28/00: Survival of the not-so-fit but conniving
08/25/00: Conventions: A study in contrasts
08/18/00: Resenting the accusations of racial prejudice
08/04/00: Women: Their own worst enemy
07/21/00: Hillary: Our longshoreman First Lady
07/21/00: SUVs: The root of all evil
07/14/00: The basketball gene and white men not jumping so well
07/07/00: I wanna be around
06/23/00: The liberal conversion
06/14/00: Sex and the City: The shallow but vulgar female
06/08/00: No excuses schools
06/02/00: Oh, Canada: Our Nutty Neighbors to the North
05/23/00: The new mollycoddling coach
05/16/00: On adultery and leadership
05/12/00: Taking your lumps
05/02/00: Elian: There's never a liberal around when you need one
04/25/00: Life's circle and tenderness
04/18/00: Womyn who want it both ways
04/11/00: The monsters we're raising with the ergo proposition
04/05/00: Endowing the Hooters Chair for Literature Appreciation
03/28/00: Dr. Laura: The passive/aggressive kid's mom
03/21/00: Dough and campaigns
03/14/00: The volunteerism of conscription and pomp
03/07/00: Hope and pray that religion remains a force in politics
02/29/00: Ditzes in TV Land
02/22/00: Cranky nitpickers make writing a [sic] experience
02/15/00: Those chameleon 60s activists
02/08/00: McCandidate McCain: Flirting with principles
02/01/00: The demise of marriage
01/25/00: Stroke of the pen, law of the land: Clinton's Camelot
01/18/00: Off the Rocker Rorschach Test
01/11/00: Oprah's lemmings
01/04/00: Struggling mightily amidst the comfort
12/23/99: Confused fathers
12/14/99: Drop-kicking the homeless
12/07/99: Turtles and teamsters, side-by-side in Seattle
11/29/99: When conservatives behave badly
11/22/99: Compassionate conservative: Timing and targets
11/18/99: The elusive human spirit and accountability
11/11/99: Succumbing to the intellectual child within with the help of crackpots and screwballs
10/28/99: Live by litigation, die by litigation
10/22/99: Jesse, Warren, Cybill, Donald and Oprah
10/14/99: Inequality and injustice: It's the big one
10/05/99: Dan Quayle, morals and schoolyard bullies
09/30/99: The monsters of epidermal parenting
09/21/99: The Diversity Hoax
09/15/99: Waco Wackos
09/09/99: Selective censorship
09/01/99: The village, the children, judicial imperialism and abortion
08/24/99: Naughty Newt?
08/17/99: In defense of Boy Scouts and judgment
08/10/99: Ruining the finest health care system in the world
08/03/99: Nihilism and politics: ethics on the lam
07/26/99: Of women, soccer and removed jerseys
07/23/99: Not in despair, a mere mortal doing just fine
07/20/99: "Why me?" How about "Why us?"
07/13/99: Bunk, junk & juries
07/06/99: An Amish woman in a Victoria's Secret store
06/30/99: That intellectually embarrassing Second Amendment
06/24/99: Patricia Ireland eat your heart out --- but check out the recipe in 'women's mags' first
06/22/99: Dems and the Creator coup
06/17/99: True courage is more than just admitting troubles

© 2002, Marianne M. Jennings