|
Jewish World Review Dec. 28, 2000/ 2 Teves 5761
Kathleen Parker
Doesn't take village to see through this
http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
HOLIDAY GIFT-GIVING has produced at least one
unexpected and gratifying surprise -- resolution of the
ultimate mystery: How could she?
As in, how could Hillary Rodham Clinton put up with
the First Philanderer all those years? How could she
keep a straight face in describing The Vast Right Wing
Conspiracy while her husband continued to dishonor
her, repeatedly and publicly? Why, Hillary, oh why?
Now we know. Eight million buckaroos.
Hillary put up with Bill beyond what most reasonable
women would tolerate because not only was there light
at the end of the Lincoln Tunnel -- a likely U.S. Senate
seat -- but, reliably, a pot of gold. Tucked beneath that
stack of missing files that turned up on the first lady's
bedside table, no doubt, was a discreet little diary, the
first scribblings of an international best seller by the
most powerful woman on the planet.
But she shouldn't have. Hillary Clinton's imponderable
power has come from but one thing. Not her Incredible
Intellect; not her ability to schmooze people into believing she cares deeply about
their state even though she's never actually lived there; not her loyalty to family or
devotion to child.
What has made Hillary tolerable -- even likable at times to people who otherwise
opposed her -- was her appearance of class. Throughout Monicagate, she hugged
the high road no matter what the world and her husband dumped on her. She was
above it all.
No more. Accepting an exorbitant $8 million advance for a White House
confessional nullifies the effect of what she proudly accomplished by holding her
head high. Her contract-to-tell tarnishes the image of moral superiority and
confirms instead: Everything's for sale.
Of course, we don't know how much Hillary will actually reveal. Pre-writing, she
has said her book will include a dignified discussion of the events surrounding the
Lewinsky-Lollapalooza. Nevertheless, publisher Simon & Schuster must be
betting people will buy the book on the suggestion, if not the promise, of a little
X-rated outrage.
My own bet is Hillary won't tell enough to justify either the stunning advance we
all covet or even a $4.95 paperback. She'll continue to hold her cards close, to
protect Chelsea, if no one else. Which is to say, her book -- overfinanced,
overhyped and probably overpriced -- will be a disappointment. Such a tease. So
feminine, Hill!
Meanwhile, the advance raises questions about Hillary's ability to perform in the
Senate. Although she squeezed by Senate rules, which allow advances that fall
within what's considered "usual and customary" in the industry, one might
reasonably question whether she can objectively weigh issues in which her
publisher's parent company, Viacom, has a strong interest.
Even if Senator Hillary is neutral in reality, the perception may be that she's been
sleeping with the enemy.
In typical Clintonian fashion, Hillary is technically within legal, if not ethical,
bounds. But to her beloved populist constituency, for whom $8 million is an awful
lot of dough (excepting the Hollywood crowd), she's playing a risky game. As
Caesar's wife knew, you must not only be above suspicion, you must appear to
be above suspicion.
To promise to pawn your deepest pain for $8 million -- a Faustian deal that may
bedevil Hillary in days to come -- is to abandon the high road for a lesser path
and to risk the loss of moral capital for which even $8 million may prove
inadequate
compensation.
JWR contributor Kathleen Parker can be reached by clicking here.
12/26/00: Guess who's whining about Bush's Cabinet of Diversity?
12/21/00: Kiss our coarse era goodbye
12/19/00: Ready to lay to rest the past and press onward
12/13/00: Court has Supreme authority
12/06/00: Legal relief: Attorneys in Florida court are welcome shift
12/04/00: When rules become flexible, children misbehave
11/29/00: Hard to forgive Dems' divisiveness
11/23/00: The answers aren't so complicated
11/21/00: The devil -- or is it really Nurse Ratchet? -- in Mr. Gore
11/16/00:In the end, the winner may be loser
11/13/00: Eliminate popular vote -- at least in Palm Beach County
11/07/00: Lesser of 2 evils? It's more like the lesser of 2 lies
11/02/00: Latest Jones' saga exposes a big irony
10/31/00: Hate-crime legislation and anti-Bush ad are flawed
10/26/00: Taking it to the streets
10/23/00: Headlines blur fiasco of family
10/13/00: Forget polls: Bush passes turtle test
10/06/00: Feminism: A cup that's half full?
10/04/00: Election-year reality check: Abortion is here to stay
09/29/00: For Gore and Hollywood, the mirror has two faces
09/26/00: Oprahfication of presidential political: It's all about feelings
09/19/00: It's not subliminal: Hypocrisy of moral outrage is obvious
09/15/00: So wear, oh wear, are we headed?
09/11/00: Do Steinem's wedding bells sound feminist death knells?
09/08/00: Grounded in her fears about flying
08/31/00: Dudettes that don't
08/29/00: AlGore wants to be his own man -- does he know who that is?
08/21/00: Dems manufacture emotions at convention
08/17/00: Hollywood divine? AlGore is miscast
08/08/00:Outreach: Good strategy and long-run policy
08/04/00: A sharp look back at the Vietnam War
08/01/00: Bush's choice of grown-up Cheney is a stroke of genius
07/24/00: Fired up and grossed out over stupid Canadians
07/20/00: Lack of judgment --- our critical flaw
07/18/00: 'Progress' for women often a step back
07/11/00: School essay watchdogs cannibalize our children
07/06/00: Youths fear marriage --- blame boomers
06/28/00: Eminem might just have a point
06/21/00: Bridging the day-care divide
06/15/00: N.Y. baby case ends up with multiracial scrambled eggs
05/31/00: The war only time wins
05/25/00: The opposite of sex
05/18/00: World War II gave us our true heroes
05/11/00: Boy Crazy! stacks deck against guys
05/09/00: Finding out where the boys are
05/05/00: A born Ms. Leader -- Barbie for prez
04/25/00: From here to paternity
04/14/00: Boys should be boys, not viewed as criminals in training
04/11/00: Oh, for a standard of what is socially, morally acceptable
04/06/00: Womyn's Contempt for Commitment --- and the bastards it creates
04/04/00: Sue-happy American society is out of control
03/30/00: Duct-taped baby serves as warning
03/28/00: Stay-home parents know that their kids need them
03/24/00: No 'Great Expectations' when schools shun the classics
03/21/00: It's common sense to restrict Internet usage in libraries
03/17/00: You want to be just a mom? For shame!
03/14/00: Colonoscopy: Important, but bad TV
03/10/00: I made a mistake about trigger-locks
03/08/00: After this school shooting, no easy target for our contempt
03/03/00: Car crash helps bridge our divide
02/28/00: Nasty politics? Americans like it down, dirty
02/14/00: College testing via
Lego-building -- yeah, right
02/02/00: Bubba should spare us phony love theatrics
01/26/00: What sets off Those Who Speak for Women
01/13/00: Fools in love: Premarital counseling could help school kids
01/11/00: Who funds these studies!?
12/29/99: Grandparents' rights impinge on family autonomy
12/13/99: When did fathers become fair game?
12/09/99: Don't be stupid about at-risk kids
12/07/99: Pokemon is no substitute for a father
12/02/99: Blaming the victim --- men
11/30/99: Baby-killer's story has less-than-Precious ending
11/23/99: Pendulum swings back toward discipline, responsibility
11/18/99: Put the babies first in this mighty mess
11/11/99: Skip the applause for this baby news
11/09/99: Gore could benefit from a secret in Wolf's clothing
11/03/99: Who needs 'birds and bees' when we have MTV?
11/01/99: Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say
10/26/99: Children's needs must take priority in divorce system
10/19/99: The deadbeat dad is less a scoundrel than an object of pity
10/15/99: Bullying boys ... and girls
10/12/99: Divorced dads ready to wage a revolution
10/04/99: A father's best gift? His presence
09/30/99: Sorry, guys, Faludi is no friend of yours
09/28/99: Science's new findings: Scary future for families
09/23/99: The great blurring of need and want
09/21/99:Focus on more than baby's first 3 years
09/16/99: Commentary from kids sheds no light on day-care debate
09/14/99: Fathers' group seeks to right inequities
09/09/99: Son now has a license to grow up
09/07/99: A slap in the face of domestic violence
09/01/99: No, ma'am: Legislation on manners misses the mark
08/26/99: For better boys, try a little tenderness
08/24/99:The ABC's of campaign questions
08/19/99: Male 'sluts'
08/11/99: Language doesn't excuse bad behavior
08/09/99: When justice delayed is still justice
08/03/99: Unemployment? Not in this profession
07/30/99: It's not about race -- it's about crack babies
07/22/99: Tragedy tells us what's important
07/19/99: Study denouncing fathers sends danger signals
07/15/99:'Happy marriage' belongs in the
Dictionary of Oxymorons next to 'deliciously low-fat.'
07/11/99: 'Brother Man': An American demagogue in Paris
07/08/99: Only parents can fix broken families
07/06/99: America is home, sweet home
07/01/99: Tales out of Yuppiedom
06/28/99: Men aren't the only abusers
06/23/99: Is the entire country guzzling LSD punch?
06/20/99: The voice remains -- as always -- there beside me
06/16/99:Stating the obvious, a new growth industry
06/14/99: Calling for a cease-fire in the gender war
06/10/99: We owe children an apology
©1999, Tribune Media Services
|