Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World ReviewMarch 14, 2000/ 7 Adar II, 5760

Kathleen Parker

Kathleen Parker
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Newswatch

Econophone

Trakdata


Colonoscopy: Important, but bad TV

http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
Drat. Scooped again.

Here I was looking forward to writing a detailed account of my recent colonoscopy, and what do you know? I turn on TV, take a mouthful of colon-friendly shredded wheat, and there's Katie Couric's colon pulsating on the screen.

You early morning commuters may have missed Katie's colon, but consider the bright side: You kept your breakfast.

Katie, as everyone knows, is the adorably perky co-host of the "Today" show who not long ago lost her husband, Jay Monahan, to colon cancer. I'm sorry, truly.

She's cute; he was handsome; they were rich in all things: children, money, glamour, career. At 42, Monahan was too young to die.

We, the public, watched Katie grieve. We noted that she wore her husband's wedding band on a chain around her neck. Now we're watching her colon.

The show, which aired March 7, showed Katie talking to the doctor, getting garbed for the procedure, getting garbled by the Demerol, then getting, well, um, scoped.

Yes, there we were, a nation mesmerized by the incredible image of a doctor probing Katie's colon, while fiber-optics on the tip of the scope projected Katie's insides on a screen. Katie's colon is not her best look. Why did Katie do this? In a word, there isnothing Katie, the earnest widow and now high priestess of colon communication, won't do to advance the cause of colon cancer prevention.

As causes go, this one's noble. So are efforts to prevent all other cancers and degenerative diseases. But is there a point past which one need not go in one's enthusiasm for The Public Good? Does the public's need to know extend to the celebrity colon?

Katie's explanation is that she wants to dispel people's irrational fears of colonoscopy. She hoped to demonstrate that if lil' ol' Katie can do it, anybody can. And, well, yes you can. The drugs work, the procedure ain't that bad, and colon cancer detected early is usually curable. There, now, see how easy that was?

I've actually had a colonoscopy myself, and mentioned it briefly in a magazine article several years ago. Colonoscopies, I opined at the time, are the real reason Wyatt Earp always kept his back to the wall.

I realize that my telling you to go have a colonoscopy isn't as effective as showing you the interior of my colon, but those are the breaks. I'm certain that my mother, had she lived long enough, would have told me at some point that I should never, ever, ever - under any circumstances - expose my colon in public.

I also realize that we, the obsequiously sympathetic public, never criticize widows trying to do the right thing. But, well, I gotta be me. And, let's face it, when one exposes one's posterior interior on TV, one is not to be ignored.

In this horrid new world of bare-anything exhibitionism, we are privy to everyone's everything, from the prez's anatomical distinctions to Bob Dole's penile dysfunction and, now, Katie's colon.

Does this mean, one wonders, that we may look forward to, say, a Jane Pauley Pap smear? You know how women dread those unpleasant excavations. Perhaps we could get a little walk through:

"Now, to your right, you'll notice some disgusting red papules. Ignore those and, oops, watch your heads, we've got some drooping fallopians up ahead." Sort of a variation on Disney's Voyage Through the Human Body. On acid.

The possibilities are fathomless.


JWR contributor Kathleen Parker can be reached by clicking here.

Up

03/10/00: I made a mistake about trigger-locks
03/08/00: After this school shooting, no easy target for our contempt
03/03/00: Car crash helps bridge our divide
02/28/00: Nasty politics? Americans like it down, dirty
02/14/00: College testing via Lego-building -- yeah, right
02/02/00: Bubba should spare us phony love theatrics
01/26/00: What sets off Those Who Speak for Women
01/13/00: Fools in love: Premarital counseling could help school kids
01/11/00: Who funds these studies!?
12/29/99: Grandparents' rights impinge on family autonomy
12/13/99: When did fathers become fair game?
12/09/99: Don't be stupid about at-risk kids
12/07/99: Pokemon is no substitute for a father
12/02/99: Blaming the victim --- men
11/30/99: Baby-killer's story has less-than-Precious ending
11/23/99: Pendulum swings back toward discipline, responsibility
11/18/99: Put the babies first in this mighty mess
11/11/99: Skip the applause for this baby news
11/09/99: Gore could benefit from a secret in Wolf's clothing
11/03/99: Who needs 'birds and bees' when we have MTV?
11/01/99: Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say
10/26/99: Children's needs must take priority in divorce system
10/19/99: The deadbeat dad is less a scoundrel than an object of pity
10/15/99: Bullying boys ... and girls
10/12/99: Divorced dads ready to wage a revolution
10/04/99: A father's best gift? His presence
09/30/99: Sorry, guys, Faludi is no friend of yours
09/28/99: Science's new findings: Scary future for families
09/23/99: The great blurring of need and want
09/21/99:Focus on more than baby's first 3 years
09/16/99: Commentary from kids sheds no light on day-care debate
09/14/99: Fathers' group seeks to right inequities
09/09/99: Son now has a license to grow up
09/07/99: A slap in the face of domestic violence
09/01/99: No, ma'am: Legislation on manners misses the mark
08/26/99: For better boys, try a little tenderness
08/24/99:The ABC's of campaign questions
08/19/99: Male 'sluts'
08/11/99: Language doesn't excuse bad behavior
08/09/99: When justice delayed is still justice
08/03/99: Unemployment? Not in this profession
07/30/99: It's not about race -- it's about crack babies
07/22/99: Tragedy tells us what's important
07/19/99: Study denouncing fathers sends danger signals
07/15/99:'Happy marriage' belongs in the Dictionary of Oxymorons next to 'deliciously low-fat.'
07/11/99: 'Brother Man': An American demagogue in Paris
07/08/99: Only parents can fix broken families
07/06/99: America is home, sweet home
07/01/99: Tales out of Yuppiedom
06/28/99: Men aren't the only abusers
06/23/99: Is the entire country guzzling LSD punch?
06/20/99: The voice remains -- as always -- there beside me 06/16/99:Stating the obvious, a new growth industry
06/14/99: Calling for a cease-fire in the gender war
06/10/99: We owe children an apology

©1999, Tribune Media Services