Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 18, 2001/ 25 Nissan 5761

Kathleen Parker

Kathleen Parker
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Encouraging marriage makes good political sense

http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
PRESIDENT Bush's new family initiatives, which promote such antiquated notions as marriage and fatherhood, have the Rad Fems in high dudgeon, charging that the seedpods now occupying the White House are fundamentally sexist.

As part of a multipronged program aimed at encouraging marriage, Bush proposes doubling the child tax credit and reducing the marriage penalty in the tax code. Some even are talking about adding marriage bonuses to the tax code, financial incentives to get married and stay married.

"They're suggesting that the way for women to get out of poverty is to get a husband, and we oppose that notion," said Loretta Kane, a National Organization for Women vice president. As for a marriage bonus, Kane said: "When you've got a guy saying we should give preferential treatment to marriage, that tells me there's a vein of sexism running through his politics."

It is of course true that marriage and fatherhood, as normally defined, do imply involvement of a male. But marriage, though oftentimes tedious, difficult and exhausting, isn't inherently sexist unless both parties agree. (You can just say no, honey, or slam the door on your way out.)

Likewise, fatherhood isn't innately patriarchal in the feminist sense or oppressive, unless you marry the wrong guy, but whose fault is that?

Strictly speaking, trying to help restore solid families and involve fathers in the lives of the offspring they've sired seems like a dandy idea that might actually benefit many of the women NOW purports to represent.

Given the quantity of research showing that family breakdown is the single greatest cause of poverty for women and children, one might infer that finding ways to sustain marriage is at least worth considering. Getting married before having children is also a pretty good idea, though you wouldn't know it to judge from recent trends.

By 1997, 26 percent of white infants were born to unmarried mothers, compared to just 2 percent in 1960, according to a new book on American trends, The First Measured Century: An Illustrated Guide to Trends in America 1900-2000 (paperback) and (hardcover).

Among black Americans, the comparable figure was 69 percent in 1997 compared to less than 25 percent in 1960.

Yet we also know from research and common sense that children who grow up without fathers suffer a number of social pathologies that might be remedied with a little more help from dear old dad. Girls without fathers grow up with self-esteem problems that often lead to promiscuity, which leads to unwanted pregnancy, which leads to another fatherless child and government dependence and another cycle of same.

Ditto boys, who, absent fathers, tend to behave badly, perform poorly in school and learn little about civil behavior toward women.

Shouldn't a responsible government seek ways to enhance father-child relationships rather than only impose draconian policies to punish those who behave irresponsibly? Doesn't it make sense that a responsible government might seek ways to stop the cycle (insert Father here) rather than institutionalize it?

Critics of Bush's proposals say that he's inappropriately trying to mold private behavior through public policies that contradict promises of less government. Of course, government programs mold behavior (see welfare state), so why not an agenda that promotes positive behavior?

Bush's programs are only contradictory, meanwhile, in the knee-jerk, short term. Ultimately, they're predicated on planned obsolescence. Any government wishing to sustain itself would ignore the root causes (broken families) and seek Band-Aid solutions (government programs). One nurtures dependence on government; the other seeks to eliminate government's paternal role.

Bush may not be able to get some of his programs through Congress for constitutional or other reasons, but he shouldn't be stymied by charges of sexism. If by their absence or neglect men have contributed to the breakdown of America's families, by all means, let them fix it.


JWR contributor Kathleen Parker can be reached by clicking here.

Up

04/10/01: Wage-gap equation is calculated on spurious assumptions
04/04/01: Angry little yuppie children
03/28/01: Overzealous policies make all men targets
03/26/01: Protecting newborns with compassion
03/22/01: Be careful: Here comes the son
03/19/01: Student should have been allowed to draw gun ... with a pen
03/15/01: American dream lives in Havana?
03/12/01: School shootings: It isn't so much the "R"-rated movies and video games ...
02/26/01: Fathers fight paternity fraud
02/21/01: Clarence Thomas is a courageous patriot with guts to spare
02/16/01: Trapping dads
02/13/01: Oh, for the sweet strains of 'How can I help you?'
02/08/01: Age is mostly a function of attitude
01/31/01: No class
01/26/01: Let's listen to children of divorce
01/23/01: If we could read Jackson's mind during prayers for Clinton ...
01/18/01: Don't look for lesson in this tale
01/15/01: It's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it
01/08/01: Middle-school fanny slap or sexual assault? You decide
12/28/00: Doesn't take village to see through this
12/26/00: Guess who's whining about Bush's Cabinet of Diversity?
12/21/00: Kiss our coarse era goodbye
12/19/00: Ready to lay to rest the past and press onward
12/13/00: Court has Supreme authority
12/06/00: Legal relief: Attorneys in Florida court are welcome shift
12/04/00: When rules become flexible, children misbehave
11/29/00: Hard to forgive Dems' divisiveness
11/23/00: The answers aren't so complicated
11/21/00: The devil -- or is it really Nurse Ratchet? -- in Mr. Gore
11/16/00:In the end, the winner may be loser
11/13/00: Eliminate popular vote -- at least in Palm Beach County
11/07/00: Lesser of 2 evils? It's more like the lesser of 2 lies
11/02/00: Latest Jones' saga exposes a big irony
10/31/00: Hate-crime legislation and anti-Bush ad are flawed
10/26/00: Taking it to the streets
10/23/00: Headlines blur fiasco of family
10/13/00: Forget polls: Bush passes turtle test
10/06/00: Feminism: A cup that's half full?
10/04/00: Election-year reality check: Abortion is here to stay
09/29/00: For Gore and Hollywood, the mirror has two faces
09/26/00: Oprahfication of presidential political: It's all about feelings
09/19/00: It's not subliminal: Hypocrisy of moral outrage is obvious
09/15/00: So wear, oh wear, are we headed?
09/11/00: Do Steinem's wedding bells sound feminist death knells?
09/08/00: Grounded in her fears about flying
08/31/00: Dudettes that don't
08/29/00: AlGore wants to be his own man -- does he know who that is?
08/21/00: Dems manufacture emotions at convention
08/17/00: Hollywood divine? AlGore is miscast
08/08/00:Outreach: Good strategy and long-run policy
08/04/00: A sharp look back at the Vietnam War
08/01/00: Bush's choice of grown-up Cheney is a stroke of genius
07/24/00: Fired up and grossed out over stupid Canadians
07/20/00: Lack of judgment --- our critical flaw
07/18/00: 'Progress' for women often a step back
07/11/00: School essay watchdogs cannibalize our children
07/06/00: Youths fear marriage --- blame boomers
06/28/00: Eminem might just have a point
06/21/00: Bridging the day-care divide
06/15/00: N.Y. baby case ends up with multiracial scrambled eggs
05/31/00: The war only time wins
05/25/00: The opposite of sex
05/18/00: World War II gave us our true heroes
05/11/00: Boy Crazy! stacks deck against guys
05/09/00: Finding out where the boys are
05/05/00: A born Ms. Leader -- Barbie for prez
04/25/00: From here to paternity
04/14/00: Boys should be boys, not viewed as criminals in training
04/11/00: Oh, for a standard of what is socially, morally acceptable
04/06/00: Womyn's Contempt for Commitment --- and the bastards it creates
04/04/00: Sue-happy American society is out of control
03/30/00: Duct-taped baby serves as warning
03/28/00: Stay-home parents know that their kids need them
03/24/00: No 'Great Expectations' when schools shun the classics
03/21/00: It's common sense to restrict Internet usage in libraries
03/17/00: You want to be just a mom? For shame!
03/14/00: Colonoscopy: Important, but bad TV
03/10/00: I made a mistake about trigger-locks
03/08/00: After this school shooting, no easy target for our contempt
03/03/00: Car crash helps bridge our divide
02/28/00: Nasty politics? Americans like it down, dirty
02/14/00: College testing via Lego-building -- yeah, right
02/02/00: Bubba should spare us phony love theatrics
01/26/00: What sets off Those Who Speak for Women
01/13/00: Fools in love: Premarital counseling could help school kids
01/11/00: Who funds these studies!?
12/29/99: Grandparents' rights impinge on family autonomy
12/13/99: When did fathers become fair game?
12/09/99: Don't be stupid about at-risk kids
12/07/99: Pokemon is no substitute for a father
12/02/99: Blaming the victim --- men
11/30/99: Baby-killer's story has less-than-Precious ending
11/23/99: Pendulum swings back toward discipline, responsibility
11/18/99: Put the babies first in this mighty mess
11/11/99: Skip the applause for this baby news
11/09/99: Gore could benefit from a secret in Wolf's clothing
11/03/99: Who needs 'birds and bees' when we have MTV?
11/01/99: Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say
10/26/99: Children's needs must take priority in divorce system
10/19/99: The deadbeat dad is less a scoundrel than an object of pity
10/15/99: Bullying boys ... and girls
10/12/99: Divorced dads ready to wage a revolution
10/04/99: A father's best gift? His presence
09/30/99: Sorry, guys, Faludi is no friend of yours
09/28/99: Science's new findings: Scary future for families
09/23/99: The great blurring of need and want
09/21/99:Focus on more than baby's first 3 years
09/16/99: Commentary from kids sheds no light on day-care debate
09/14/99: Fathers' group seeks to right inequities
09/09/99: Son now has a license to grow up
09/07/99: A slap in the face of domestic violence
09/01/99: No, ma'am: Legislation on manners misses the mark
08/26/99: For better boys, try a little tenderness
08/24/99:The ABC's of campaign questions
08/19/99: Male 'sluts'
08/11/99: Language doesn't excuse bad behavior
08/09/99: When justice delayed is still justice
08/03/99: Unemployment? Not in this profession
07/30/99: It's not about race -- it's about crack babies
07/22/99: Tragedy tells us what's important
07/19/99: Study denouncing fathers sends danger signals
07/15/99:'Happy marriage' belongs in the Dictionary of Oxymorons next to 'deliciously low-fat.'
07/11/99: 'Brother Man': An American demagogue in Paris
07/08/99: Only parents can fix broken families
07/06/99: America is home, sweet home
07/01/99: Tales out of Yuppiedom
06/28/99: Men aren't the only abusers
06/23/99: Is the entire country guzzling LSD punch?
06/20/99: The voice remains -- as always -- there beside me 06/16/99:Stating the obvious, a new growth industry
06/14/99: Calling for a cease-fire in the gender war
06/10/99: We owe children an apology

©1999, Tribune Media Services