Jewish World Review August 10, 2004 / 25 Menachem-Av, 5764
Jonathan Turley
These soldiers refuse to take their infamy into
self-imposed exile
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
The soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company recently came home from
Iraq and some are pretty angry. Made infamous by the abuses at Abu Ghraib
prison, they have been caricatured as a bunch of thuggish yahoos from the
hills of West Virginia and Maryland. Now their entire unit may be
deactivated.
They seem, however, unwilling to go quietly, taking their infamy into
self-imposed exile.
I first learned about the 372nd a year ago. One of my students, Richard
Murphy, had been sent to Iraq after his first year of law school. When
Murphy called me just before he entered Iraq, he said his parents had sent
him body armor because his unit had been given out-of-date Vietnam-era flak
jackets. I learned that 40,000 other soldiers in Iraq lacked either the
vests or the essential ceramic plates, and I wrote columns that focused
national attention on the problem.
When the Abu Ghraib prisoner-abuse scandal hit, the 372nd was suddenly the
focus of international coverage. Stories detailed the broken family
histories of some of the accused guards, including sexual affairs and wife
beatings. Defendant Pvt. Lynndie England, featured in some of the most
shocking pictures, was reported to be carrying the child of another
defendant, Spec. Charles Graner Jr. Both appear in sexually explicit
photos. England's military pretrial hearing created additional shockwaves
this past week.
As for the other soldiers, they feel as if they've been made to look like
recruits from a Jerry Springer show, "hicks with sticks." It did not matter
that few of these soldiers had contact with "Tier 1," where military
intelligence held special prisoners. It did not matter that other tiers (not
under the supervision of military intelligence) appear to have been run in a
professional and humane fashion. None of that mattered because none of that
fit the spin. The abuses were portrayed as the isolated product of some
whacked-out white trash who became savages the moment social controls were
loosened.
The return of troops can always be a mixed blessing for politicians. They
can return with new perspectives and difficult questions about the planning
and purpose of a war. Putting aside Abu Ghraib, the 372nd was a microcosm of
the problems experienced by many soldiers in Iraq.
Members of the 372nd did not expect to serve beyond a year in Iraq. They
were extended twice. From the outset of their deployment, they discovered
that they would have to fend for themselves without essential equipment. In
addition to not being issued the modern Kevlar vests, the 372nd discovered
that it would be given unarmored Humvees to drive through some of the most
violent areas of Iraq. Then the unit was told to ride guard duty for a
Halliburton subsidiary. The soldiers rode next to truck drivers making
$70,000 a year three times their salaries to protect the deliveries of
this private company. Murphy said he felt like a rent-a-guard for a
mega-conglomerate that could afford its own security force.
Despite these experiences, the 372nd took pride in getting the job done. The
soldiers guarded trucks traveling more than 100,000 miles through hostile
Iraqi territory. They trained about 2,000 police officers. And, yes, they
ran Abu Ghraib for six months. They offer a different story from the "other
tiers," including how they fought for better food and conditions for
detainees. None of that mattered after the pictures from the prison.
Now, they've come home with many questions: Unit members say they want to
know why their families had to buy their body armor. They want to know why
they were given Humvees with the protection of a Ford Pinto. They want to
know why they were required to guard private trucks. More important, they
may want to know why they've been made the scapegoats of this scandal.
This week, 372nd troops were awarded Purple Hearts, but they are coming home
with more than medals on their minds.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor JJonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George
Washington University Law School.
Click here to visit his website. Comment by clicking here.
08/10/04: These soldiers refuse to take their infamy into self-imposed exile
07/19/04: The lost art of the apology
06/21/04: The Supremes ducked a definitive decision in a ruling that raises questions about future child-custody issues
05/19/04: This roughhousing at recess must cease
05/04/04: A Peddler of Court Gossip May Pay the Piper
04/01/04: One angry Tyco juror does not make twelve angry men
03/23/04: When choice becomes tyranny
03/18/04: Valued bond between client, lawyer eroding
03/12/04: When Silence Isn't Golden: Martha Stewart's failure to testify holds a lesson for other celebrity defendants
03/09/04: Non-profits' executives avoid scrutiny, valid reforms
02/12/04: Reparations cause is coming up empty: Potential lawsuits destined to remain meritless in courts
02/03/04: Senate powder is the least of Congress' security concerns
01/29/04: Case of the Missing Evidence: Facts are often withheld from juries, which can lead to ill-informed
verdicts
12/31/03: Celebrity is often its own best defense
12/27/03: U.S. soldiers lack best protective gear
12/17/03: Going for the gold in a competition of the corrupt
11/25/03: Will Malvo jurors spare life of young suspect?
11/11/03: The Black Tax: Of charlatans, crooks and victims and the reparations scam
11/04/03: Sniper case lacks appeal, public lessons of other cases
10/02/03: Is a soldier's life worth more than $650?
08/26/03: One justice wields too much power on today's Supreme Court. It's time to make the top bench much bigger
08/11/03: Don't let jobs grow on family trees
06/26/03: A Ruling That Only Goldilocks Could Love; We still don't know how much weight to give race in college admissions
06/24/03: 'Educating' Congress at the hands of lobbyists
06/12/03: Crooked arm of the law
06/10/03: Defense on lay-away
05/23/03: Innocence doesn't pay, either
05/15/03: A see-no-evil parole system
05/08/03: An American Gulag?
05/01/03: CUNY Law gives grads a cynical parting gift
04/22/03: Congress Must Send Spammers a Message
04/16/03: End Apartheid in the State Prisons
04/07/03: NBC's sacking of Peter Arnett over a critical analysis plays well in Baghdad
03/07/03: Rights on the Rack: Alleged torture in terror war imperils U.S. standards of humanity
02/25/03: How democracy could clear our snowy streets
02/11/03: Sanity and Justice Slipping Away
01/28/03: Quit horsing around, senator
01/14/03: Public Payroll: a Family Affair; Nepotism in Washington poses a threat to institutional integrity
01/09/03: DARPA and democracy
12/24/02: The 13th juror
12/19/02: Back to the admissions morass
12/10/02: Pro-Choice at Expense of Free Speech; NOW case against abortion protester may backfire
12/02/02: A cruel bait and switch for vets
11/15/02: Junk justice
11/07/02: OUR second-class soldiers
10/30/02: 'Quirin' revisited: The dark history of a military tribunal
10/22/02: Un-American Arrests: Mass detainments of the innocent may be the ultimate form of crowd control, but the tactic is unconstitutional
10/16/02: Reverse pawn shops? Broke state officials across the country have been looking for businesses to buy their assets at a fraction of their worth to pay for budget shortfalls
10/08/02: A legal tattoo hullabaloo
10/02/02: Gagged justice sets dangerous precedent
09/25/02: The Great Salmon Rose Caper
09/17/02: Reparations: A Scam Cloaked in Racial Pain
09/12/02: This country's hidden strength
09/04/02: 1st Amendment protects even the ugliest among us
08/28/02: A secret court goes public
08/20/02: I defended Ashcroft during his nomination; he's become a constitutional menace
08/07/02: San Francisco embracing states-rights
07/31/02: Who needs Jenny Craig when you can have Johnnie Cochran?
07/22/02: The meaning of justice and the madness of Zacarias Moussauoi
07/16/02: The President vs. the Presidency
07/08/02: How one woman's whims dictates the rights of millions
07/02/02: Just say 'no' to extracurricular activities
06/24/02: Missing Ted Bundy
06/14/02: DESTROYING A FAMILY TO SAVE IT
06/10/02: A comedy of eros06/14/02:
05/31/02: Beyond the 'reformed FBI' hype
05/23/02: Do we really need a Federal Marriage Amendment?
05/19/02: No "battlefield detainee" should leave home without a U.S. birth certificate
05/10/02: The perfect constitutional storm
04/26/02: 'Slave of Allah' wounds justice
04/12/02: The importance of being nameless
04/05/02: The adjusted value of justice
03/18/02: How Clinton got off: A law professor's take
03/11/02: Profiling and the terrorist lottery
03/05/02: Yes, Sharpton, there was a failure of justice
02/28/02: The Lay of the land
02/14/02: Living in constitutional denial
02/05/02: Legal Lesson for Afghanistan: War's Not a Slip-and-Fall Case
01/25/02: Sever "Jihad Johnny"'s ties to his homeland
01/21/02: "Out of sight, out of mind," but they're still prisoners
01/14/02: Your papers, please!
01/07/02: Prescription for disaster
12/18/01: Madison and the Mujahedeen
12/07/01: In the U.S., espionage crime is easy to understand but difficult to prove
11/19/01: What type of 'creature' would defend bin Laden?
11/19/01: Could bin Laden be acquitted in a trial?
10/28/01: The ultimate sign of the different times in which we are living
10/25/01: Al-Qaida produces killers, not thinkers
09/28/01: The Boxer rebellion and the war against terrorism
08/31/01: Bring back the silent Condit
08/27/01: Working out the body politic
© 2003, Jonathan Turley
|