Jewish World Review Dec. 17, 2003 / 22 Kislev, 5764
Going for the gold in a competition of the corrupt
In the Olympics, it is traditional to name a new move after the first athlete to perform it — like the "Salchow" jump for skaters, named after 1908 Olympic skater Ulrich Salchow of Sweden. This month, another Olympic trial was held and two Americans emerged victorious with a move that should be recorded in future trials as "a Welch and Johnson."
For those who missed it, that's Tom Welch and Dave Johnson, the former president and senior vice president of the Salt Lake Olympic bid and organizing committee. The two had been charged with 15 counts of bribery and fraud for allegedly buying off Olympic officials to make Salt Lake City the site of the 2002 Winter Olympics.
However, in a never-before-seen maneuver, they managed to persuade a federal judge to dismiss their case not by denying making huge payments of cash or gifts but by arguing that such conduct was entirely appropriate in the thoroughly corrupt world of the International Olympic Committee.
In perhaps the ultimate sign of our times, the same sort of claim is being attempted by defendants in the New York trial involving Tyco Corp. In the face of allegations of greed and self-dealing, former corporate officials have sought to be judged according to the standards of their morally delinquent peers. In other words, in a community of the corrupt, there can be no such thing as a dishonest man.
For the Salt Lake organizers, this taste for vice did not appear naturally but was acquired after years of dealing with the IOC. After Salt Lake lost the 1998 Olympics to Nagano, Japan, the organizers concluded that the Japanese had effectively bought the honor through gifts to IOC members. Johnson reportedly wrote a report saying that, although they knew that there were corrupt IOC members, they had wrongly assumed that there were enough "pure" members to guarantee a fair result.
They vowed to change their approach before the 2002 Games, and Johnson allegedly promised to pay "special attention
to certain people" to secure the Games for Salt Lake. His defense attorney explained to the jury that the defendants had realized that it would take more than "saltwater taffy and jars of honey" to convince the good people of the IOC.
How much more would be required became apparent in the trial. The jury heard testimony of envelopes stuffed with cash, expensive hotels, car repairs, college tuition, family vacations and even cancer treatment for a member. As much as $1 million may have been forked over to hungry members of the IOC.
Indeed, Johnson and Welch allegedly assembled a 25-page "geld file," listing IOC members and the personal pleasures that they wanted satiated by Salt Lake. For his vote, the Congolese IOC delegate reportedly received $320,000 in cash, first-class travel, shopping sprees and a Rolex watch.
But here's the problem in the case: The victim, according to prosecutors, was the overall Salt Lake Olympic Committee, for which Welch and Johnson worked. But the SLOC could hardly feign a lack of knowledge when most of the payments were documented by the defendants and one-fourth of the alleged bribes were made by the committee after Welch was replaced. This included payment of tuition and living expenses for the son of an IOC member from Libya.
Viewed in isolation, the evidence appears to offer little room for a defense. Yet when it comes to Olympic ambitions, context is everything. The defense essentially asked whether it is possible to commit a conspiracy when everyone knows about it, or in Zen-like phraseology, if a conspiracy occurs in Salt Lake and everyone can see it, does a conspiracy exist? According to the judge, it does not.
This same metaphysical question is being presented in the Tyco case, where former Tyco Chief Executive L. Dennis Kozlowski is charged, with others, of bilking the firm to pay for luxury lifestyles. The jury watched a video of a $2-million birthday party for Kozlowski's wife (half of which was paid for by Tyco) at an Italian resort. Guests were flown to other cities for cooking lessons and like distractions. All told, the $600 million in alleged looting would appear to seal the fate of Kozlowski and his corporate cabal. However, in a corrupt world, he has argued, context is everything.
As in the Olympic trial, Kozlowski's lawyers insisted that you cannot commit larceny in the open. In other words, Kozlowski's corruption was so huge and flagrant that it was
honest. Indeed, his attorney promised the jury: "You will be surprised
how many people
were aware of the money he supposedly stole."
As for Welch and Johnson, they were saved by the corruption of strangers. Welch's attorney insisted that, because it was so open and accepted, this was not "a process of bribery" but merely "a process of excess."
Of course, when Oscar Wilde stated that "nothing succeeds like excess," he never imagined that it would be converted into a legal defense. Yet, in Salt Lake City and New York City, defendants have embraced open excess as the very proof of honesty.
In these cases, the government seemed to struggle to find a single innocent person to cast the first stone. Its witnesses imploded on the stand when pressed on their own practices.
The Oscar Wilde defense would be more difficult if the government were proceeding against entire corrupt organizations and not just a few executives. By portraying the Olympic Committee and Tyco as victims, they appeared to be prosecuting Ali Baba on the testimony of the 40 thieves.
Ultimately, the true culprit in Salt Lake City was the IOC itself. If the IOC were a union, it would be treated as controlled by organized crime and put under federal supervision. Yet no one wants to take on the IOC.
The IOC has, not surprisingly, declared itself "pure" after shedding prior members and adopting new ethics rules. It is now seeking bids for a future Olympic site, so it can again invite all well-heeled suitors to "let the games begin."
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and a practicing criminal defense attorney. Click here to visit his website. Comment by clicking here.
11/25/03: Will Malvo jurors spare life of young suspect?
11/11/03: The Black Tax: Of charlatans, crooks and victims and the reparations scam
11/04/03: Sniper case lacks appeal, public lessons of other cases
10/02/03: Is a soldier's life worth more than $650?
08/26/03: One justice wields too much power on today's Supreme Court. It's time to make the top bench much bigger
08/11/03: Don't let jobs grow on family trees
06/26/03: A Ruling That Only Goldilocks Could Love; We still don't know how much weight to give race in college admissions
06/24/03: 'Educating' Congress at the hands of lobbyists
06/12/03: Crooked arm of the law
06/10/03: Defense on lay-away
05/23/03: Innocence doesn't pay, either
05/15/03: A see-no-evil parole system
05/08/03: An American Gulag?
05/01/03: CUNY Law gives grads a cynical parting gift
04/22/03: Congress Must Send Spammers a Message
04/16/03: End Apartheid in the State Prisons
04/07/03: NBC's sacking of Peter Arnett over a critical analysis plays well in Baghdad
03/07/03: Rights on the Rack: Alleged torture in terror war imperils U.S. standards of humanity
02/25/03: How democracy could clear our snowy streets
02/11/03: Sanity and Justice Slipping Away
01/28/03: Quit horsing around, senator
01/14/03: Public Payroll: a Family Affair; Nepotism in Washington poses a threat to institutional integrity
01/09/03: DARPA and democracy
12/24/02: The 13th juror
12/19/02: Back to the admissions morass
12/10/02: Pro-Choice at Expense of Free Speech; NOW case against abortion protester may backfire
12/02/02: A cruel bait and switch for vets
11/15/02: Junk justice
11/07/02: OUR second-class soldiers
10/30/02: 'Quirin' revisited: The dark history of a military tribunal
10/22/02: Un-American Arrests: Mass detainments of the innocent may be the ultimate form of crowd control, but the tactic is unconstitutional
10/16/02: Reverse pawn shops? Broke state officials across the country have been looking for businesses to buy their assets at a fraction of their worth to pay for budget shortfalls
10/08/02: A legal tattoo hullabaloo
10/02/02: Gagged justice sets dangerous precedent
09/25/02: The Great Salmon Rose Caper
09/17/02: Reparations: A Scam Cloaked in Racial Pain
09/12/02: This country's hidden strength
09/04/02: 1st Amendment protects even the ugliest among us
08/28/02: A secret court goes public
08/20/02: I defended Ashcroft during his nomination; he's become a constitutional menace
08/07/02: San Francisco embracing states-rights
07/31/02: Who needs Jenny Craig when you can have Johnnie Cochran?
07/22/02: The meaning of justice and the madness of Zacarias Moussauoi
07/16/02: The President vs. the Presidency
07/08/02: How one woman's whims dictates the rights of millions
07/02/02: Just say 'no' to extracurricular activities
06/24/02: Missing Ted Bundy
06/14/02: DESTROYING A FAMILY TO SAVE IT
06/10/02: A comedy of eros06/14/02:
05/31/02: Beyond the 'reformed FBI' hype
05/23/02: Do we really need a Federal Marriage Amendment?
05/19/02: No "battlefield detainee" should leave home without a U.S. birth certificate
05/10/02: The perfect constitutional storm
04/26/02: 'Slave of Allah' wounds justice
04/12/02: The importance of being nameless
04/05/02: The adjusted value of justice
03/18/02: How Clinton got off: A law professor's take
03/11/02: Profiling and the terrorist lottery
03/05/02: Yes, Sharpton, there was a failure of justice
02/28/02: The Lay of the land
02/14/02: Living in constitutional denial
02/05/02: Legal Lesson for Afghanistan: War's Not a Slip-and-Fall Case
01/25/02: Sever "Jihad Johnny"'s ties to his homeland
01/21/02: "Out of sight, out of mind," but they're still prisoners
01/14/02: Your papers, please!
01/07/02: Prescription for disaster
12/18/01: Madison and the Mujahedeen
12/07/01: In the U.S., espionage crime is easy to understand but difficult to prove
11/19/01: What type of 'creature' would defend bin Laden?
11/19/01: Could bin Laden be acquitted in a trial?
10/28/01: The ultimate sign of the different times in which we are living
10/25/01: Al-Qaida produces killers, not thinkers
09/28/01: The Boxer rebellion and the war against terrorism
08/31/01: Bring back the silent Condit
08/27/01: Working out the body politic
© 2003, Jonathan Turley