Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 8, 2002 / 2 Mar-Cheshvan , 5763

Jonathan Turley

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

A legal tattoo hullabaloo | Few people can say that when they come to work in the morning they feel closer to the Creator. In my case, this may have something to do with the multicolored tattoo of the Virgin Mary that extends from my secretary's neck to her right elbow.

This week, Kelly's iconic arm could have been an exhibit in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court. At issue was whether tattooing is a protected form of religious or political speech under the Constitution. It was a case that could have triggered as many generational as constitutional conflicts.

In White vs. South Carolina, the Supreme Court decided against accepting an appeal from a tattoo artist, Ronald White, or allow his criminal conviction for unlawful tattooing to stand. In a single act of defiance in 1999, White was transformed from an obscure tattoo practitioner to the virtual Martin Luther of "body artists." Opposed to South Carolina's ban on tattooing, he decided to do the modern equivalent of nailing his grievance to a cathedral door: He tattooed a man on local TV.

That act cost him a criminal conviction, five years' probation and a fine. White has picked up some strange allies along the way, including former independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who joined White as counsel.

Though tattooing has been around for thousands of years, the popular acceptance of body art is relatively new to the West. One can only imagine the reaction of Pope Julius II if Michelangelo suggested his holy derriere would make a better "canvas" than the Sistine Chapel. However, the 1st Amendment protects the right of expression and not the specific forms of expression.

As our artistic and political forms of expression evolve, the Constitution protects each new medium with the same vigor as the first. As hard as it may be for some of us to accept, tattooing was found by one court in Massachusetts to be "the most commonly purchased form of original artwork in the United States." This is not the view in South Carolina, or, for that matter, Oklahoma--the only other state that outlaws the practice. South Carolina state Sen. J.M. Knotts explained that tattoos are against G-d's will because "if G-d wanted you to have a tattoo, he'd have put your name on you."

For its part, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that, though a tattoo might be a form of protected expression, the "process" of tattooing was not protected. This is akin to treating the Declaration of Independence as protected speech but not Benjamin Franklin's printing of the document.

The court based its decision in part on the belief that tattooing poses a public health danger, a view common in the 1960s after a hepatitis outbreak linked to a Coney Island tattoo parlor. However, the Food and Drug Administration has found that it is "not aware of any immediate hazards to health associated with the use of tattoo equipment" and that the most common problem is simple customer dissatisfaction.

Virtually all states have rescinded or struck down their bans (including Massachusetts in a judicial decision in 2000).

Any walk along the beach reveals the range of artistic and political expression found in the rising number of tattoos. Like any other medium of speech, the quality of tattoo speech ranges from the profound to the moronic. Just as you will find the ubiquitous Goth images, you will also find an assortment of political and religious expressions ranging from the American flag to crosses to, most recently, the memorial tattoos found on many of the surviving New York firefighters.

Starr may have been the ideal individual to show a relatively stodgy group of justices that a new generation has embraced an ancient form of expression. He could have saved much of his argument with a simple quotation from Marx--Groucho, not Karl. Marx's signature song was about "Lydia the Tattooed Lady," who was "suited," in today's parlance, with a full body of images. Marx describes how, with a little movement, various historical scenes, like Washington crossing the Delaware, would come to life: "Lydia, oh, Lydia, that encyclopedia, Lydia the queen of tattoos / On her back is the battle of Waterloo, beside it the wreck of the Hesperus, too / And proudly above waves the red, white and blue / You can learn a lot from Lydia."

The only question is whether nine unadulterated justices can learn a lot from Lydia.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Jonathan Turley is a constitutional law professor at George Washington University. Comment by clicking here.

10/02/02: Gagged justice sets dangerous precedent
09/25/02: The Great Salmon Rose Caper
09/17/02: Reparations: A Scam Cloaked in Racial Pain
09/12/02: This country's hidden strength
09/04/02: 1st Amendment protects even the ugliest among us
08/28/02: A secret court goes public
08/20/02: I defended Ashcroft during his nomination; he's become a constitutional menace
08/07/02: San Francisco embracing states-rights
07/31/02: Who needs Jenny Craig when you can have Johnnie Cochran?
07/22/02: The meaning of justice and the madness of Zacarias Moussauoi
07/16/02: The President vs. the Presidency
07/08/02: How one woman's whims dictates the rights of millions
07/02/02: Just say 'no' to extracurricular activities
06/24/02: Missing Ted Bundy
06/10/02: A comedy of eros06/14/02: 05/31/02: Beyond the 'reformed FBI' hype
05/23/02: Do we really need a Federal Marriage Amendment?
05/19/02: No "battlefield detainee" should leave home without a U.S. birth certificate
05/10/02: The perfect constitutional storm
04/26/02: 'Slave of Allah' wounds justice
04/12/02: The importance of being nameless
04/05/02: The adjusted value of justice
03/18/02: How Clinton got off: A law professor's take
03/11/02: Profiling and the terrorist lottery
03/05/02: Yes, Sharpton, there was a failure of justice
02/28/02: The Lay of the land
02/14/02: Living in constitutional denial
02/05/02: Legal Lesson for Afghanistan: War's Not a Slip-and-Fall Case
01/25/02: Sever "Jihad Johnny"'s ties to his homeland
01/21/02: "Out of sight, out of mind," but they're still prisoners
01/14/02: Your papers, please!
01/07/02: Prescription for disaster
12/18/01: Madison and the Mujahedeen
12/07/01: In the U.S., espionage crime is easy to understand but difficult to prove
11/19/01: What type of 'creature' would defend bin Laden?
11/19/01: Could bin Laden be acquitted in a trial?
10/28/01: The ultimate sign of the different times in which we are living
10/25/01: Al-Qaida produces killers, not thinkers
09/28/01: The Boxer rebellion and the war against terrorism
08/31/01: Bring back the silent Condit
08/27/01: Working out the body politic

© 2002, Jonathan Turley