Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 14, 2002 / 4 Tamuz , 5762

Jonathan Turley

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

DESTROYING A FAMILY TO SAVE IT | By all accounts, Kevin Kelly is a loving father who worked hard to support his large family in Manassas, Virginia. The father of thirteen children, Kelly was doing sole duty last week when his youngest, a 19-month-old baby girl, was accidentally left in the family van. She was later found dead. When most families would be attempting to cope with such a horrific loss, the Kelly family was hit this week with another unimaginable blow. Commonwealth Attorney Paul B. Ebert has announced that he intends to charge Kelly with involuntary manslaughter, a charge that could send him to prison for 15 years.

Ebert stated that he wanted to send a message to all parents. Indeed he did. Kelly's prosecution sends a chilling message of prosecutorial over-reach and abuse. Unfortunately, it is not unique. Increasingly, prosecutors appear to be expressing their outrage over parental negligence through criminal charges, leaving terrible consequences in their wake.

The disaster that struck the Kelly family occurred last week when Kelly was watching the children while his wife and one of his daughters were taking a vacation in Ireland. When the family returned home in their fifteen-seat van, Kelly enlisted his oldest teenagers to help get all twelve kids into the house. One of the teenagers removed the family's three-year-old daughter, but forgot the youngest 19-month-old daughter in the van. Kelly assumed that everyone was in the house as he did chores and bought dinner for the family. Seven hours later, they found the child dead in the closed van.

This was not the first time that Kelly has lost track of one of his thirteen kids. Previously, he left one of his sons at a videostore and did not realize that the boy was missing until contacted hours later by the store. However, no one has suggested that Kelly knowingly left his baby daughter in the van and both parents are described as deeply religious and supportive parents. This is a case of negligence but not a crime. Criminal cases have long been confined to parents who knowingly put their children at obvious risk; physically abused their children; engaged in drug or criminal activities; or showed a history of child neglect.

Ebert does not allege such criminal elements. Nevertheless, Ebert insists that "this case is bigger than Mr. Kelly." Ebert insists that a prosecution of the father is necessary so that "other people will get the message that gross negligence . . . is something that can be prosecuted." To that end, Ebert stated that he has not decided whether to also criminally charge the teenage daughter as part of his family learning through prosecution policy.

Criminal justice is generally based on one of two objectives: retribution or deterrence. Neither objective will be achieved by prosecuting this grieving father. In terms of retribution, there is no penalty that can possibly extract the costs of losing a child due to personal negligence. As for deterrence, Ebert's belief that prosecution will "send a message" is bizarre. Ebert's lingering threat is not going to cause parents to be more attentive or less forgetful. You send a message to criminals who act deliberately. Parents are not going to begin to put failsafe protections into effect because, in addition to losing the most valuable thing in their lives, Ebert may seek his own brand of punishment.

Ebert is not the first prosecutor to use criminal law to punish parental negligence. In 2000, Paul Wayment was charged criminally after he left his sleeping son in his truck while he hunted. The boy wandered away and was later found dead in the forest. Even the prosecutors admitted that Wayment was not simply a good father but a father totally engrossed in his son. He took his son everywhere and was devastated by the loss. The prosecutors decided to charge but specifically asked the judge not to send the man to jail.

However, Utah state judge Robert Hilder decided that he had not suffered enough. The judge told him that he would be sent to jail to consider what he had done. It did not take long. Wayment left the court, went to the spot in the mountains where his son was found, and committed suicide. To this day I am convinced that it was not jail but the suggestion that he lacked remorse that proved too much for him. Neither a judge nor a prosecutor was needed to get Wayment to consider what he had done. It would be the defining moment of his life, an agony that only a parent can appreciate. Wayment committed a thoughtless, if not moronic, act in leaving that child in his truck. However, in doing so, he imposed a self-sentence that was absolute and unappealable.

We have become a society that seems incapable of expressing its most fundamental values without a criminal charge. Prosecution has become a type of exclamation point for social judgments. However, in the Wayment and the Kelly cases, such prosecutions only victimize the grieving to satisfy the vengeful. It is the prosecutorial version of ambulance chasing. Faced with a high-profile death, prosecutors yield to a temptation to express their own views of the parental negligence, as if such a view was in doubt or needed.

Ebert clearly believes that if he hoists a wretch, he can improve child care in Virginia. There is something to this logic that reminds one of the Vietnam technique of destroying a village to save it. Here, the state will respond to the tragic loss of this child by destroying the family. It will first drain what little funds are available to this large family and then, if successful, it will send the family's only breadwinner to jail. Ebert insists that "this is bigger than Mr. Kelly." Not to his family, Mr. Ebert. Before the state victimizes this family in our name, the public needs to send its own "message" to those who cannot distinguish between true justice and gratuitous punishment.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Jonathan Turley tJonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. Comment by clicking here.

06/10/02: A comedy of eros
05/31/02: Beyond the 'reformed FBI' hype
05/23/02: Do we really need a Federal Marriage Amendment?
05/19/02: No "battlefield detainee" should leave home without a U.S. birth certificate
05/10/02: The perfect constitutional storm
04/26/02: 'Slave of Allah' wounds justice
04/12/02: The importance of being nameless
04/05/02: The adjusted value of justice
03/18/02: How Clinton got off: A law professor's take
03/11/02: Profiling and the terrorist lottery
03/05/02: Yes, Sharpton, there was a failure of justice
02/28/02: The Lay of the land
02/14/02: Living in constitutional denial
02/05/02: Legal Lesson for Afghanistan: War's Not a Slip-and-Fall Case
01/25/02: Sever "Jihad Johnny"'s ties to his homeland
01/21/02: "Out of sight, out of mind," but they're still prisoners
01/14/02: Your papers, please!
01/07/02: Prescription for disaster
12/18/01: Madison and the Mujahedeen
12/07/01: In the U.S., espionage crime is easy to understand but difficult to prove
11/19/01: What type of 'creature' would defend bin Laden?
11/19/01: Could bin Laden be acquitted in a trial?
10/28/01: The ultimate sign of the different times in which we are living
10/25/01: Al-Qaida produces killers, not thinkers
09/28/01: The Boxer rebellion and the war against terrorism
08/31/01: Bring back the silent Condit
08/27/01: Working out the body politic

© 2002, Jonathan Turley