Jewish World Review Dec. 27, 2003 / 1 Teves, 5764
U.S. soldiers lack best protective gear
I recently received a note from one of the few husbands who knows just what his wife wants
as a holiday gift. The Army sergeant (who asked to remain anonymous) e-mailed me from Iraq
asking my help in finding him a store to buy body armor for his wife.
Both the sergeant and his wife are serving in Iraq, and both have seen action. But, like
thousands of U.S. soldiers, his wife was not given the vital ceramic plates for her Kevlar
Interceptor vest to protect her from bullet wounds. Instead, he said, she had to scavenge to
find plates left behind by Iraqi soldiers plates of inferior quality that do not properly
fit her vest.
The Pentagon confirms that at least 40,000 of the 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq don't have
basic Kevlar Interceptor vests or the ceramic plates needed for full protection.
As a law professor, I am more comfortable researching legal briefs than body armor, but I
was thrown into this controversy in early September when I received a call from Richard Murphy,
one of my students during his first year of law school. I wasn't surprised to hear from
Richard, but I was a bit surprised that he was calling from Iraq. His Army Reserve unit had
been called up, so he had taken a leave from school to serve. What came as a greater surprise
was that Richard's mother had mailed him body armor because his entire unit was issued
Vietnam-era flak jackets that are designed to stop shrapnel rather than bullets. The
Interceptor vest can stop AK-47 rounds moving 2,750 feet a second.
Army Spc. John Fox must appreciate the difference. He was hit in the stomach by an AK-47
while on patrol in September in Fallujah. He was one of the lucky soldiers with a vest. The
bullets set off three ammunition magazines and a smoke grenade he was carrying, The Washington
Post reported. The vest protected him from the AK-47 rounds and the explosion of his own
ammunition and grenade.
I first assumed that Murphy's unit was a mix-up. Then I called retailers and manufacturers
of body armor and was told that they had been deluged by such orders from the families of
A Pentagon procurement officer then told me Interceptor vests were "non-priority" items,
like tents. Accordingly, the military had decided to slowly phase out the old flak jackets in a
one-for-one exchange program over 10 years. We invaded Iraq in the fifth year.
After I wrote about this shortage in a September column, I received
dozens of e-mails and calls from troops in Iraq giving their own accounts. Some wrote that they
had taped plates on the backs of their flak jackets to try to get some protection. Other units,
they wrote, shifted the available vests from soldier to soldier.
This "swap and share" approach has forced soldiers in American and British units to play a
dangerous version of Russian roulette. The first British death in the war occurred after Sgt.
Steve Roberts was forced to give up his plates and was then shot in the chest while on patrol,
according to The London Daily Telegraph.
Sgt. Zachariah Byrd from Colorado was luckier. Shortly before his unit was ambushed, a
friend gave him his Interceptor vest. Byrd was hit four times by fire from an AK-47 and
survived only because of the last-minute swap.
At a September House hearing, Gen. John Abizaid, head of all military forces in Iraq,
admitted he could not give House members a good reason "why we started this war with protective
vests that were in short supply."
This left parents and spouses to buy body armor for their loved ones. Murphy's mother, an
elementary school teacher in Sciota, Pa., spent $ 650 to buy the protective plates. A Marin
County, Calif., National Guard unit was outfitted with body armor donated by local law
Pentagon officials told me they hope to have all of our troops in Iraq equipped with vests
and plates in January almost a year after we invaded Iraq.
Obituaries and news accounts raise the disturbing prospect that we have had soldiers
seriously wounded or killed due to the shortage of body armor. Many note wounds to the chest
and stomach areas areas that might have been protected by the Interceptor vests and plates.
What is baffling is what the military was doing during the years since the previous Iraqi
war. For at least a year before the current conflict, it was aware that an invasion of Iraq was
likely, if not certain.
In response to questions about the lack of body armor, acting Secretary of the Army Les
Brownlee simply stated that the attacks in Iraq "differed from our expectations." But we give
Kevlar vests to our police to patrol our cities. Why would the military think it safer for our
troops to move around Baghdad than for a cop to walk around Boise?
Despite requests from a few members of Congress, there appears to be little movement to
investigate the shortage of what seems to be a basic protective item for our troops. Capitol
Hill politicians now have left for holiday vacations. When they return next month, they might
want to give these troops more thought and consider whether we sent them into harm's way but
failed to outfit them with a basic item that could help keep them alive.
As for the sergeant, he finally located a set of plates for his wife on the Internet. He
just hopes that it arrives quickly so they both can look forward to the New Year.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor J Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington
University. Click here to visit his website. Comment by clicking here.
12/17/03: Going for the gold in a competition of the corrupt
11/25/03: Will Malvo jurors spare life of young suspect?
11/11/03: The Black Tax: Of charlatans, crooks and victims and the reparations scam
11/04/03: Sniper case lacks appeal, public lessons of other cases
10/02/03: Is a soldier's life worth more than $650?
08/26/03: One justice wields too much power on today's Supreme Court. It's time to make the top bench much bigger
08/11/03: Don't let jobs grow on family trees
06/26/03: A Ruling That Only Goldilocks Could Love; We still don't know how much weight to give race in college admissions
06/24/03: 'Educating' Congress at the hands of lobbyists
06/12/03: Crooked arm of the law
06/10/03: Defense on lay-away
05/23/03: Innocence doesn't pay, either
05/15/03: A see-no-evil parole system
05/08/03: An American Gulag?
05/01/03: CUNY Law gives grads a cynical parting gift
04/22/03: Congress Must Send Spammers a Message
04/16/03: End Apartheid in the State Prisons
04/07/03: NBC's sacking of Peter Arnett over a critical analysis plays well in Baghdad
03/07/03: Rights on the Rack: Alleged torture in terror war imperils U.S. standards of humanity
02/25/03: How democracy could clear our snowy streets
02/11/03: Sanity and Justice Slipping Away
01/28/03: Quit horsing around, senator
01/14/03: Public Payroll: a Family Affair; Nepotism in Washington poses a threat to institutional integrity
01/09/03: DARPA and democracy
12/24/02: The 13th juror
12/19/02: Back to the admissions morass
12/10/02: Pro-Choice at Expense of Free Speech; NOW case against abortion protester may backfire
12/02/02: A cruel bait and switch for vets
11/15/02: Junk justice
11/07/02: OUR second-class soldiers
10/30/02: 'Quirin' revisited: The dark history of a military tribunal
10/22/02: Un-American Arrests: Mass detainments of the innocent may be the ultimate form of crowd control, but the tactic is unconstitutional
10/16/02: Reverse pawn shops? Broke state officials across the country have been looking for businesses to buy their assets at a fraction of their worth to pay for budget shortfalls
10/08/02: A legal tattoo hullabaloo
10/02/02: Gagged justice sets dangerous precedent
09/25/02: The Great Salmon Rose Caper
09/17/02: Reparations: A Scam Cloaked in Racial Pain
09/12/02: This country's hidden strength
09/04/02: 1st Amendment protects even the ugliest among us
08/28/02: A secret court goes public
08/20/02: I defended Ashcroft during his nomination; he's become a constitutional menace
08/07/02: San Francisco embracing states-rights
07/31/02: Who needs Jenny Craig when you can have Johnnie Cochran?
07/22/02: The meaning of justice and the madness of Zacarias Moussauoi
07/16/02: The President vs. the Presidency
07/08/02: How one woman's whims dictates the rights of millions
07/02/02: Just say 'no' to extracurricular activities
06/24/02: Missing Ted Bundy
06/14/02: DESTROYING A FAMILY TO SAVE IT
06/10/02: A comedy of eros06/14/02:
05/31/02: Beyond the 'reformed FBI' hype
05/23/02: Do we really need a Federal Marriage Amendment?
05/19/02: No "battlefield detainee" should leave home without a U.S. birth certificate
05/10/02: The perfect constitutional storm
04/26/02: 'Slave of Allah' wounds justice
04/12/02: The importance of being nameless
04/05/02: The adjusted value of justice
03/18/02: How Clinton got off: A law professor's take
03/11/02: Profiling and the terrorist lottery
03/05/02: Yes, Sharpton, there was a failure of justice
02/28/02: The Lay of the land
02/14/02: Living in constitutional denial
02/05/02: Legal Lesson for Afghanistan: War's Not a Slip-and-Fall Case
01/25/02: Sever "Jihad Johnny"'s ties to his homeland
01/21/02: "Out of sight, out of mind," but they're still prisoners
01/14/02: Your papers, please!
01/07/02: Prescription for disaster
12/18/01: Madison and the Mujahedeen
12/07/01: In the U.S., espionage crime is easy to understand but difficult to prove
11/19/01: What type of 'creature' would defend bin Laden?
11/19/01: Could bin Laden be acquitted in a trial?
10/28/01: The ultimate sign of the different times in which we are living
10/25/01: Al-Qaida produces killers, not thinkers
09/28/01: The Boxer rebellion and the war against terrorism
08/31/01: Bring back the silent Condit
08/27/01: Working out the body politic
© 2003, Jonathan Turley