Jewish World Review Jan. 31, 2001 / 8 Shevat, 5761
The Teamsters, the DNC and the
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN and Senate Democrats are all hot to trot over the prospect of finally enacting "meaningful" campaign finance reform legislation. The "reformers'" zeal would be easier to understand if they were similarly exercised over violations of existing laws.
Two items currently in the news may just give us an indication of how committed to reform some of the reformers are. Last week, a federal grand jury indicted former Teamster President Ron Carey on various charges centered on his alleged involvement in (and statements about) illegal fund-raising activities connected to his 1996 re-election campaign for presidency of the union. This week, Clinton friend and fund-raiser extraordinaire, Terry McAuliffe, will probably be elected chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
What do these two stories have to do with each other, you ask? Quite a bit, actually. There is strong evidence to suggest that Democratic fund-raisers masterminded much of the illegal campaign activity of the Teamsters. If Democrats were truly interested in reform, they would think long and hard before installing Clinton confidante McAuliffe to their top fund-raising post.
I'm not alleging that McAuliffe engaged in criminal activity; I don't know. His lawyer says that McAuliffe has been assured that he is not a target of the government's investigation. But, as U.S. News & World Report notes, "there's no way prosecutors can lay out the Teamsters' tangled money mess without referring to the troubled 1996 Democratic fundraising machine."
The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee investigating the campaign finance scandal reported that labor unions and their political action committees spent more than $119 million during the 1996 election cycle on political contributions. This was made possible only by an aggressive, coordinated effort by the White House, the Clinton-Gore campaign and the DNC to entice labor to contribute unprecedented sums. Let me explain:
The Teamsters supplied vast sums of money (and manpower) to Democrats in 1992, but the union's internal problems began to drain its resources following the 1992 election. In 1995, as the Clinton-Gore campaign was gearing up for the 1996 election, the White House began to devise ways to reinvigorate the Teamsters' enthusiasm for the Clinton-Gore re-election effort.
One White House document, entitled "Teamster Notes," detailed a not-so-subtle strategy to trade policy promises for union dollars. According to the document, "It is in our best interest to develop a better relationship with Carey. ... Carey is not a schmoozer -- he wants results on issues he cares about. The Diamond Walnut strike and the organizing effort at Pony Express are two of Carey's biggest problems. We should assist in any way possible."
Reportedly, the White House did take action to assist, and it paid off. William Hamilton, the Teamsters' government affairs director, in a March 14, 1996, memo, acknowledged Clinton's hands-on policy assistance on countless issues and recommended the Teamsters endorse Clinton. "It's also a fact," wrote Hamilton, "that we ask for and get, on almost a daily basis, help from the Clinton administration for one thing or another. But let's understand each other. We need Bill Clinton, and Bill Clinton needs us. Every day we get help in small ways from Bill Clinton -- he makes a phone call, he uses the veto threat, he makes an appointment. ..."
Rekindling the Teamsters' loyalty was only half the battle. The DNC still had to conceive of a plan to free up additional Teamsters' money and resources. No problem. The DNC would arrange for a quid pro quo with the Teamsters. They would each indirectly funnel money to the other in what the Senate committee referred to as a "contribution-swap scheme." The DNC would arrange for a $100,000 illegal foreign donation to Carey's re-election campaign, and in return, the Teamsters would direct $1 million to state Democratic parties.
Ultimately, these activities resulted in criminal convictions for three of Carey's top campaign aides who entered guilty pleas in September 1997 to criminal fraud and conspiracy charges. In 1999, William Hamilton was also convicted for his involvement. Witnesses at Hamilton's trial reportedly implicated McAuliffe in the scheme.
Now that Ron Carey has been indicted, Republican Congressman Peter Hoekstra, chairman of the House subcommittee that investigated Carey's fund-raising, is suggesting that it's time for McAuliffe to come forward with an explanation of his role in these sordid events.
Will the "reformers" go ahead and install McAuliffe, or will they demand some
commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
01/29/01: The Old Limey
01/25/01: Clintonís disgraceful departure
01/22/01: Ashcroft: Principle above self
01/17/01: Justice for Riady?
01/15/01: Ashcroft: A hill to die on
01/10/01: Returning to the supply side
01/08/01: Reasons for optimism
01/03/01: Bush's daunting challenges
12/28/00: Ashcroft: A triumph for the rule of law
12/26/00: A tinge of revenge?
12/20/00: GOP: Breaking the race barrier
12/18/00: Civility doesn't require surrender
12/13/00: Al Gore: Innocent victimizer
12/11/00: Judicial restraint and ordered liberty
12/06/00: The four years war
12/04/00: Debunking Gore myths
11/29/00: Defending the smaller principles
11/27/00: Albert O'Gore and the little people
11/22/00: Doing 'anything to win'
11/15/00: Enough is enough, Mr. Gore
11/13/00: Al Gore: Thy country or thyself?
11/08/00: Bill and Al: Your time is up
11/06/00:The impending Bush mandate
11/01/00: Can't stop thinkin' 'bout tomorrow
10/30/00: George: Give Gore the ball back
10/25/00: Mr. Gore: A few more questions
10/23/00: It's the big government, stupid
10/18/00: Gore's down, so will he panic?
10/16/00: We're fresh out of new Al Gores
10/11/00: Gore: Fuzzy math = dirty politics
10/10/00:Gore: Renaissance man or unbalanced?
10/04/00: Where have you been, Albert Jr.?
10/02/00: Clintonís fragmented presidency
09/27/00: Liberal media doth protest too much
09/25/00: AlGore: Turning dreams into nightmares
09/20/00: Something fishy's going on
09/18/00: It's the liberalism, stupid
09/13/00: An open letter to open-minded cynics
09/11/00: The virtues of going negative
09/06/00: On a mission for marriage
09/04/00: Al Gore's 'Trivial Pursuits'
08/30/00: Lieberman and the paradox of liberal 'tolerance'
08/28/00: A campaign divided against itself
08/23/00: Al Gore's trickle-down populism
08/21/00: Prosperity without a clue
08/16/00: AlGore can run but he can't hide
08/14/00: When hate speech is OK
08/09/00: Bush: The pundits' enigma
08/07/00: GOP convention: Live or Memorex?
08/02/00: The first attack dog
07/31/00: The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?
© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.