Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 5, 1999 /26 Teves, 5760

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Weekly Standard



Just one more year
of Clintonian politics -- AS I SCANNED the newspapers on the first Monday of the new year, I came across a story about President Clinton's plan to reintroduce the $322 billion tax bill he offered while vetoing the Republicans "risky" $792 billion tax cut last year. I thought to myself, "Please, not another year of political demagoguery." Just when I thought we might be getting a respite from the class-warfare I realized there would be no peace until this campaign warrior's term expires.

Many have speculated about Clinton's legacy, including Clinton himself. How will he ultimately be viewed from a historical perspective?

As much as Clinton craves greatness, he is enslaved by the often-conflicting desire for short-term gratification. In fact, one of the tragic aspects about this administration is that it has been whipsawed in a constant turmoil between its short-term and long-term interests. Yes, you heard me right -- I said its (the administration's) interests, not the nation's. I think it's rather obvious to most observers that Clinton, even more than most sinners, is primarily motivated by his selfish interests, from sensual gratification to the desire to be enshrined as an extraordinary president.

Beyond the physical peccadilloes, Clinton's main short-term interests involve his desire for approval. To satisfy this unquenchable desire, Clinton is in perpetual campaign mode. There is barely any transition between his campaigns for office and his governance. Once elected, his campaign machinery merely shifts its focus from getting him elected to winning support for his policies.

People say his policies are driven by the polls, but it's a bit more complex than that. In actuality, his propaganda machinery seeks to manipulate the will of the people, which, in effect, steers the polls in alignment with his policy objectives. In those rare cases where his propaganda machine fails to fool enough of the people he merely abandons his policy pursuit. To Clinton, ideology is very important, but always subordinate to his personal interests. Besides, he can always try his policy initiatives again, after enough time has passed and his formidable war room has had ample time to demonize opponents of the policy.

Clinton's quest for a real legacy has been consistently frustrated. There have simply been no lasting achievements. Despite the incredible prosperity during his watch, even he seems instinctively to realize that he had little to do with it. The arguably favorable result in Kosovo was marred by his Mr. Magoo-style handling of the conflict.

He is in tireless pursuit of that one miraculous policy triumph for which he can claim indivisible credit and which will historically outweigh his scandal-ridden presidency. If only that pesky 22nd Amendment weren't in his way, he wouldn't have to worry about achievements that would survive his presidency because he could just continue to get re-elected.

As his remaining time in office ticks away, his awareness of missed opportunities and failed dreams surely intensifies. The bottom line, though, is that he must know that his aspiration to make Mt. Rushmore is quixotic at best. Even extending his administration through Al Gore or Hillary will fail to grant him presidential immortality. In the end, this administration, like all others, will be judged on its own merits.

A full generation may pass before the gavel of historical justice finally falls on this administration and renders its verdict. In the meantime, we will have to deal with the short-term consequences of Clinton's destructive politics.

Though he has persistently harped on the need for bipartisanship, he has done more than anyone else to destroy collegiality and sow seeds of distrust between the parties and among the people. He has cut a wide swath of cynicism and distrust during the last seven years and will doubtlessly continue on that path throughout his term.

Though he has often talked about healing, it is a politico-medical fact that wounds won't heal if they are continually reopened. As I read about Clinton's tax initiative I was reminded that this nation would have to endure another year of his injurious behavior -- his scaremongering, his class and race warfare and his deceit -- before the healing period can begin.

On the bright side, though, a year is not that long.

JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?