Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 23, 2000 / 24 Tishrei, 5761

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


It's the big government, stupid


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- AL GORE has proven that he is completely out of touch with the American people, and undecided voters in particular. Bush has tapped into their pulse because he happens to be one of them: a real person.

Concerning Gore, I'm referring to his reaction to his own performance in the third presidential debate. In an interview with Fox News' Jim Angle he was giddy to the point of being intoxicated as he playfully goaded Angle into assessing his performance.

Even more telling than Gore's self-satisfied glow is the revelation that he is trying to make sure that the third debate is re-aired so that more people can watch it. I wonder just exactly what it is that Gore is anxious for more people to see.

Pollster Frank Luntz found that in terms of swaying undecided voters Bush won the debate hands down. Among members of his focus group in St. Louis, five Gore supporters switched to Bush, and only two of Bush's switched to Gore. Being in St. Louis that night, I talked briefly with Luntz as he was explaining his results to a small group of us in a hotel lobby. Above all, Luntz impressed me that he is convinced that his group is truly representative of undecided voters, due to his organization's thorough vetting process in selecting people who ultimately qualify for the group.

Happily for Bush supporters, Gore is apparently choosing to listen to the wisdom of the Washington Post editorial board, rather than swing voters. The Post pronounced Gore's third debate effort as "just right."

Bush supporters think that Gore's performance was just right, too -- "just right" to ensure Gore's defeat if he continues in that mode. His impudent invasion of Bush's space was "just right" to cause one female politician I was talking with to be utterly repulsed by him. His petulant insistence on making Dingle and Norwood household names was "just right" to convince all non-policy wonks (99.9 percent of the American people) that he is an irredeemable nerd rather than a champion of the people. That endless exchange would have only been better if Gore had been wearing a superhero cape and coke bottle glasses. Gore's boorish repetition of the 1 percent mantra was "just right" to ensure that those who weren't turned off by it the first ten times would be by the last five.

As out of touch as Gore is, however, I think he'll wake up when he sees that the polls continue to contradict his self-punditry. Then we'll truly see an acting-out of the desperation that he'll be experiencing. It's not going to be pretty.

Among the tactics he'll probably use, is to escalate greatly his efforts to scare the elderly (and others) about the security of their Social Security (and Medicare). Bush should be ready but not overreact to the ploy. So far, what Bush is doing is working, and he should stay the course.

Bush's heartfelt denunciation of big government is resonating infinitely more than Gore's demonization of big business and the wealthy. How fitting that a man mostly from the private sector is taking the career politician to school about the virtues of entrepreneurship and the vices of government largesse.

Bush should continue to expand this theme across the board, as it can be applied to nearly every issue on the table, including education, health care, the environment, the budget, taxes, Social Security, Medicare, prescription drugs and even foreign policy. Gore is manifestly for increased government spending and control in all cases, which means radically diminished personal liberties.

George Bush doesn't have to do much political strategizing because his policies are consistent with his deeply held principles. To him, this election is about the American people -- whether we will continue to live and prosper in freedom or continue to walk that "alluring" path toward paternalism and totalitarianism.

When Gore again tries to scare the people, he will probably find that he and Bill Clinton have cried wolf one too many times. The public has now seen George W. Bush, and they instinctively know that unlike his opponent and his narcissistic mentor, he will not place his personal political interests above their welfare.

Gore finished his closing remarks with the shamelessly Reagan-affected statement, "You ain't seen nothing yet." As I think he'll discover on Nov. 7, we've seen plenty, thank you.



JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

WND

Up

10/18/00: Gore's down, so will he panic?
10/16/00: We're fresh out of new Al Gores
10/11/00: Gore: Fuzzy math = dirty politics
10/10/00:Gore: Renaissance man or unbalanced?
10/04/00: Where have you been, Albert Jr.?
10/02/00: Clintonís fragmented presidency
09/27/00: Liberal media doth protest too much
09/25/00: AlGore: Turning dreams into nightmares
09/20/00: Something fishy's going on
09/18/00: It's the liberalism, stupid
09/13/00: An open letter to open-minded cynics
09/11/00: The virtues of going negative
09/06/00: On a mission for marriage
09/04/00: Al Gore's 'Trivial Pursuits'
08/30/00: Lieberman and the paradox of liberal 'tolerance'
08/28/00: A campaign divided against itself
08/23/00: Al Gore's trickle-down populism
08/21/00: Prosperity without a clue
08/16/00: AlGore can run but he can't hide
08/14/00: When hate speech is OK
08/09/00: Bush: The pundits' enigma
08/07/00: GOP convention: Live or Memorex?
08/02/00: The first attack dog
07/31/00: The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/29/00: Phantasma-Gore-ia
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?

© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.