Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 17, 2000 / 14 Tamuz, 5760

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

How dare you, George? -- CAN YOU IMAGINE the dramatic change that would occur in the landscape of presidential politics if Republicans could just persuade a small portion of the black population to break ranks with the Democratic Party? Al Gore can.

Democratic presidential candidates are completely dependent on landslide majorities from black voters. In 1992, President Bush garnered only 12 percent of the black vote and in 1996, Dole managed 14 percent. Today most polls show Gore getting the support of more than 80 percent of black voters.

That's why Gore is more than a bit nervous that Bush accepted the NAACP's invitation to speak at their annual convention. The last two Republican presidential candidates declined.

Hillary Clinton appeared uneasy about Bush's territorial encroachment, too. When addressing the convention, she cautioned those present to be wary of Bush's empty words. In fact Hillary and Al must have conspired about this because they mouthed nearly identical talking points. Hillary said, "Watch what they do, not what they say." Gore said, "his words are not matched by his deeds."

They are worried because Bush is making good on his promise to fight Al Gore for every last vote. He's honoring his pledge not to write off the black vote just because Republicans have had difficulty with it in the past.

Al and Hillary are also worried because Bush comes off as a person who really does care about the plight of blacks. It won't be easy for Democrats to paint the compassionate conservative as an uncaring racist. Bush, by the way, did provide some evidence to back up his words. "And I am especially proud of this fact: that African-American fourth graders in the state of Texas have better math skills than any other students -- in any state in the United States of America."

Bush's words have them worried as well. It is instructive to compare Bush's NAACP speech to Gore's. While Bush discussed a greater federal role in some policy areas than most Republicans have in the past, he stressed themes of opportunity instead of federal handouts.

Bush talked about advancing racial harmony and economic opportunity. He invoked a few of his now-familiar slogans, which smack of free enterprise rather than socialism. "The purpose of prosperity is to ensure the American dream touches every willing heart." The emphasis is on "willing." To Bush, the American dream obviously involves freedom, opportunity and achievement, not transfer payments and security.

Bush's other slogan is also more than lofty rhetoric. "I will confront another form of bias: the soft bigotry of low expectations." Whether or not Gore realizes it, his agenda of treating the federal government as a glorified candy store is all about the bigotry of low expectations. When he makes the outlandish promise that every child in America will have full health care within the next four years; when he virtually pledges to make affirmative action a permanent institution in America, he's telling blacks that he has low expectations of them.

Bush's message was more about empowering blacks than promising them endless federal initiatives in exchange for their votes. He advocated accountability and competition in education with vouchers and school choice while Gore vowed to protect government-subsidized incompetence in education.

For his part, Gore resorted to his familiar scare-mongering and race-baiting tactics. He said that Republicans wanted to block statistical census counting because they didn't want all blacks to be counted. Inexplicably, he implied that hate crime legislation would "stamp out the sparks of hatred." He railed about the Confederate flag. He said the "far right" wanted to stack the court with justices who would threaten civil rights and civil liberties. (I couldn't help but wonder whether he was thinking about the Fourth Amendment rights of Elian Gonzalez's Miami relatives or the Branch Davidians of Waco, Texas).

Maybe I'm naive, but I keep hoping this kind of pandering and patronizing will one day wear thin among substantial numbers of black voters. It's hard for me to imagine that some NAACP members didn't either bristle or snicker when Gore said, "I have made more trips to Africa than I've made to Asia."

Who knows? Bush just may be making some inroads into traditional Democratic territory. Can you really blame Al and Hillary for being a little scared?

JWR contributor David Limbaugh is an attorney practicing in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and a political analyst and commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.



07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/29/00: Phantasma-Gore-ia
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
01/03/00: McMedia?
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?