Jewish World Review Sept. 6, 2000 / 5 Elul, 5760
On a mission for marriage
HAS THE CAUSE of family values been diminished in this country? Matt
Daniels, executive director of the Alliance for Marriage, thinks so --
and is determined to do something about it.
Daniels, whose father left him and his mother to fend for themselves
in Spanish Harlem when Daniels was just 2 years old, is an unlikely
advocate for two-parent families. After all, he is living proof that
kids from single-parent families can excel in our society.
He graduated from Dartmouth College in 1985 Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum
laude, and obtained a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law
School in 1996. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate in American politics
at Brandeis University.
So, what is Daniels so exercised about? As a student of government
and law, he understands that America's system of ordered liberty is
dependent on an underlying infrastructure of moral values. Despite the
genius of our Constitution, our freedoms will eventually collapse if the
moral pillars undergirding them disintegrate.
This idea that the Constitution alone is not sufficient to sustain
our liberties is no insult to the framers. They clearly understood this
That's what John Adams meant when he said: "Our Constitution was made
only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the
government of any other." Similarly, Washington wrote, "Of all the
dispositions and habits that lead to political prosperity, religion and
morality are indispensable supports."
Daniels understands that these are more than lofty words. Family
values are at the root of America's greatness. Yet they are under
assault from powerful forces today.
Both major political parties acknowledge the fundamental importance
of morality and family values in our society. Democratic vice
presidential candidate Joseph Lieberman, who used the Adams and
Washington quotes in a recent speech, has made such issues a central
part of his campaign message.
Republicans have been promoting these themes for years, long before
Dan Quayle's "Murphy Brown" speech.
Daniels, however, is concerned that the parties have sometimes
allowed "family values" to become a surrogate for their partisan
agendas. Politicians have so overused "children" and "family" that their
meanings have been lost in a semantic jungle. To Daniels, "family
values" has a specific meaning whose importance transcends politics.
A new Wirthin poll confirms that a great majority of Americans are
convinced that marriage and families should be among our highest
political priorities, more important than a clean environment (say 77
percent); a greater priority than increasing job opportunities (64
percent). Indeed, 92 percent say we cannot move forward as a nation
without strengthening our families.
The Alliance for Marriage intends to put meaning back into the phrase
"family values," to communicate that marriage and two-parent families
are at its core. Two-parent families are not just important to their
children, they are crucial to a healthy society. AFM points out that "a
large and growing body of social science research indicates that the
union of a man and woman in marriage is the single most beneficial
social institution in the world."
Married men and women live longer, experience less depression,
alcoholism and substance abuse, and have higher income and savings
levels. Children of married parents experience less poverty, fewer
emotional and psychological problems, lower rates of criminal behavior
and substance abuse, and higher levels of educational achievement.
While too many politicians have been reluctant to boldly defend
marriage, AFM has formulated an ambitious, non-partisan agenda to
restore the sanctity of the institution.
"The goal here is not to blame single parents," Daniels says,
emphasizing the often heroic efforts single mothers and fathers make to
rear their children alone. "It's simply to get the word out about an
important social truth."
In furtherance of refurbishing marriage and restoring a culture of
married fatherhood in American society, AFM will work to reduce the tax
burden on married families with children, attain increased tax
incentives for adoption by married couples, require marital
reconciliation counseling as a precondition to divorce, eliminate all
welfare policies that penalize married welfare recipients, fund
public-education programs emphasizing the importance of marriage and
support community efforts encouraging fathers to commit to marriage.
It is refreshing that another powerful voice has emerged to challenge
the nostrums of political correctness. Godspeed to Matt Daniels and the
commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
09/04/00: Al Gore's 'Trivial Pursuits'
08/30/00: Lieberman and the paradox of liberal 'tolerance'
08/28/00: A campaign divided against itself
08/23/00: Al Gore's trickle-down populism
08/21/00: Prosperity without a clue
08/16/00: AlGore can run but he can't hide
08/14/00: When hate speech is OK
08/09/00: Bush: The pundits' enigma
08/07/00: GOP convention: Live or Memorex?
08/02/00: The first attack dog
07/31/00: The Cheney taint?
07/26/00: The anti-gun bogeyman
07/24/00: The raging culture war
07/19/00: Is Hillary 'Good for the Jews'?
07/17/00: How dare you, George?
07/12/00: Jacoby's raw deal
07/10/00: The perplexities of liberalism
07/05/00: Big Al and big oil
07/03/00: Partial-birth and total death
06/28/00: Some questions for you, Mr. Gore
06/26/00: Supreme Court assaults religious freedom
06/21/00: Waco: We are the jury
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?
© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.