Jewish World Review June 21, 2000 /18 Sivan, 5760
Waco: We are the jury
ON MONDAY, June 19, 2000, a civil trial began to determine the
government's culpability for the Waco massacre in 1993.
At least, that's how the media are portraying this wrongful death
lawsuit against the government brought by survivors of the Branch
Davidians who died in the 1993 raid on the Waco compound. But the truth
is that we don't need a trial to establish the government's culpability.
It has already been established through the investigations conducted
following the event.
In seeking to escape liability, the government will no doubt try to
portray the incident and the resulting 80 deaths as entirely the fault
of cult leader David Koresh. And without question Koresh is partly to
blame. But a significant degree of fault also lies with the government,
which could have averted this tragedy and spared the lives of these
mostly innocent people, including 19 children. Even a jury verdict in
favor of the government will not alter that fact.
The Clinton administration has employed the same PR strategy with
Waco as it has with other instances involving its malfeasance. It has
sought to deflect criticism of its own conduct by demonizing its
accusers. Law professor Jonathan Turley -- absolutely my favorite
liberal on the planet -- puts the lie to this Clinton propaganda effort.
"Waco horrified a great number of people in the mainstream. The Justice
Department, however, tends to portray the Waco incident as largely a
concern for fringe and extremist groups."
There have been some seemingly outrageous claims regarding the Waco
incident. But the problem is that with this administration you just
never know, because deceit is the taproot of so many of its activities.
One glaring example is that Janet Reno defiantly denied for six years
that the FBI used incendiary devices at the siege. Only Waco wackos
would conjure up such a fanciful idea. Right? Wrong. Last year Reno was
humiliated with belated FBI admissions that they had in fact used
pyrotechnic containers during the siege. So what else did they lie
about? As it turns out, plenty.
Within the remaining space I just want to relate a few of the 1996
findings of two congressional subcommittees investigating the affair.
These were not the rantings of paramilitary groups, but the conclusions
of congressional committees after conducting 10 days of hearings,
entertaining more than 100 witnesses and reviewing thousands of
Concerning the initial raid (Feb. 28, 1993):
The subcommittees also concluded that:
- While the ATF had probable cause to obtain the arrest and
search warrants, the affidavit filed in support of the warrants
contained numerous false statements.
- Koresh could have been arrested outside the compound (he often
went jogging off premises); but
- The ATF was predisposed to a military-style raid as much as two
months before their undercover operations began.
- The ATF knew that Koresh had been tipped off about the initial
raid and that he was likely to resist forcefully, but it deliberately
proceeded with the raid anyway, instead of delaying it in accordance
with its policy.
- ATF raid commanders lied about the fact that they knew before the
raid that Koresh had been tipped off and would likely be lying in wait
Who should we believe? The Clinton administration or the
- Instead of cooperating with the committees, the
administration engaged in damage control from the beginning. The
president himself characterized the hearings as an attack on law
- The ATF's investigation of the Branch Davidians was grossly
- Despite all of these findings and many more, the Justice and
Treasury Departments issued detailed written reports exonerating all
The subcommittees did not present a one-sided picture. In fact, they
concluded that "the ultimate responsibility for the deaths of the
Davidians and law enforcement agents lies with Koresh." But they also
said that the ATF's reckless decision to proceed with the raid "more
than any other factor, led to the deaths of the four ATF agents killed
on February 28." And they found that "although physical and sexual abuse
of children occurred, the final assault (on April 19) put the children
at the greatest risk."
That's the understatement of the last century. A government does not
protect children by engaging in activities that ultimately led to their
deaths. We can figure that much out ourselves, no matter what the jury
commentator. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
06/19/00: "Outrage" just doesn't quite cut it anymore!
06/14/00: Al Gore: Government's best friend
06/12/00: Say goodbye to medical privacy
06/07/00: Elian: Whose hands were tied?
06/05/00: Who, which, what is the real Al Gore?
06/01/00: Legacy-building idea for Clinton
05/30/00: Clinton: Above the law or not?
05/24/00: Not so fast, Hillary
05/22/00: Gore's risky, fear-mongering schemes
05/17/00: Can Bush risk pro-choice running mate?
05/15/00: Right to privacy, Clinton-style
05/10/00: Patrick Kennedy and his suit-happy fiddlers
05/08/00: Don't shoot Eddie Eagle
05/03/00: Congress caves to Clinton, again?
05/01/00: The resurrection of outrage
04/28/00: A picture of Bill Clinton's America
04/19/00: President Clinton: Teaching children responsibility
04/17/00: Elian, Marx and parental rights
04/12/00: Elian, freedom deserve a hearing
04/10/00:The fraying of America
04/05/00: Noonan: End Clintonism now
04/03/00: Bush: On going for the gold
03/27/00: Treaties, triggers, tobacco and tyrants
03/22/00: Media to Bush: Go left, young man
03/20/00: Stop the insanity
03/15/00: OK Al Gore: Let's go negative
03/13/00: Deifying of the center
03/08/00: The media, the establishment and the people
03/01/00: McCain's coalition-busting daggers in GOP's heart
02/28/00: Bush's silver lining in McMichigan
02/24/00: A conservative firewall, after all
02/22/00: Bush or four more of Clinton-Gore?
02/16/00: Substance trumps process
02/14/00: The campaign finance reform mirage
02/09/00: President McCain: End of the GOP as we know it?
02/07/00: From New Hampshire to South Carolina
02/02/00: SDI must fly
01/31/00: Veep gores Bradley
01/26/00: The issues gap
01/24/00: GOP: Exit, stage left
01/20/00: Nationalizing congressional elections
01/18/00: Do voters really prefer straight talk?
01/12/00: Media's McCain efforts may backfire
01/10/00: Conservative racism myth
01/05/00: Just one more year of Clintonian politics
12/27/99: Al Gore: Bullish on government
12/22/99: Bradley's full-court press
12/20/99: Bush: Rendering unto Caesar
12/15/99: Beltway media bias
12/13/99: White House ambulance chasing
12/08/99: Clinton's labor pains
12/06/99:The lust for power
12/01/99: In defense of liberty
11/29/99: Are Republicans obsolete?
11/24/99: Say you're sorry, Mr. President
11/22/99: Architects of victory
11/17/99: Trump's tax on freedom
11/15/99: GOP caves again
11/10/99: Triangulation and 'The Third Way'
11/08/99: Sticks and stones
11/03/99: Keyes vs. media lapdogs
11/01/99: Signs of the times
10/27/99: The false charge of isolationism
10/25/99: A matter of freedom
10/20/99: Clinton's mini-meltdown
10/18/99: Senate GOP shows statesmanship
10/13/99: Senate must reject nuclear treaty
10/11/99: Bush bites feeding hand
10/06/99: Jesse accidentally opens door for Pat
10/04/99: Clinton and his media enablers
09/29/99: Reagan: Big-tent conservatism
09/27/99: The Clinton/Gore taint?
09/22/99: Have gun (tragedy), will travel
09/20/99: Hillary's blunders and bloopers
09/15/99: GOP must remain conservative
09/13/99:Time for Bush to take charge, please
09/10/99: Bush's education plan: Dubya confounds again
09/07/99: Pat, savior or spoiler?
09/02/99: Character doesn't matter?
08/30/99: Should we judge?
08/25/99: Dubyah's drug question: Not a hill to die on
08/23/99: Should Dubyah start buying soap ... for all that mud?
08/16/99: 'W' stands for 'winner'
08/11/99: The truth about tax cuts
08/09/99: Hillary: Threading the needle
08/04/99: What would you do?
08/02/99: No appeasement for China
07/30/99: Hate Crimes Bill: Cynical Symbolism
07/26/99: Itís the 'moderates', stupid
07/21/99: JFK Jr. and Diana: the pain of privilege
07/19/99: Smith, Bush and the GOP
07/14/99: GOP must be a party of ideas
07/12/99: Gore's gender gap
07/08/99: Clintonís faustian bargain: our justice
07/06/99: The key to Bush's $36 million
06/30/99: Gore: a soda in every fountain
06/28/99: 'Sacred wall' or religious barrier?
06/23/99: GOP must lead in foreign policy
06/21/99: Crumbs of compassion
06/16/99: Compassionate conservatism: face-lift or body transplant?
06/10/99: Victory in Kosovo? Now What?
© 2000, CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.