Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Dec. 19, 2002 / 14 Teves, 5763

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Put-up or shut-up time

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Iraq's denial that it has any weapons of mass destruction (WMD) brings to mind the old adage, "Who are you going to believe? Me, or your own eyes?" The eyes of the western world are their intelligence services, and, as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld put it, "Any country on the face of the Earth, with an active intelligence program, knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction."

Iraq's declaration is manifestly false and surely amounts to a "material breach" of the U.N. Security Council resolution calling for a "full, final, and complete" declaration of Iraq's weapons programs. Baghdad's declaration is neither full, final, nor complete. After appropriate consultation with the U.N., it frees President Bush, as he put it, "to lead a coalition that will disarm Saddam Hussein." Or, if need be, to act alone.

The U.N. inspections that were halted in 1998 left no doubt as to Saddam's intentions. Back then, he had 360 tons of chemical warfare agents, 3,000 tons of precursor chemicals, 25,000 liters of anthrax, and over 30,000 special munitions for the delivery of chemical and biological agents. Iraq failed to account for them then. Who would now accept Iraq's assertion that, alas, it no longer has the records to prove it destroyed these weapons?

Still, Washington would do well to hammer home the point by releasing some of its more recent intelligence. The American people, who have been stalwart in support of the president, can be trusted to recognize that there will always be room for doubt because intelligence assessments are by nature judgment calls. And Saddam is an expert at sowing doubt. He will play on dissent from countries like France and Russia and from others within the Arab and Muslim world.

Hide and seek. We must be clear. It is no longer up to the U.N. inspectors. They are there not to inspect but only to verify that Iraq has made a complete disclosure and destroyed its WMD arsenal. They were not sent as detectives to ferret out the concealed weapons and production facilities. That would be a mission impossible. A group of 100 or so inspectors, traveling in high-profile U.N. caravans in a country the size of California, cannot conceivably declare Iraq clean when everything Saddam needs for his WMD programs can be hidden in trucks, closets, and bathrooms.

The British know this. In a chilling report released just recently, they described Iraq's large, effective system for concealing proscribed materials, including dual-use facilities and hiding spots that are located close to roads and telecommunications so that illicit items can be moved on short notice. Indeed, the British reported that Iraq can get WMD ready for use within 45 minutes of Saddam's orders.

President Bush has been consistent in asserting that further deceptions by Saddam will not be tolerated. If the administration failed to act now, it would not only let Saddam off the hook but allow him to accumulate funds from oil sales to buy or build a still-greater WMD arsenal. And, it would ruin American credibility in the Muslim world, among the rejectionist regimes like Iran and Syria and among other sponsors of terrorism. It would make a mockery of the U.S. national-security documents alerting the country to the dangers of what Bush called the "crossroads of radicalism and technology," in which small groups could attain catastrophic power to strike great nations. And it would confirm al Qaeda's perception of America, that when "you hit them . . . they will run." Beirut, Somalia, the attacks on our embassies in East Africa-all brought angry but empty words and, at most, a few misdirected missiles. As Prof. Bernard Lewis, the great authority on Islam, pointed out, the conclusion that the terrorists drew from this is that the United States has become frightened and incapable of responding, and the terrorist attack of 9/11 was, in part, the result of this perception.

America must be resolute. Should a member of the Security Council announce his intention to oppose action against Iraq-and France and Russia may be tempted because of their eagerness to pursue economic self-interests with Saddam-we must stand firm. This, more than anything, will show the terrorists that their earlier misjudgment of our resolve was dangerously wrong. Which is the real reason we must force the issue with Iraq. Vaclav Havel, the revered Czech playwright-president, put it clearly. "Evil," he said, "should be combated in its germinal stages, rather than in its developed form." Action, in other words. Not vacillation and dithering.

Forty years ago, President Kennedy observed that "we no longer live in a world where only the actual firing of weapons represents a sufficient challenge to a nation's security to constitute maximum peril." JFK acted. Today, the truth he enunciated is magnified a thousandfold, and it is to the great credit of President Bush that he recognizes it and is responding with the same courage and fortitude.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up


12/09/02: Sheep, wolves, and reality
11/21/02: Curing the uncommon cold
11/12/02: Everybody has the right to be wrong but the Dems have been abusing the privilege
11/05/02: Force vs. fanaticism
10/30/02: Land of the sinking sun
10/22/02: No more cat and mouse
10/15/02: And pigs will fly
10/07/02: A shameful contagion
09/26/02: Calling a madman's number
09/23/02: Our rainbow underclass
09/13/02: Why America must act
09/04/02: After bubbles, a double dip?
08/20/02: No time for equivocation
08/06/02: No time for politics
07/30/02: Getting off the dime
07/17/02: What scandal cannot dim
06/18/02: Time to crack down: Where is the outrage?
06/05/02: The next new thing
04/30/02: Roller-coaster nation
04/25/02: A critical tipping point
04/15/02: Israel's endgame will impact the free world
03/21/02: In the face of pure evil
03/14/02: A man on a mission
03/07/02: Land of the Sinking Sun
02/12/02: Speaking truth about energy
01/15/02: Putting our house in order
01/12/02: Talking points for 2002
12/24/01: The shape of things to come
12/11/01: Finally, a clarity of vision
12/04/01: Apocalypse now
11/26/01: The Big Apple's core
11/06/01: What it will take to win
10/22/01: Getting the mayor's message
10/08/01: A remedy for repair
10/01/01: A question of priorities
09/26/01: Our mission, our moment
09/11/01: Running the asylum
08/29/01: Hail, brave consumer
06/14/01: Blackouts --- or blackmail?
06/01/01: A time to reap --- and sow
05/25/01: A question of confidence
05/18/01: A question of confidence
05/04/01: Making the grade
04/26/01: The caribou conundrum
04/19/01: Chinese boomerang
03/27/01: The man of the moment
03/20/01: The Fed must be bold
03/15/01: Japan on the brink
03/01/01: Rethinking the next war
02/09/01: The education paradox
01/08/01: How the bottom fell out
01/03/01: Quipping in the new year
12/20/00: A time for healing
11/13/00: The need for legitimacy
10/30/00: Arafat's bloody cynicism
10/18/00: Arafat torches peace
10/03/00: A great step backward
09/08/00: The Perfect Storm
08/29/00: Don't blow the surplus
08/15/00: Voting for grown-ups
08/01/00: Arafat's lack of nerve
07/17/00: Can there be a new peace between old enemies? Or will new enemies regress to an old state of war?
07/11/00: A time to celebrate
06/19/00: A bit of straight talk
06/08/00: Using hate against Israel
05/26/00: Is the Federal Reserve trigger-happy?
04/18/00: Tensions on the 'Net
04/13/00: A paranoid power
03/10/00: Fuel prices in the red zone
02/25/00: Web wake-up call
02/18/00: Back to the future
01/21/00: Whistling while we work
01/11/00: Loose lips, fast quips
12/23/99: The times of our lives
12/14/99: Hey, big spender
11/18/99: Fountain of Youth
11/04/99: An impossible partner
10/14/99: A nation divided
10/05/99: India at center stage
09/21/99: Along with good cops, we need a better probation system
09/08/99: Though plundered and confused, Russia can solve its problems
08/31/99: The military should spend more on forces and less on facilities
08/05/99: Squandering the surplus
07/06/99: More than ever, America's unique promise is a reality
06/24/99: The time has come to hit the brakes on affirmative action
06/15/99: America should take pride in honoring its responsibilities
06/02/99: The Middle Kingdom shows its antagonistic side
05/11/99: Technology's transforming power is giving a lift to everything
05/04/99: The big game gets bigger
04/30/99: On Kosovo, Russia talked loudly and carried a small stick
04/21/99: No time to go wobbly
04/13/99: The Evil of two lessers

© 2001, Mortimer Zuckerman