Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 12, 2002 / 7 Kislev, 5763

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Everybody has the right to be wrong but the Dems have been abusing the privilege

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | The Republican triumph last week challenges both political parties. The Democrats must look backward and deal with problems of failure; the Republicans can look forward and deal with problems of success. The Democrats need a message and a messenger. They tried to run on the weakness in the economy without a clear-cut plan to improve it. The economic facts restricted Democratic opportunities. On the income side, it is a jobless recovery, but the unemployment rate remains at a relatively low 5.7 percent and even less, 5.2 percent, for heads of household. Meanwhile, real wages have increased by a solid 2 percent.

On the wealth side, the stock market has made millions poorer-but the effect of wealth contraction was mitigated, since the top 10 percent own about 80 percent of stocks. More important, since 68 percent of families own their own homes, in a market of rising values and declining mortgage rates, this produced stunning opportunities for refinancing gains, with home equity of the average American family at least three times its financial assets. The economy, in other words, was hardly a burning political issue.

On what clearly was a key issue, the war on terrorism, the Democrats came off as "national security lite." They conveyed the perception that they were too interested in protecting special-interest constituencies-the civil service unions in their fight over the new homeland security department; the tort lawyers on the issue of terrorism insurance; and the environmental lobby on the issue of energy independence. Everybody has the right to be wrong. The Democrats have been abusing the privilege.

Fairness. Republicans now face a different set of problems. In George W. Bush, they have a gifted political messenger, but they cannot rely on the political momentum gained in last week's balloting to carry them through the presidential year of 2004. They will hazard the odds of a second term for Bush if they appear to support programs that excessively favor the wealthy and the business community, especially with investors bemoaning shrunken portfolios and so many corporate bosses exposed as hucksters. This is not, in short, a moment when Americans will equate good economic policy with what is good for business.

All this might be different, of course, if Americans thought they had a fair shot at success and that the winners in the American economy played by the rules instead of doing whatever they could get away with. Pay for performance is acceptable. But all the stories of executives who failed and were still paid millions of dollars on their way out the door are outrageous. Right now, 23 major companies are being investigated. Their CEOs collected about $1.4 billion in compensation between 1999 and 2001, only to see the market value of their companies plunge by about $500 billion, while over 160,000 people were laid off. As President Bush said, "Responsible leaders do not collect huge bonus packages when the value of their companies dramatically declines . . . ." nor "take home tens of millions of dollars in compensation as their companies prepare to file for bankruptcy." Who would have thought that business leaders who had already made so much money would ever have to do anything immoral in their entire business life? No wonder the American sense of fairness was aroused.

Traditionally, Americans don't resent wealth because they believe ours is an opportunity society and that anyone who works hard can make it here. Indeed, America has extended to millions of ordinary people the upwardly mobile avenues of economic advancement and personal fulfillment previously available only to the elite. But lurking in the background is the fact that average annual salaries in America, adjusted for inflation, have grown only about 10 percent from 1970 to 1999, while after-tax income for the top 1 percent rose by 157 percent. The bulk of all income gains were concentrated in the top 20 percent. Public cynicism over growing income inequality is an issue that is smoldering; if not watched carefully, it could burn Republicans-badly.

Democrats will make much of the fact that the two major tax cuts of the past 25 years, both under President Reagan and the current President Bush, were heavily tilted toward the well off, while the only major tax hike during that time-the increase in payroll taxes-was tilted the other way.

So ideas emanating from the Republican leadership like eliminating double taxation of dividends or reducing the capital-gains tax must, if proposed, be balanced by programs to extend unemployment insurance, provide medical care for the unemployed, and support states in fiscal crisis-all to create a perception of fairness.

Properly handled, though, the Republicans have the opportunity to take control of the great middle of American political life. Who would have thought George W. Bush would have been able to pull that off?

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up


11/05/02: Force vs. fanaticism
10/30/02: Land of the sinking sun
10/22/02: No more cat and mouse
10/15/02: And pigs will fly
10/07/02: A shameful contagion
09/26/02: Calling a madman's number
09/23/02: Our rainbow underclass
09/13/02: Why America must act
09/04/02: After bubbles, a double dip?
08/20/02: No time for equivocation
08/06/02: No time for politics
07/30/02: Getting off the dime
07/17/02: What scandal cannot dim
06/18/02: Time to crack down: Where is the outrage?
06/05/02: The next new thing
04/30/02: Roller-coaster nation
04/25/02: A critical tipping point
04/15/02: Israel's endgame will impact the free world
03/21/02: In the face of pure evil
03/14/02: A man on a mission
03/07/02: Land of the Sinking Sun
02/12/02: Speaking truth about energy
01/15/02: Putting our house in order
01/12/02: Talking points for 2002
12/24/01: The shape of things to come
12/11/01: Finally, a clarity of vision
12/04/01: Apocalypse now
11/26/01: The Big Apple's core
11/06/01: What it will take to win
10/22/01: Getting the mayor's message
10/08/01: A remedy for repair
10/01/01: A question of priorities
09/26/01: Our mission, our moment
09/11/01: Running the asylum
08/29/01: Hail, brave consumer
06/14/01: Blackouts --- or blackmail?
06/01/01: A time to reap --- and sow
05/25/01: A question of confidence
05/18/01: A question of confidence
05/04/01: Making the grade
04/26/01: The caribou conundrum
04/19/01: Chinese boomerang
03/27/01: The man of the moment
03/20/01: The Fed must be bold
03/15/01: Japan on the brink
03/01/01: Rethinking the next war
02/09/01: The education paradox
01/08/01: How the bottom fell out
01/03/01: Quipping in the new year
12/20/00: A time for healing
11/13/00: The need for legitimacy
10/30/00: Arafat's bloody cynicism
10/18/00: Arafat torches peace
10/03/00: A great step backward
09/08/00: The Perfect Storm
08/29/00: Don't blow the surplus
08/15/00: Voting for grown-ups
08/01/00: Arafat's lack of nerve
07/17/00: Can there be a new peace between old enemies? Or will new enemies regress to an old state of war?
07/11/00: A time to celebrate
06/19/00: A bit of straight talk
06/08/00: Using hate against Israel
05/26/00: Is the Federal Reserve trigger-happy?
04/18/00: Tensions on the 'Net
04/13/00: A paranoid power
03/10/00: Fuel prices in the red zone
02/25/00: Web wake-up call
02/18/00: Back to the future
01/21/00: Whistling while we work
01/11/00: Loose lips, fast quips
12/23/99: The times of our lives
12/14/99: Hey, big spender
11/18/99: Fountain of Youth
11/04/99: An impossible partner
10/14/99: A nation divided
10/05/99: India at center stage
09/21/99: Along with good cops, we need a better probation system
09/08/99: Though plundered and confused, Russia can solve its problems
08/31/99: The military should spend more on forces and less on facilities
08/05/99: Squandering the surplus
07/06/99: More than ever, America's unique promise is a reality
06/24/99: The time has come to hit the brakes on affirmative action
06/15/99: America should take pride in honoring its responsibilities
06/02/99: The Middle Kingdom shows its antagonistic side
05/11/99: Technology's transforming power is giving a lift to everything
05/04/99: The big game gets bigger
04/30/99: On Kosovo, Russia talked loudly and carried a small stick
04/21/99: No time to go wobbly
04/13/99: The Evil of two lessers

© 2001, Mortimer Zuckerman