Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 23, 2003 / 23 Tamuz, 5763

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Making odds on a recovery

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Here's the $64 billion question. (That's roughly the amount of money that will be rebated or distributed this summer under the new tax law.) Are we pulling out of a slow-growth period that feels like a recession, or are we sinking deeper? The smart guys and gals who write about the economy are far more optimistic than the smart guys and gals who write the checks. The former will tell you the glass is half full, the latter that the glass is half empty. In both cases, though, the top half of the glass is still dry as a bone.

The optimists point to the fiscal stimuli of huge budget deficits, record-low interest rates, and a weak dollar--three kicks they believe will boost consumer spending and production and create jobs. One marker of public sentiment lending credence to the optimists: the stock market. It's up this year by about $1.4 trillion, with the S&P average trading at a 32-times price-earnings ratio. We're talking bulls here, a herd of 'em. Another sunny sign: the housing market. It's booming, fueled by the lowest interest rates in 50 years.

Pessimists, of course, point to the egg accumulated on the faces of the optimists over the last several years for their unrealized predictions of growth. The average of nearly 1.5 percent for the last couple of years is well below the economy's capacity for growth, despite highly stimulative fiscal and monetary policies. The pessimists find confirmation in the loss of so many private-sector jobs, especially in manufacturing. Employment has now declined for the longest period since the Great Depression.

Donate to JWR

Guessing game. The pessimists believe this is a business cycle unlike any other since the end of World War II. In the bubble economy of the late 1990s, investors and businesses paid too much while families spent and borrowed freely; the government, meanwhile, assumed that fat surpluses were guaranteed forever. Now that the bubble has burst, we see there is too much debt--in the private sector especially--compounded by operating and capital account deficits of about $100 billion a year at the state and local government level. Add to that a huge foreign trade deficit that requires us to import some $500 billion of capital just to finance our domestic savings shortfall, and you have strong head winds that will hold back major growth. There is no pent-up demand to pull up the economy from the sectors most sensitive to interest rates, like housing and autos, because we have already had those spurts.

Who's right? Continued cost cutting by companies dubious that a recovery is just around the corner suggests the pessimists are. More than 3.8 million people now draw unemployment benefits, the highest in 20 years. The number looking for jobs has passed 9 million for the first time in 10 years. The unemployment rate has climbed to a nine-year high of 6.4 percent. The economy has lost over 300,000 jobs this year, and unemployment claims are still up around 425,000 a week. Since productivity gains are clearly exceeding the rate of growth, companies can go on cutting payroll while still meeting demand. If this continues, the rate of growth in disposable income will slow, consumption weaknesses will accelerate, and investment will be discouraged even more.

So the toughest question for the optimists is, Why should the economy come roaring back? Not much faith can be placed in the fiscal stimulus proposed and passed by the Bush administration since it is directed much more to stimulating investment spending and benefiting the wealthy. Given the excess capacity we clearly still have and given that the tax benefits will not incite adequate consumer demand, we may well be in for another unpleasant surprise--a slow economy throughout the rest of this year, much like what we have seen over the past two years.

But wait. Surprises are what economics is all about. After all, almost nobody anticipated the investment boom of the 1990s, just as most everyone was blindsided by the slowdown that has now extended into its third year. Today, most policymakers are dumbfounded by the failure of their stimuli to reignite the economy. This may well reflect the lack of understanding of the unique nature of the economic slowdown we have endured.

There is only one player here that has performed brilliantly, and that's the Federal Reserve. Led by Alan Greenspan, the board of governors began cutting interest rates aggressively in 2001, long before it was clear that we were in a recession. The Fed's willingness to maintain low interest rates and cut them still further comforts the business community, knowing that Greenspan & Co. remain vigilant for signs of further slowdown and the risk of deflation. Greenspan knows this is no time to risk the possibility of this economy getting worse.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up


07/15/03: A Kremlin conversation
06/10/03: Welcome to Sue City, U.S.A.
05/05/03: America's next critical test
04/22/03: The challenge of success
04/15/03: Shape up or step aside
04/08/03: The latest in reality TV is
04/02/03: Chirac and Saddam's thugs are two of a kind
03/26/03: War by new rules
03/05/03: The high price of waiting
02/14/03: Needed: fast fiscal action
02/03/03: Clear and compelling proof
01/24/03: Midnight for Baghdad
01/14/03: They should have said...
12/24/02: Who finances the fanatics?
12/19/02: Put-up or shut-up time
12/09/02: Sheep, wolves, and reality
11/21/02: Curing the uncommon cold
11/12/02: Everybody has the right to be wrong but the Dems have been abusing the privilege
11/05/02: Force vs. fanaticism
10/30/02: Land of the sinking sun
10/22/02: No more cat and mouse
10/15/02: And pigs will fly
10/07/02: A shameful contagion
09/26/02: Calling a madman's number
09/23/02: Our rainbow underclass
09/13/02: Why America must act
09/04/02: After bubbles, a double dip?
08/20/02: No time for equivocation
08/06/02: No time for politics
07/30/02: Getting off the dime
07/17/02: What scandal cannot dim
06/18/02: Time to crack down: Where is the outrage?
06/05/02: The next new thing
04/30/02: Roller-coaster nation
04/25/02: A critical tipping point
04/15/02: Israel's endgame will impact the free world
03/21/02: In the face of pure evil
03/14/02: A man on a mission
03/07/02: Land of the Sinking Sun
02/12/02: Speaking truth about energy
01/15/02: Putting our house in order
01/12/02: Talking points for 2002
12/24/01: The shape of things to come
12/11/01: Finally, a clarity of vision
12/04/01: Apocalypse now
11/26/01: The Big Apple's core
11/06/01: What it will take to win
10/22/01: Getting the mayor's message
10/08/01: A remedy for repair
10/01/01: A question of priorities
09/26/01: Our mission, our moment
09/11/01: Running the asylum
08/29/01: Hail, brave consumer
06/14/01: Blackouts --- or blackmail?
06/01/01: A time to reap --- and sow
05/25/01: A question of confidence
05/18/01: A question of confidence
05/04/01: Making the grade
04/26/01: The caribou conundrum
04/19/01: Chinese boomerang
03/27/01: The man of the moment
03/20/01: The Fed must be bold
03/15/01: Japan on the brink
03/01/01: Rethinking the next war
02/09/01: The education paradox
01/08/01: How the bottom fell out
01/03/01: Quipping in the new year
12/20/00: A time for healing
11/13/00: The need for legitimacy
10/30/00: Arafat's bloody cynicism
10/18/00: Arafat torches peace
10/03/00: A great step backward
09/08/00: The Perfect Storm
08/29/00: Don't blow the surplus
08/15/00: Voting for grown-ups
08/01/00: Arafat's lack of nerve
07/17/00: Can there be a new peace between old enemies? Or will new enemies regress to an old state of war?
07/11/00: A time to celebrate
06/19/00: A bit of straight talk
06/08/00: Using hate against Israel
05/26/00: Is the Federal Reserve trigger-happy?
04/18/00: Tensions on the 'Net
04/13/00: A paranoid power
03/10/00: Fuel prices in the red zone
02/25/00: Web wake-up call
02/18/00: Back to the future
01/21/00: Whistling while we work
01/11/00: Loose lips, fast quips
12/23/99: The times of our lives
12/14/99: Hey, big spender
11/18/99: Fountain of Youth
11/04/99: An impossible partner
10/14/99: A nation divided
10/05/99: India at center stage
09/21/99: Along with good cops, we need a better probation system
09/08/99: Though plundered and confused, Russia can solve its problems
08/31/99: The military should spend more on forces and less on facilities
08/05/99: Squandering the surplus
07/06/99: More than ever, America's unique promise is a reality
06/24/99: The time has come to hit the brakes on affirmative action
06/15/99: America should take pride in honoring its responsibilities
06/02/99: The Middle Kingdom shows its antagonistic side
05/11/99: Technology's transforming power is giving a lift to everything
05/04/99: The big game gets bigger
04/30/99: On Kosovo, Russia talked loudly and carried a small stick
04/21/99: No time to go wobbly
04/13/99: The Evil of two lessers

© 2001, Mortimer Zuckerman