Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 3, 2002 / 1 Adar I, 5763

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Clear and compelling proof | President Bush did what he had to do-and then some. His State of the Union address was a bravura performance, delivered with a degree of personal comfort and authority that makes nonsense of the critics' cartoon images of a born-again cowboy, riding into the big, bad world with guns blazing. His certainty that Iraq must be confronted now is underpinned by intelligence information that the government can share with us only to the degree it does not compromise sources. Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden, former chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, has made the point: "The administration has evidence now that can change people's minds."

Knowing how much to release, however, is a tough call. We have learned only recently, for instance, that there have been over 100 terrorist attacks aimed at the United States since 9/11. The targets have been American embassies on three continents, a military base in Europe, U.S. ships passing through the Straits of Hormuz and of Gibraltar, and our airports and aviation industries. All, blessedly, were thwarted. Secretary of State Colin Powell now wrestles with the question of how far to document the Iraqi connection to al Qaeda. In war-and that is what we face-a certain amount of trust must be reposed in government. But it is not just a question of persuading the American people; it is also world opinion, our allies, and those countries whose cooperation would help. Here we must contend not only with reality but emotion. As the sole superpower, America inevitably incurs resentment. "Sharing a bathtub with an elephant," as one wag put it, "is an uncomfortable proposition, even when the elephant tries to be friendly."

America on tap. It is ironic that the same America that has brought peace and liberty to so many millions around the world is seen by some now as a greater threat than Saddam Hussein. We saved Western Europe during the Cold War and dealt with the crises in the Balkans and Kosovo in the 1990s. Today, we are expected to protect Taiwan from China, to mediate between India and Pakistan, to resolve the crisis with North Korea, and even to settle a dispute between Morocco and Spain about a small island in the Mediterranean, home to several dozen goats. Europeans want us to be on tap but not on top.

A good part of the European moaning is really a psychological crutch to draw attention away from weaknesses at home-what the French writer Jean-François Revel called "weapons of mass distraction." Europeans cannot muster the political will to develop their own military, so they recoil from any use of force. We cannot be constrained by these apologies for impotence when we face dangers that metastasize almost daily. Iraq has failed to disarm as required by the United Nations resolutions. Hans Blix, the chief U.N. weapons inspector, is a notably cautious man. Consider his remarks last week to the U.N. Security Council on Saddam Hussein's performance under the U.N. inspections regime: "Iraq appears not to have come to genuine acceptance-not even today-of the disarmament which was demanded of it."

Translation: Iraq is in "material breach" of the U.N. resolution requiring "a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration" of weapons programs. Iraq has, quite simply, failed to account for the tons of chemical precursors and thousands of liters of biological warfare agents, chemical munitions, and other material the U.N. declared were missing when it first cataloged in 1991 Saddam's arsenal of horrors. The Iraqis say they destroyed these stocks, but when asked for proof, the best they could come up with is that a mob broke into the building where the records were stored, rifled the file cabinets, and set documents on fire. This is rich. The dog ate Saddam's homework.

Waiting much longer, then, is a fool's game. It would only strengthen Saddam's hand and weaken ours. We simply cannot stand by and run the risk of letting these weapons fall into the hands of terrorists or the rogue states ready to supply them. We live in an era when terrorists wreak death and disaster on civilian populations with no word of warning. "The United States cannot remain idle while dangers gather," President Bush's National Security Strategy document says. Most Americans agree. The militant Islamic fundamentalists so dedicated to killing us must be confronted and defeated.

If America's partners in the West are in for a dime and not for a dollar, so be it. This does not mean Washington will act as the Lone Ranger. We are, as the president said, a peaceful people. We want to work with our friends, and it behooves them to work with us. They, too, after all, are vulnerable. But they must understand the depth of the wound inflicted on us on 9/11 and respect our utter determination to defend our freedom and our civilization. The president's candor and courage leave not a shadow of doubt as to where we have planted our banner.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


01/24/03: Midnight for Baghdad
01/14/03: They should have said...
12/24/02: Who finances the fanatics?
12/19/02: Put-up or shut-up time
12/09/02: Sheep, wolves, and reality
11/21/02: Curing the uncommon cold
11/12/02: Everybody has the right to be wrong … but the Dems have been abusing the privilege
11/05/02: Force vs. fanaticism
10/30/02: Land of the sinking sun
10/22/02: No more cat and mouse
10/15/02: And pigs will fly
10/07/02: A shameful contagion
09/26/02: Calling a madman's number
09/23/02: Our rainbow underclass
09/13/02: Why America must act
09/04/02: After bubbles, a double dip?
08/20/02: No time for equivocation
08/06/02: No time for politics
07/30/02: Getting off the dime
07/17/02: What scandal cannot dim
06/18/02: Time to crack down: Where is the outrage?
06/05/02: The next new thing
04/30/02: Roller-coaster nation
04/25/02: A critical tipping point
04/15/02: Israel's endgame will impact the free world
03/21/02: In the face of pure evil
03/14/02: A man on a mission
03/07/02: Land of the Sinking Sun
02/12/02: Speaking truth about energy
01/15/02: Putting our house in order
01/12/02: Talking points for 2002
12/24/01: The shape of things to come
12/11/01: Finally, a clarity of vision
12/04/01: Apocalypse now
11/26/01: The Big Apple's core
11/06/01: What it will take to win
10/22/01: Getting the mayor's message
10/08/01: A remedy for repair
10/01/01: A question of priorities
09/26/01: Our mission, our moment
09/11/01: Running the asylum
08/29/01: Hail, brave consumer
06/14/01: Blackouts --- or blackmail?
06/01/01: A time to reap --- and sow
05/25/01: A question of confidence
05/18/01: A question of confidence
05/04/01: Making the grade
04/26/01: The caribou conundrum
04/19/01: Chinese boomerang
03/27/01: The man of the moment
03/20/01: The Fed must be bold
03/15/01: Japan on the brink
03/01/01: Rethinking the next war
02/09/01: The education paradox
01/08/01: How the bottom fell out
01/03/01: Quipping in the new year
12/20/00: A time for healing
11/13/00: The need for legitimacy
10/30/00: Arafat's bloody cynicism
10/18/00: Arafat torches peace
10/03/00: A great step backward
09/08/00: The Perfect Storm
08/29/00: Don't blow the surplus
08/15/00: Voting for grown-ups
08/01/00: Arafat's lack of nerve
07/17/00: Can there be a new peace between old enemies? Or will new enemies regress to an old state of war?
07/11/00: A time to celebrate
06/19/00: A bit of straight talk
06/08/00: Using hate against Israel
05/26/00: Is the Federal Reserve trigger-happy?
04/18/00: Tensions on the 'Net
04/13/00: A paranoid power
03/10/00: Fuel prices in the red zone
02/25/00: Web wake-up call
02/18/00: Back to the future
01/21/00: Whistling while we work
01/11/00: Loose lips, fast quips
12/23/99: The times of our lives
12/14/99: Hey, big spender
11/18/99: Fountain of Youth
11/04/99: An impossible partner
10/14/99: A nation divided
10/05/99: India at center stage
09/21/99: Along with good cops, we need a better probation system
09/08/99: Though plundered and confused, Russia can solve its problems
08/31/99: The military should spend more on forces and less on facilities
08/05/99: Squandering the surplus
07/06/99: More than ever, America's unique promise is a reality
06/24/99: The time has come to hit the brakes on affirmative action
06/15/99: America should take pride in honoring its responsibilities
06/02/99: The Middle Kingdom shows its antagonistic side
05/11/99: Technology's transforming power is giving a lift to everything
05/04/99: The big game gets bigger
04/30/99: On Kosovo, Russia talked loudly and carried a small stick
04/21/99: No time to go wobbly
04/13/99: The Evil of two lessers

© 2001, Mortimer Zuckerman