Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 24, 2002 / 21 Shevat, 5763

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Midnight for Baghdad

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | The shadow of January 27 is already upon us. It is menacing, and it cannot be dodged. Hans Blix, the chief U.N. weapons inspector, will that day report to the Security Council on the initial findings of his 130 inspectors in Iraq, but already he has concluded that Saddam Hussein has clearly violated a U.N. arms ban. Iraq has, says Blix, imported illegal material that could be used to build nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons, even in 2000 and 2001. Blix says further inspection is required to determine if these materials have indeed been acquired for weapons of mass destruction-a wriggle hole that other countries may well argue should delay action against Saddam.

Here is a real test for the resolution and credibility of the Europeans. Blix, en route to Baghdad, has briefed Britain's prime minister, Tony Blair, and the French president, Jacques Chirac. There is not much doubt about Blair. He has been a staunch ally, and he has also experienced close-up the vileness of the terrorists. The British have found a gang of North African terrorists making the deadly poison ricin, and last week a possible accomplice stabbed a British policeman to death.

There is a real difference between being kicked by a mule and reading about being kicked by a mule. We know. That is why terrorism is viewed by 91 percent of Americans as the top threat to us compared with just 64 percent in Europe. We cannot tolerate the prospect of Islamic fundamentalists getting their hands on weapons of mass destruction. They are immune to civilized political process, motivated not so much by a specific grievance as by a generalized hatred of the West. Not only are they prepared to commit suicide in service of their hatred; they have no bases or cities or assets we can destroy and thereby deter them. We have to pre-empt them.

Technology of terror. This is where Saddam Hussein deserves special attention. His is a secular regime, but it shares the hatred and won't hesitate to share the technology of terror. He has used chemical weapons against his own people and his neighbors, and he is irrational in ways we cannot understand. Remember that in 1993 he tried to assassinate former President George Bush in Kuwait-even though a successful plot would have caused the American government to destroy Saddam and his regime, whatever the cost.

This is not a man who can be relied upon to make the rational calculation of a chess player. This is a reckless gambler but one cunning and resourceful enough to pass on WMD, including ultimately nuclear weapons, so that they would not bear his fingerprints. This is a man who lied about having no biological-weapon capabilities in the 1990s until his son-in-law defected and disclosed the programs. This is a man who is clearly lying today when he says he destroyed these weapons and the records that described them. This is a man whose record is one of cheat and retreat, moving WMD out the back doors when the inspectors come in the front doors-as may well have happened last week when inspectors stumbled upon emptied chemical artillery warheads.

This is a man who cannot be indulged with time while he continues to use his oil moneys for murder. President Bush sees clearly that we cannot wait until the day when Saddam will be too strong to stop-as has happened in North Korea. Where would that situation be if it had been confronted sooner?

Yet too many people are still fixated on finding a smoking gun. Is there one? Even as "smoldering guns" emerge, the question misses the more crucial point. The answer is not in a detail but in a very large series of facts. Iraq is located in the midst of a region that has been a hotbed of global terrorism, including Shiite Islamists, personified by their ruling mullahs in Iran; Sunni Islamists of al Qaeda, funded primarily by Saudi Arabia; and Baathists from Iraq. They all have America in their gun sights. They would all be inspired if Saddam is allowed to flout the U.N. resolutions and erode America's credibility. They would all be less constrained if Saddam could get away with his deception. They would all be encouraged to overcome the psychological impulses not to use such weapons.

We simply cannot stand by while somebody so reckless may have the power to spread smallpox, anthrax, or ricin, say, and may soon be able to deliver some form of nuclear terror here. We must live with the fact that we are the No. 1 target in the world because we are the No. 1 country. We cannot be put in a position of having our security decided by the U.N. Security Council, some of whose members merely vote to serve their own national commercial interests, while others just blindly hope for the best.

Wishful thinking does not a policy make. We have been kicked once. We will not be kicked again-and we will not let the Security Council whistle in the dark. Hope is a good breakfast but a poor supper. We are on the midnight snack.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up


01/14/02: They should have said...
12/24/02: Who finances the fanatics?
12/19/02: Put-up or shut-up time
12/09/02: Sheep, wolves, and reality
11/21/02: Curing the uncommon cold
11/12/02: Everybody has the right to be wrong but the Dems have been abusing the privilege
11/05/02: Force vs. fanaticism
10/30/02: Land of the sinking sun
10/22/02: No more cat and mouse
10/15/02: And pigs will fly
10/07/02: A shameful contagion
09/26/02: Calling a madman's number
09/23/02: Our rainbow underclass
09/13/02: Why America must act
09/04/02: After bubbles, a double dip?
08/20/02: No time for equivocation
08/06/02: No time for politics
07/30/02: Getting off the dime
07/17/02: What scandal cannot dim
06/18/02: Time to crack down: Where is the outrage?
06/05/02: The next new thing
04/30/02: Roller-coaster nation
04/25/02: A critical tipping point
04/15/02: Israel's endgame will impact the free world
03/21/02: In the face of pure evil
03/14/02: A man on a mission
03/07/02: Land of the Sinking Sun
02/12/02: Speaking truth about energy
01/15/02: Putting our house in order
01/12/02: Talking points for 2002
12/24/01: The shape of things to come
12/11/01: Finally, a clarity of vision
12/04/01: Apocalypse now
11/26/01: The Big Apple's core
11/06/01: What it will take to win
10/22/01: Getting the mayor's message
10/08/01: A remedy for repair
10/01/01: A question of priorities
09/26/01: Our mission, our moment
09/11/01: Running the asylum
08/29/01: Hail, brave consumer
06/14/01: Blackouts --- or blackmail?
06/01/01: A time to reap --- and sow
05/25/01: A question of confidence
05/18/01: A question of confidence
05/04/01: Making the grade
04/26/01: The caribou conundrum
04/19/01: Chinese boomerang
03/27/01: The man of the moment
03/20/01: The Fed must be bold
03/15/01: Japan on the brink
03/01/01: Rethinking the next war
02/09/01: The education paradox
01/08/01: How the bottom fell out
01/03/01: Quipping in the new year
12/20/00: A time for healing
11/13/00: The need for legitimacy
10/30/00: Arafat's bloody cynicism
10/18/00: Arafat torches peace
10/03/00: A great step backward
09/08/00: The Perfect Storm
08/29/00: Don't blow the surplus
08/15/00: Voting for grown-ups
08/01/00: Arafat's lack of nerve
07/17/00: Can there be a new peace between old enemies? Or will new enemies regress to an old state of war?
07/11/00: A time to celebrate
06/19/00: A bit of straight talk
06/08/00: Using hate against Israel
05/26/00: Is the Federal Reserve trigger-happy?
04/18/00: Tensions on the 'Net
04/13/00: A paranoid power
03/10/00: Fuel prices in the red zone
02/25/00: Web wake-up call
02/18/00: Back to the future
01/21/00: Whistling while we work
01/11/00: Loose lips, fast quips
12/23/99: The times of our lives
12/14/99: Hey, big spender
11/18/99: Fountain of Youth
11/04/99: An impossible partner
10/14/99: A nation divided
10/05/99: India at center stage
09/21/99: Along with good cops, we need a better probation system
09/08/99: Though plundered and confused, Russia can solve its problems
08/31/99: The military should spend more on forces and less on facilities
08/05/99: Squandering the surplus
07/06/99: More than ever, America's unique promise is a reality
06/24/99: The time has come to hit the brakes on affirmative action
06/15/99: America should take pride in honoring its responsibilities
06/02/99: The Middle Kingdom shows its antagonistic side
05/11/99: Technology's transforming power is giving a lift to everything
05/04/99: The big game gets bigger
04/30/99: On Kosovo, Russia talked loudly and carried a small stick
04/21/99: No time to go wobbly
04/13/99: The Evil of two lessers

© 2001, Mortimer Zuckerman