Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Dec. 26, 2000 / 29 Kislev, 5761

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

When laws replace common sense -- A SPREADING American mentality -- aversion to common sense -- recently entrapped the French Fry Felon. Traveling home from junior high school one afternoon, Ansche Hedgepeth, 12, was nabbed in an undercover D.C. police crackdown on snacking on the subway. She was handcuffed and her shoelaces taken away, lest . . .

Instead of being dropped from her double-dutch jump-rope team, as might have happened to a more hardened criminal, she was sentenced to undergo counseling. Transit police, dismissing criticism that the handcuffing was a bit much, say the policy regarding illicit snacking is zero tolerance.

In suburban Atlanta, Ashley Smith, 11, was suspended because she came to school with her keys attached to her Tweety Bird wallet by a thin 10-inch chain. Chains are banned under the school's zero-tolerance policy regarding "weapons." Under similar policies, four New Jersey kindergarteners received three-day suspensions for "shooting" each other with their fingers pointed as guns. Elementary school children have been suspended for possession of nail clippers.

These are examples of "the rise of antisocial law," the subject of essayist Jonathan Rauch's recent lecture at the American Enterprise Institute. There are, he argues, two dramatically different mechanisms for averting and resolving conflicts. One, which he calls Hidden Law, is communitarian and informal. The other he calls Bureaucratic Legalism, which provides due process for every problem, and that is a problem. Both have proper spheres, but Bureaucratic Legalism is metastasizing dangerously, crushing Hidden Law, on which privacy and civilized life generally depend.

Hidden Law consists of unwritten social codes. The breakdown of one such -- the rule that a man had to marry a woman he got pregnant -- may be, Rauch says, "the most far-reaching social change of our era." Some elements of Hidden Law are what Rauch calls "craftily balanced regimes of hypocrisy." Love may make the world go 'round, but a kind of hypocrisy -- call it the Higher Hypocrisy -- lubricates the rotation.

Doctors, consulting with patients or families or both, have always quietly helped hopeless sufferers die. "It all worked," Rauch says, "because, formally speaking, nothing ever happened but a natural death. There were significant looks, knowing nods, whispered hallway conversations. . . . Everyone involved knew what had happened, and everyone also knew the importance of pretending that nothing had happened." Now Bureaucratic Legalism is beginning to crowd out Hidden Law. Society is codifying assisted suicide. Is this is an improvement?

Time was, Hidden Law helped regulate pornography. It was sold in out-of-the-way places -- say, down by Skid Row -- everyone knew where it was, everyone pretended not to see it, randy boys got ahold of it, adults pretended to believe that the boys didn't. Says Rauch: "The requirement that porn stay where you could plausibly claim never to see it amounted to a social truce. Libertines agreed not to confront bluenoses with smut, and, in exchange, bluenoses promised not to go digging around in the affairs of libertines. Of course, both parties, if you had asked them, would have vigorously denied that there was any such deal. That was why it worked." Bureaucratic Legalism has long since supplanted Hidden Law, elevating access to pornography to a constitutional right. Progress?

Universities used to have unwritten speech codes. There were insults and epithets, hurled in anger or drunkenness, followed by apologies, sincere or hypocritical. Everyone knew who was occasionally angry and who was habitually obnoxious, and campuses were generally civil and relaxed. What looked like doing nothing actually did something ameliorative. Now there is Bureaucratic Legalism -- written codes against "discriminatory verbal conduct," an offense that triggers interminable investigations, sometimes court proceedings (which discourage apologies that acknowledge guilt), severe disciplines, campus uproars, lasting bitterness.

In a dense and diverse society, Rauch says, moral disputes and collisions of clashing sensibilities are incessant. But civilized life depends on informal rules and measures -- social winks, so to speak -- preventing such mundane conflicts from becoming legal extravaganzas or occasions for moral exhibitionism. Otherwise communities become neurotic, quick to take offense, slow to assuage it. One sound of such a society is the "snap" of handcuffs being placed on a 12-year-old subway snacker.

In a Santa Fe, N.M., park, a fountain portrays a boy and girl playing, she aiming a garden hose at him, he aiming a squirt gun at her. The sculptor is going to make the boy a new hand, holding a hose. In its Baltimore headquarters, the Associated Black Charities is vexed by a proposed mural depicting Harriet Tubman holding a musket. Zero tolerance for guns. Zero common sense.

"Police! Drop the fries and no one gets hurt."

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


12/21/00: Beware the 'Bipartisanship'
12/18/00: ... A Brief Moment
12/13/00: Judicial activism on trial
12/11/00: Truth optional
12/06/00: A Chastened Court
12/01/00: Counting on some slippery language
11/28/00: Florida's rogue court
11/27/00: This willful court
11/22/00: Ferocity gap
11/17/00: Slow-motion larceny
11/13/00: Gore, Hungry for Power
11/09/00: No, the System Worked
11/06/00: The case for Bush
11/03/00: The Framers' Electoral wisdom
10/30/00: Political astronomy
10/27/00: Candidates condescending
10/23/00: No Partners For Peace
10/20/00: Talking peace with thugs
10/11/00: A feast of retreats
10/10/00: .. And what's gotten into the Danes?
10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group