Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review May 30, 2000 / 25 Iyar, 5760

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Suddenly Social Security -- SUDDENLY, THIS PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN is larger than Bill Clinton's mini-presidency, which has reached the 89th of its 96 months without seriously attempting to meet the principal domestic challenge of its era, entitlement reform. Suddenly, Social Security, the biggest and most popular program of big government--the program that calls the country's bluff, proving that although Americans praise Jeffersonian minimalism in government, they demand a large, active, ameliorative Hamiltonian government--is the great issue in this election.

George W. Bush made it so with his decision to propose allowing Americans to devote a small portion, perhaps one-sixth, of their payroll taxes to personal retirement accounts invested in some well-established stock and bond funds. Because the crisis of the system, although predictable, is not imminent, dealing with Social Security's future just now is optional and potentially hazardous, politically. Therefore Bush is demonstrating leadership. He also is plucking up a banner from some Democratic senators.

It will be many years (how many depends on the economy's performance) before the imbalance between Social Security revenues (produced by a declining ratio of workers to retirees) and promised benefits becomes acute. There can be three ingredients to a solution--cutting benefits, raising payroll taxes (close to 80 percent of Americans already pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes) and causing retirement resources to grow faster than they do under the current Social Security system.

This third is the core of Bush's solution. Al Gore's proposal is to increase benefits (for working mothers who take time off to raise children) in the near term, and in the longer term--here Gore's plan is a more radical departure from Social Security's premises than Bush's is--to turn Social Security into a welfare program by large infusions of general revenues.

Gore says Bush's plan would put retirement resources horribly at risk. Gore compares participation in the stock market to rolling "dice" or playing "roulette" in a "casino." His rhetoric radiates fear and incomprehension of one of America's central economic institutions, by which capital is raised and allocated to productive uses.

Gore's rhetoric has about it the ring of the '90s--the 1890s, when Wall Street was feared and demonized. Today polls show that the only age cohort opposed to some modest diversion of payroll taxes to personal retirement accounts is Americans over 70. And among voters under 35, there is support of landslide proportions. If Gore does not understand why, he evidently missed the 1990s. Writing in National Review, Ramesh Ponnuru notes that in 1989, a high priority of the new Republican president, George Bush, was a cut in the capital gains tax. He could not get it. In 1997, a Democratic president signed a capital gains tax cut. What had changed? A number of things, but most important was the process that produced this number: Between 1989 and 1997, more than 25 million additional Americans became owners of stocks.

Democracies make difficult decisions under the lash of necessity. Americans radically changed the role of the central government in the 1930s not because they read John Maynard Keynes's "The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money," but because a large event--the Great Depression--frightened them. Sixty years ago this month, the British, having consigned Churchill to the wilderness for years, brought him to power only because German forces were rampant across the English Channel. In the 1960s, America came to grips with its racial problem because it had to--as a result of civil, and uncivil, disobedience, it could no longer have a comfortable conscience or domestic tranquility.

No comparable exigency compelled Bush to put Social Security reform at the center of the campaign. But, then, considerations of equity are a kind of exigency. Personal retirement accounts would be sound social policy even if Social Security's condition were not actuarially ominous. Such accounts are implements whereby people of modest means can, over a 45-year working life (about average), with the help of what Keynes called "the magic of compound interest," build wealth.

Two years ago two Democratic senators singularly informed about Social Security, New York's Pat Moynihan and Nebraska's Bob Kerrey, proposed that employees be allowed to put approximately one-sixth their payroll taxes into personal savings accounts. According to Moynihan, a worker who spent 45 years at Bethlehem Steel "could easily find himself with an estate of half a million dollars."

This speaks volumes about the recent transformation of American politics: It is the Republican presidential candidate, a conservative, not the Democratic candidate with labor's backing, who is embracing Social Security, the central program of the welfare state, as a vehicle for advancing an egalitarian agenda.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group