Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 3, 2000 / 30 Sivan, 5760

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Recalling the Revolution -- BENJAMIN MARTIN, a South Carolina widower with seven children, is haunted by memories of his complicity in an atrocity in the French and Indian War, and so in 1776 opposes war against the British. If war comes, he warns, it will not be on the frontier or distant battlefields, it will be "amongst us." It was.

America's second civil war, 1861-65, has, as it should, an unshakable hold on America's imagination. Not so America's first civil war, which is what the Revolutionary War was--an internecine conflict that sometimes turned on the hardihood of small numbers of men, sometimes in (more or less) well-regulated militias, who helped keep British forces so embattled in the South, they could not move north against Gen. Washington.

We who think the American Revolution was mankind's finest moment, and that the British have not yet apologized enough for the Stamp Act, this week received a delight from an unlikely source. Just in time for Independence Day, Hollywood, which is not famous for flag-waving, has given us "The Patriot," a movie about the bloody business that turned American independence from an aspiration into a fact.

Mel Gibson plays Benjamin Martin (based loosely on Francis Marion, South Carolina's "Swamp Fox"). Gibson found a large audience for "Braveheart," his movie about 13th-century Scottish nationalism, and "The Patriot" is "Braveheart" to the tune of "Yankee Doodle." The mayhem--including a memorable decapitation by a cannonball--is considerable. And as he was when playing Scotland's William Wallace, Gibson is handy with a hatchet.

Gibson's British nemesis, Col. Tavington, is based on a real British officer, Lt. Col. Tarleton, known as "the Butcher." The war really was nasty, brutish and long. Especially in the South, it featured guerrilla tactics by the American rebels and disregard of the rules of war by the British, who considered the conflict a compound of war and treason, and by militias loyal to the British.

"The Patriot" comes at a time when American history is being made accessible and entertaining in movies and novels. "The Patriot" does for the Revolutionary War what "Glory" (1989) did for the Civil War. Jeff Shaara's novels "Gods and Generals" and "The Last Full Measure" tell the story of the Civil War before and after Gettysburg, which was the subject of his father's classic, "The Killer Angels." This spring Shaara published "Gone for Soldiers," a novel about the war with Mexico, which stoked the nation-shattering debate about the expansion of slavery and was a rehearsal for young officers such as Lee, Grant, Longstreet, Pickett and others. And this August Max Byrd, whose novels "Jefferson" and "Jackson" are better history than some biographies of those men, publishes "Grant."

Much of this popular history is, like "The Patriot," an antidote to a recurring misinterpretation of the American experience--our supposed "loss of innocence." American innocence was supposedly lost during the Spanish-American War. Or the First World War. Or the Depression. Or Vietnam. Or Watergate. What nonsense.

"The Patriot" is pertinent. If by "innocence" is meant ignorance of the toll history takes on idealism, or of the fact that "hero" is not a synonym for "saint," any American innocence (John Adams, an innocent? Madison? Washington? Franklin?) disappeared as the nation was being born.

Why is the Revolutionary War so eclipsed in America's memory by the Civil War? Partly because in Lincoln and Lee the Civil War produced figures more empathetic and tragic than George Washington as mummified by many historians. Also, the Civil War produced songs we still sing, presidential rhetoric we still recite, battles we still analyze and soldiers' letters we still read. Lost is the romance of the Revolution, which was one of history's close calls.

Even without the victory, such as it was, at Gettysburg, the Union probably would have survived. But were it not for the fortunate fog that made possible the Revolutionary War's Dunkirk--the evacuation of Washington's army from Brooklyn, across the East River--the war might have ended in 1776. And without the 1777 victory won by just 13,000 Americans at Saratoga, arguably the most important battle in American history, there probably would have been no Yorktown four years later.

For more than a century we have been plied and belabored with theories purporting to explain history in terms of rival inevitabilities, of the inexorable working out of this or that iron law of history's unfolding. Revisiting the Revolutionary War is a bracing reminder that the fate of a continent, and the shape of the modern world, turned on the free choices of remarkably few Americans defying an empire.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group