Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 10, 2000 / 11 Tishrei, 5761

George Will

George Will
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

... And what's gotten into the Danes? -- THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, which is both pathetic and hilarious in its lust for "relevance," has taken to praying for the European Union. Anglican services, reports Peter Hitchens in the Spectator, now involve worshipers in asking G-d to give "vision, understanding and integrity" to the leaders of European institutions. Those leaders probably are praying for a flood to inundate the Danish peninsula to punish inhabitants for their recent impertinence.

Major political actions can issue from a melange of motives, as did Denmark's decision against adopting the European common currency, the euro. The 53.1 to 46.9 vote reflected, in part, fear that joining might eventually lead to Denmark's being compelled to lower taxes.

Danes are intensely proud of their welfare state. Seventy-one percent of Danish women have jobs, the second-highest percentage of any nation (Sweden is higher), and many of the jobs are in the welfare state. Women voted heavily against the euro. They worry that "harmonization," which is Eurospeak for minimizing national differences in domestic policies, might require Denmark to reduce financing of social services.

Furthermore, the European Central Bank favors lower taxes and fewer regulations to stimulate economic growth. However, the question is not whether Denmark is right in favoring high taxes (68 percent top income-tax rate, a 25 percent value-added tax) but whether it has a right to do what it wants.

Denmark, a nation of 5.3 million, may have spoken for a majority of the 375 million people in the 15 EU nations. Denmark is the first nation in which the people have been allowed directly to decide on adopting the euro. It probably will be the last for some time. Sweden and Britain, the only other EU members that have not adopted the euro, were tiptoeing toward referendums. However, because most members of Europe's political, business and media elites strongly favor ever more integration, they will not risk rejections.

But Britain's next general election, which could come as early as next May and must come by May 2002, may become, in effect, a referendum on the EU as a threat to British sovereignty and self-determination. Prime Minister Tony Blair's views about the EU are characteristically blurry. By saying there are five economic tests that must be met before Britain will adopt the euro, Blair feeds the meretricious fiction that only economic, not political--indeed, constitutional--arrangements are at issue.

The views of the Conservative Party leader, William Hague, are clear. He regards the common currency as the thin end of a potentially enormous wedge, dividing the British people from their tradition of parliamentary supremacy. A recent poll showed 70 percent of the British, including a majority of Labor Party supporters, oppose the euro.

German voters would reject the euro if given a chance, according to polls taken before Denmark showed that rejection is not followed by heavens falling. Also before Denmark voted, Ireland's arts minister, Sile de Valera, granddaughter of one of the founding fathers of the Irish republic, said the EU's incorrigible bossiness, its unending blizzard of fiats and regulations, is threatening "our identity, culture and traditions." This, even though Ireland has received $28 billion in aid from the EU since joining it in 1973. Perhaps nations respond to prosperity--Ireland's economy is the fastest-growing in the EU--by giving higher priority to noneconomic values.

The fact that Denmark's currency is already linked to the euro, and hence Denmark's latitude in setting monetary policy is severely circumscribed by the European Central Bank, makes the "no" vote more rather than less significant. The vote was not only against making the existing monetary arrangements irrevocable, it was against the EU's political pretensions, one manifestation of which is the idea, emanating from Germany, that Britain and France should turn over to the EU their permanent seats on the U.N. Security Council.

In the end, Denmark's pro-euro campaign was reduced to trotting out a popular movie producer, who sounded like Rodney King, saying people should vote "yes" because it is nice for European nations "to get along." Indeed it is. However, across Europe, the popular impulse is against centralization and toward devolution--a sometimes disintegrative impulse that threatens the integrity of the nation state.

In France, where centralization is a civic religion, Paris is contemplating increased autonomy for Corsica to dampen disorderly demands for it. And since the creation of legislatures of Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, the Church of England's services, as trendy as they are sparsely attended, include prayers for "the parliaments"--plural--"in these lands"--plural.

Against both centrifugal and centripetal forces, Denmark has asserted the value of self-determination in a framework of nationhood. Democracy is in Denmark's debt.

Comment on JWR contributor George Will's column by clicking here.


10/05/00: The Agony of Debate
10/02/00: Senate Canvas
09/28/00: Milosevic: Not Another Saddam
09/25/00: Blaming the Voters
09/22/00: Saying No to the Euro
09/18/00: Farewell, Mr. Moynihan
09/14/00: When 'Choice' Rules
09/12/00: Colombia Illusions
09/08/00: Will He Spend It All?
09/04/00: Back in the U.S.S.R.
08/31/00: Stonewalling School Reform
08/28/00: Uphill for a California Republican
08/24/00: Sauerkraut Ice Cream
08/21/00: The Partial-Birth Censors
08/18/00: A Party to Prosperity
08/14/00: The National Scold on the Stump
08/10/00: The Thinking Person's Choice
08/07/00: The GOP of Powell And Rice
08/03/00: Panic in the Gore Camp
07/27/00: . . . Both Radical and Reassuring
07/06/00: Harry Potter: A Wizard's Return
07/03/00: Recalling the Revolution
06/29/00: An Act of Judicial Infamy
06/26/00: Life, Liberty and ... the Pursuit of Foxes
06/21/00: Fumble on Prayer
06/19/00: The unified field theory of culture
06/15/00: Schools Beset by Lawyers And Shrinks
06/12/00: Missile Defense Charade
06/07/00: The Grandparent Dissent
06/05/00: Liberal Condescension
06/01/00: Great Awakenings
05/30/00: Suddenly Social Security
05/25/00: Forget Values, Let's Talk Virtues
05/22/00: AlGore the Hysteric
05/15/00: Majestic Avenue
05/11/00: Just How Irrational Is the Exuberance?
05/08/00: Home-Run Glut
05/04/00: A Lesson Plan for Gore
05/01/00: The Hijacking of the Primaries
04/28/00: The Raid in Little Havana
04/24/00: Tinkering Again
04/17/00: A Judgment Against Hate
04/13/00: Tech- Stock Joy Ride
04/10/00: What the bobos are buying
04/06/00: A must-read horror book
04/03/00: 'Improving' the Bill of Rights
03/30/00: Sleaze, The Sequel
03/27/00: How new 'rights' will destroy freedom
03/23/00: Death and the Liveliest Writing
03/20/00: Powell is Dubyah's best bet
03/16/00: Free to Be Politically Intense
03/13/00: Runnin', Gunnin' and Gambling
03/09/00: And Now Back to Republican Business
03/06/00: As the Clock Runs Out on Bradley
03/02/00: Island of Equal Protection
02/28/00: . . . The Right Response
02/24/00: Federal Swelling
02/22/00: Greenspan Tweaks
02/17/00: Crucial Carolina (and Montana and . . .)
02/10/00: McCain's Distortions
02/10/00: The Disciplining of Austria
02/07/00: Free to Speak, Free to Give
02/02/00: Conservatives in a Changing Market
01/31/00: America's true unity day
01/27/00: For the Voter Who Can't Be Bothered
01/25/00: The FBI and the golden age of child pornography
01/20/00: Scruples and Science
01/18/00: Bradley: Better for What Ails Us
01/13/00: O'Brian Rules the Waves
01/10/00: Patron of the boom
01/06/00: In Cactus Jack's Footsteps
01/03/00: The long year
12/31/99: A Stark Perspective On a Radical Century
12/20/99: Soldiers' Snapshots of the Hell They Created
12/16/99: Star-Crossed Banner
12/13/99: Hubert Humphrey Wannabe
12/09/99: Stupidity in Seattle
12/06/99: Bradley's most important vote
12/03/99: Boys will be boys --- or you can always drug 'em
12/01/99: Confidence in the Gore Camp
11/29/99: Busing's End
11/22/99: When We Enjoyed Politics
11/18/99: Ever the Global Gloomster
11/15/99: The Politics of Sanctimony
11/10/99: Risks of Restraining
11/08/99: Willie Brown Besieged
11/04/99: One-House Town
11/01/99: Crack and Cant
10/28/99: Tax Break for the Yachting Class
10/25/99: Ready for The Big Leagues?
10/21/99: Where honor and responsibility still exist
10/18/99: Is Free Speech Only for the Media?
10/14/99: A Beguiling Amateur
10/11/99: Money in Politics: Where's the Problem?
10/08/99: Soft Thinking On Soft Money

© 2000, Washington Post Writer's Group