Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 23, 2001 / 28 Adar, 5761

Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Hollywood's high on action films, for global market success -- THE Oscars ... ugh.

For the last two months we've been treated to a steady stream of awards shows, Golden Globes, People's Choice, the Foreign Critics Who Hate America but Love to Live Here Honors, etc. All of these pageants are designed to contribute to, or feed off of, Oscar hype.

Woops, I'm sorry, I mean Oscar(R) Hype.(TM)

Nothing's necessarily wrong with a little mass-market buzz-mongering. But much of the oooing and ahhhing over the dresses and the misty-eyed musings over the nature of one's "craft" tend to obscure the fact that, if done properly, the whole show could run a half-hour - credits and opening monologue included.

But, all the hype misleads in another way. The Oscars are the face that Hollywood wants America to see. This is the profile that blends glamour, style and art with easily digested social consciousness.

Movie stars love to have the world think they are very serious people who, had they not chosen acting as a profession, would otherwise be employed as senators, novelists, civil rights leaders or renowned environmentalists. So they wear 50-cent ribbons on $10,000 tuxedos and testify before the world how much they care about sea turtles, sweatshops or the plight of puppies without good homes.

But behind the testimonials and the tears there's an industry-wide trend that Hollywood doesn't want you to think about. And the best example of that trend is this year's only heavily nominated movie not made in Hollywood.

"Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" is the most successful subtitled foreign film in American history. Its legions of critical fans say this is because director Ang Lee masterfully blends all the elements of epic film-making while remaining true to Oriental aesthetics - or something like that.

Salman Rushdie recently wrote in The New York Times that "Crouching Tiger" represents a real threat from a new generation of foreign filmmakers to Hollywood's "stranglehold" on the global movie market. And, yeah sure, it is a beautifully made movie. But it's also a kung-fu movie.

And for all the talk of how "Crouching Tiger" is a breakthrough film for Eastern filmmakers, let no one doubt that if Ang Lee had crafted a Chinese "My Dinner With André" or "The Big Chill," complete with subtitles, nobody in America would have watched it.

For years, Europeans - most notably the French - have argued that the American movie industry gained global dominance because of two things: bigger markets and better marketing. They whine that our domestic market is so huge, Hollywood can make a bigger profit and afford to spend more on marketing, crowding out smaller foreign flicks.

Relatedly, they point out that our country is so diverse that we've figured out how to make movies that appeal to the broadest possible audience. French films about chance encounters in used bookstores don't make sense to everybody, but everyone "gets" American movies about cowboys and Indians.

For the last decade Hollywood has been applying that lesson more and more to the new global market. Making lavish movies high on action, violence and sex and low on dialogue and acting has been the secret to Hollywood's success in the global market for at least a decade.

This fact is often lost on social conservatives long convinced that Hollywood movies are lewd, crass and liberal because Hollywood is full of lewd and crass liberals. And while there's some merit to that argument, the reality is that making violent movies makes sense as a business decision because audiences around the world understand violence more than they understand obscure cultural references.

For example, "Home Alone" was one of the most popular films in Turkish history, and men all around the world understand what's going on in a Three Stooges movie. But diverse populations would probably need to have "All the President's Men" explained to them.

As the barriers between global markets come down and the incentives for global marketing strategies increase, it's only more and more likely that the universal language of sex and violence will gain more currency. There are no more "ancillary markets;" there is now just one market, and sometimes this will mean that Hollywood cares less about what America wants and more about what can be comprehended by people in any corner of the globe.

So in this sense, "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" and "Gladiator," discussed by critics as being diametrically opposite films, are in fact two sides of the same coin. "Gladiator" is doing well around the globe, no doubt often with subtitles, because it is an epic action film that transports the audience to another time.

"Crouching Tiger" is doing well here in America because it does the exact same thing.

To comment on JWR contributor Jonah Goldberg's column click here.


03/21/01: Republicans should be cautious of 'compassionate conservatism'
03/19/01: "Traffic" moves propaganda into drug-policy debate
03/15/01: Appeal of 'Sopranos' lies in strict code of honor
03/09/01: Organic claims are cleverly written fiction
03/07/01: Snow job: There the media go again
03/02/01: It's a vision thing
02/28/01: SAT is best measure of general aptitude
02/26/01: Easing the estate tax
02/23/01: Clinton defenders finally admit to his power abuses
02/21/01: Failed dot-coms missed rules of the marketplace
02/15/01: Clinton heeds my Harlem advice
02/12/01: Harlem could be Bill's best move yet
02/06/01: Lying, betrayal essential parts of journalism
01/18/01: How to polarize candidates
01/15/01: Dems never tire of using 'race card'
01/11/01: Taking the celebrity out of politics
01/08/01: Unfairly 'borking' Ashcroft
01/04/01: Want to be more efficient? Increase number of politicians
01/02/01: Whole lotta exploitin' goin' on
12/28/00: Hypocrisy police pounce on Clinton book deal
12/26/00: Sometimes, it's good to be a Grinch
12/21/00: Though symbolic, Bush's diversity sends a message
12/19/00: Gore concedes --- but why did it take so long?
12/14/00: Is 'Queer as Folk' what we asked for?
12/11/00: Election mess hardly a 'civics lesson'
12/07/00: Clinton's tacky legacy
12/05/00: Marriage civilizes the manly beast
11/30/00: Gore's speech more pompous posturing
11/28/00: Rabble-rousing Dems act irresponsibly
11/27/00: Duking it out with democracy
11/16/00: Issues irrelevant to most voters
11/14/00: Gore's us-vs.-them campaign
11/10/00: Dot-com disasters missing brand-name success
11/06/00: Conventional wisdom turns with the polls
11/03/00: Clinton photo, appropriately, hits below the belt
11/01/00: Electoral college ensures democracy
10/30/00: New Yorkers, media letting Hillary off the hook
10/23/00: Gore needs to put first things first
10/20/00: Treatment of Farrakhan glosses over odd issues
10/16/00: Secrets of election can be found in 'Star Trek'
10/12/00: Arafat hardly 'provoked' into violence
10/10/00: Undecided voters may be ignorant, not discriminating
10/06/00: The importance of character isn't debatable
10/03/00: Conservatives are the true friends of science You know why?
09/29/00: Symbolic 'born alive' vote makes sense
09/25/00: Conservatives adopt abandoned liberalism
09/21/00: Ventura's media backpedaling makes fiction of his new book
09/18/00: Tough questions target Hillary Clinton's elitism
09/14/00: Hollywood morality to blame
09/11/00: Specifically, AlGore's detailed plan is meaningless
09/07/00: Time-honored tradition: Insult the press
09/05/00: Scouting out justice
08/30/00: The ADL's historical revisionism
08/28/00: Sitcoms will survive, post-"Survivor"
08/24/00: Candidates' choice of movies shows refreshing honesty
08/21/00: An AlGore victory? Only if dead birds fly
08/17/00: AlGore is doomed, but Dems ignore warning signs
08/15/00: Proud and true: He's a Jew
08/10/00: Exploiting religion would be tragic mistake
08/08/00: Cheney serves up tempting appetizer
08/03/00: Republicans now 'nice,' media still nasty
08/01/00: Presidential campaign could use some anti-metric mania
07/27/00: Government shouldn't subsidize Reform Party
07/25/00: Campaign finance 'reform' gives too much power to liberal media
07/20/00: Hillary slur speaks volumes
07/18/00: AlGore's McCarthyism
07/11/00: 'Survivor' shows hypocrisy of animal rights groups
07/05/00: McDonald's deserves a break today
07/03/00: On July Fourth, time to reflect on America's founding
06/28/00: America bashing becomes international pastime
06/23/00: If Fonda is sorry, let her say so
06/06/00: NAPSTER exposes artists' hypocrisy
04/18/00: Not much difference between TV journalists, TV actors

© 2000, TMS