Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 10, 2000 / 11 Tishrei, 5761

Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Undecided voters may be ignorant, not discriminating -- SAY YOU'RE SHOPPING for a new family vehicle. You're torn between buying a Volvo station wagon and a rusty toy wagon pulled by a three-legged pig.

On the one hand, the Volvo is expensive, while the pig-wagon is quite affordable. The Volvo requires a lot of upkeep, including gas, tags, title, an expensive mechanic and relatively high insurance.

With the pig wagon, as long as you keep a low profile, you don't need tags or title; you can feed it leftovers and, worst-case scenario, you can eat it if it keeps breaking down. On the other hand, a three-legged pig pulling a wagon doesn't make the commute any easier.

I bring this up for a reason; just because you're undecided between two options doesn't mean you're not a moron. And yet, in American politics today, we are constantly told that the most discriminating, intelligent, pragmatic voters are the undecideds, the independents, the middle-of-the-roaders.

Why? Is there a rule that says that not being able to easily choose one party or another is a sign of intelligence? Are "independent" positions on Medicare somehow more legitimate than positions reached by political parties?

I should be clear, I am not saying that Al Gore or George W. Bush are the political equivalent of even a four- legged pig wagon. This has nothing to do with Democrat vs. Republican or liberal vs.

conservative. Whatever your ideology, it's clear that the differences between Bush and Gore are dramatic, at least on most of the issues voters consider important.

Among pundits, activists, political consultants and every other kind of American cursed with the political-junkie bug, the consensus is that this election poses the clearest choice between candidates since Ronald Reagan ran against Jimmy Carter in 1980.

As E.J. Dionne, an astute and liberal student of American politics, writes in The Washington Post, "Whatever their weakness, Bush and Gore deserve credit for giving us an election in which basic disputes that have ravaged American politics for two decades might come close to settlement."

And yet this is the tightest election since 1960, with the most volatile undecided electorate since at least then. The reality is that most undecideds aren't undecided because Gore or Bush haven't provided enough information or because the choice isn't clear enough.

These people can't make up their minds, in all likelihood, because either they don't care or they don't know anything. If they don't care, that's fine. They just shouldn't vote. In my book, not voting is the only honorable choice if you don't care about politics enough to stay informed.

But if these undecided voters don't know anything, why imbue them with any great nobility or intelligence? When I talk to students on college campuses, many of them boast of their independence and inability to make a decision. "I can't tell the difference between the Democrats and Republicans," they say, like wine connoisseurs dismissing ripple and Zima.

Admittedly some of the students who can't tell the difference are actually informed. But invariably these students are supporters of Ralph Nader or, more rarely, Pat Buchanan. Of course, if you go far enough into outer space you can be forgiven for thinking the Earth and Mars are close together, but that doesn't mean they are.

Still, far more often these students can't tell the difference between the two major parties because they don't want to try.

More telling, if you watch the insipid focus groups on the news networks - especially after the presidential debates - you will see "average Americans" talking about the election with a tone normally reserved for snooty judges in cooking contests. Hmm, I'd like to see a pinch more on taxes. Or, how about a soupcon on trade? An extra helping of education giveaways? In response, the interviewers nod solemnly at the wisdom of the vox populi.

There's nothing wrong with people tuning into the campaign late and needing to be brought up to speed. But we don't think people who walk in half way through the movie know what's going on more than those who've been there since the beginning. And we don't expect students who missed two-thirds of math class to be better at long division than those who took notes.

By all means, let's get these latecomers up to speed on what's at stake in this election and what the differences are. Let's just not put them on a pedestal in the process.

As they said in "Spinal Tap," there's a fine line between clever and stupid. Well there's also a fine line between discriminating and ignorant.

To comment on JWR contributor Jonah Goldberg's column click here.


10/06/00: The importance of character isn't debatable
10/03/00: Conservatives are the true friends of science You know why?
09/29/00: Symbolic 'born alive' vote makes sense
09/25/00: Conservatives adopt abandoned liberalism
09/21/00: Ventura's media backpedaling makes fiction of his new book
09/18/00: Tough questions target Hillary Clinton's elitism
09/14/00: Hollywood morality to blame
09/11/00: Specifically, AlGore's detailed plan is meaningless
09/07/00: Time-honored tradition: Insult the press
09/05/00: Scouting out justice
08/30/00: The ADL's historical revisionism
08/28/00: Sitcoms will survive, post-"Survivor"
08/24/00: Candidates' choice of movies shows refreshing honesty
08/21/00: An AlGore victory? Only if dead birds fly
08/17/00: AlGore is doomed, but Dems ignore warning signs
08/15/00: Proud and true: He's a Jew
08/10/00: Exploiting religion would be tragic mistake
08/08/00: Cheney serves up tempting appetizer
08/03/00: Republicans now 'nice,' media still nasty
08/01/00: Presidential campaign could use some anti-metric mania
07/27/00: Government shouldn't subsidize Reform Party
07/25/00: Campaign finance 'reform' gives too much power to liberal media
07/20/00: Hillary slur speaks volumes
07/18/00: AlGore's McCarthyism
07/11/00: 'Survivor' shows hypocrisy of animal rights groups
07/05/00: McDonald's deserves a break today
07/03/00: On July Fourth, time to reflect on America's founding
06/28/00: America bashing becomes international pastime
06/23/00: If Fonda is sorry, let her say so
06/06/00: NAPSTER exposes artists' hypocrisy
04/18/00: Not much difference between TV journalists, TV actors

© 2000, TMS