Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 14, 2000 / 16 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761

Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Gore's us-vs.-them campaign

http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- IT'S QUITE POSSIBLE that our long national nightmare has only just begun. The decision of the Gore campaign to fight it out tooth and nail raises the prospect that the presidency will not be decided for weeks or maybe months.

In what must be the front-runner for political chutzpah of the millennium award, Gore campaign chairman William Daley called the Florida election, "an injustice unparalleled in our history." This from the man whose father, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, had a famously Soviet attitude toward election returns. Even if all the accusations about the Florida vote are true, they pale in comparison to the Democratic chicanery in 1960.

Nonetheless, William Daley's rhetorical flourish is clearly intended toward another end: to pave the way for a protracted Clintonian legal and political ground war. While there appear to be some legitimate technical legal issues in Florida, the reality - as everyone knows - is that there are legitimate legal and technical issues in every state in the country, in every election.

In America, defendants are not guaranteed a perfect trial, they are promised a fair one. The same holds true for elections. No election can be perfect (for some strange reason), but they can be fair.

Democrats bemoan the unfairness of the fact that some 19,000 ballots were discarded in Palm Beach County, Fla., because they were "double punched." This sounds like an outrage, until you realize that this happens routinely. In 1996, an election with lower turnout, some 14,000 ballots were discarded in the county for the exact same reason.

Meanwhile, Florida Representative Joe Scarborough contends that up to 10,000 predominantly Republican voters walked away from the polls in the Florida panhandle (a GOP stronghold) after the news networks prematurely called the state for Gore. That isn't fair either.

Such Monday-morning quarterbacking could be applied to Gore touchdowns in a half-dozen states with close results. (Gore's margin of victory in Iowa was less than 5,000 votes; in Wisconsin, where the Democrats distributed cigarettes to homeless people in return for votes, it was less than 6,000.) In a sense, it is entirely artificial to say that the national election hangs on Florida. It should hang on every state that would or could tip the balance in the Electoral College.

In his press conference, Daley remarked that he "hadn't heard" of voting irregularities as egregious as Florida's in other states. His ignorance could possibly be explained by the fact that Florida has been dissected by an army of reporters and lawyers - or because his campaign benefited from such shenanigans. Were an equally potent army of snoops to be dropped into his home state of Illinois, does anyone doubt that "disturbing" irregularities might surface? Indeed, his own base of operations, Cook County, Ill., uses a similar "butterfly ballot," which he contends is at the heart of "an injustice unparalleled in our history."

It is an underdiscussed embarrassment of this great democracy that every state regularly throws out ballots, confuses voters and the rest. Indeed, one wonders how comfortable the Democrats are in their belief that the next president of the United States should be decided almost entirely by Democratic voters too stupid or enfeebled to decipher a ballot selected by a Democratic supervisor that more than 100,000 other Democrats had no trouble using this year.

Gore's political strategy is to exploit the fact that he maintains a lead in the popular vote so he can wage an extended legal fight. But that popular-vote lead may prove illusory. It has already dropped to around 100,000, as of this writing. Nationally, there are more than a total of 2 million popular votes yet to be tallied, including quite possibly over a million absentee and overseas ballots and tens of thousands of regular ballots from counties (in Washington State, New Mexico and elsewhere) that historically lean Republican.

Moreover, many states, like New York, do not count some absentee ballots if there is no chance of them affecting the electoral vote results. Now, as a Constitutionalist and therefore an Electoral-College loyalist, I don't care all that much about the popular vote. But it does provide a legitimate political argument for dragging out the fight for Florida in the courts and on TV.

Which is exactly what Gore is doing. Indeed, it seems his campaign has borrowed a page from the Clinton-Lewinsky playbook. While Al Gore postures amid the clouds, his surrogates run a door-to-door ground war marked by bad faith, demagoguery and passive-aggressive legal maneuvering designed to run out the clock in their favor. How else to explain Jesse Jackson's relentlessly shameful mau-mauing over the "disproportionate disenfranchisement" of blacks? This may be a winning political strategy, for now.

But one thing is abundantly clear: Throughout Gore's us-vs.-them campaign, he promised to fight for those who saw their interests aligned with his campaign - and only them. In this sense, Gore has managed to fulfil his first presidential campaign promise. Let us hope it is the last, as well.



To comment on JWR contributor Jonah Goldberg's column click here.

Up


11/10/00: Dot-com disasters missing brand-name success
11/06/00: Conventional wisdom turns with the polls
11/03/00: Clinton photo, appropriately, hits below the belt
11/01/00: Electoral college ensures democracy
10/30/00: New Yorkers, media letting Hillary off the hook
10/23/00: Gore needs to put first things first
10/20/00: Treatment of Farrakhan glosses over odd issues
10/16/00: Secrets of election can be found in 'Star Trek'
10/12/00: Arafat hardly 'provoked' into violence
10/10/00: Undecided voters may be ignorant, not discriminating
10/06/00: The importance of character isn't debatable
10/03/00: Conservatives are the true friends of science You know why?
09/29/00: Symbolic 'born alive' vote makes sense
09/25/00: Conservatives adopt abandoned liberalism
09/21/00: Ventura's media backpedaling makes fiction of his new book
09/18/00: Tough questions target Hillary Clinton's elitism
09/14/00: Hollywood morality to blame
09/11/00: Specifically, AlGore's detailed plan is meaningless
09/07/00: Time-honored tradition: Insult the press
09/05/00: Scouting out justice
08/30/00: The ADL's historical revisionism
08/28/00: Sitcoms will survive, post-"Survivor"
08/24/00: Candidates' choice of movies shows refreshing honesty
08/21/00: An AlGore victory? Only if dead birds fly
08/17/00: AlGore is doomed, but Dems ignore warning signs
08/15/00: Proud and true: He's a Jew
08/10/00: Exploiting religion would be tragic mistake
08/08/00: Cheney serves up tempting appetizer
08/03/00: Republicans now 'nice,' media still nasty
08/01/00: Presidential campaign could use some anti-metric mania
07/27/00: Government shouldn't subsidize Reform Party
07/25/00: Campaign finance 'reform' gives too much power to liberal media
07/20/00: Hillary slur speaks volumes
07/18/00: AlGore's McCarthyism
07/11/00: 'Survivor' shows hypocrisy of animal rights groups
07/05/00: McDonald's deserves a break today
07/03/00: On July Fourth, time to reflect on America's founding
06/28/00: America bashing becomes international pastime
06/23/00: If Fonda is sorry, let her say so
06/06/00: NAPSTER exposes artists' hypocrisy
04/18/00: Not much difference between TV journalists, TV actors

© 2000, TMS