Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 15, 2001 / 20 Teves, 5761

Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Dems never tire of using 'race card' -- ONE DOWN, two to go. The efforts to wallop George Bush's conservative nominees for his Cabinet continues. Linda Chavez has withdrawn. Attorney General nominee John Ashcroft has been in a swarming dog fight almost since the day he was named. But things are only now getting heavy for Gale Norton, whom George W. Bush has tapped to run the interior department. Again, it looks like the old rule of thumb for the Democratic left still applies, "When in doubt play the race card."

The case in point is the brewing hoopla over Norton's 1996 speech to the libertarian Independent Institute. Addressing the issues of federalism and states' rights, Norton invoked the Civil War, which was, of course, the touchstone event in the history of states' rights; the federal government forced individual states, at gunpoint, to change their ways.

"We certainly had bad facts in that case where we were defending state sovereignty by defending slavery," she said. "But we lost too much. We lost the idea that the states were to stand against the federal government gaining too much power over our lives."

According to The Washington Post, environmental groups charge that her comments "indicated a lack of sensitivity to the horror of slavery and represented a troubling view of the role of the federal government in protecting the environment."

In commenting on Norton's remarks, Kenneth A. Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, seemed to relish the opportunity to use the racial cudgel against the interior secretary-designate. "Her deeply divisive remarks suggest she lacks a vital instinct to protect what needs protecting, whether it's wilderness or the rights of people of color." I guess this means that you can't be an environmentalist and a racist at the same time.

The Washington Post story effortlessly segues from Norton's comments to controversial observations that Ashcroft made to a neoconfederate magazine about how various Southern Civil War heroes were "patriots." The effect is to make it sound as if Norton is nostalgic for the days of chattel slavery.

Thus is just another example of how liberal groups cannot make an effective appeal without calling their opponents racist. It's a dead certainty that some Democratic senator will ask Norton, in gravely concerned tones, "Ms. Norton, do you consider the historic evil of slavery to be just so many inconvenient 'bad facts'? What do you mean 'lost too much'?"

Her answer should be the obvious one. Of course it was imperative to defeat slavery - that is, after all, what the Republican Party was founded on. But that doesn't mean every by-product of the Civil War was positive.

Which brings us to Norton's phrase "bad facts," which is being taken to be a trivialization of the moral horror of slavery. The reality is quite different. "Bad facts" is a common legalism among conservative economists and lawyers. It simply means that reality can provide an example that undermines the efficacy of a principle. For instance, Britney Spears is a "bad fact" to the idea that talent is important to success. Life causes problems for theories all the time.

As a conservative, I'm disappointed that the notion of states' rights was permanently entangled with race in a way that makes no logical sense if you can overlook the history, i.e. "bad facts," of slavery. Leftists should also bemoan the discrediting of Southern anti-capitalism and anti-industrialism. Those traditions were steamrolled onto the ash heap of history by the Civil War even more than states' rights were.

On paper, states' rights and racism are apples and oranges. In principle, the federal government could easily have been pro-slavery, and the abolitionist states could have been the ones seeking to break away from tyrannical system that respected human bondage. Consider the histories of Germany, France, Russia, Cambodia, China and much of Africa. Centralized governments tend to be the enemies of freedom, while countries that respect local autonomy and self-government are more likely to respect civil liberties.

Of course, we all know it didn't work out that way in America. Here, a good system, our federal republic, was used to defend the evil practice of slavery. The question is, how long will we denounce the idea that states can run their own affairs because of a vile exception to the general rule of American decency?

And for how much longer will we insist on demonizing and vilifying anyone who mentions the words "states' rights" without first swearing they're not a racist.

To comment on JWR contributor Jonah Goldberg's column click here.


01/11/01: Taking the celebrity out of politics
01/08/01: Unfairly 'borking' Ashcroft
01/04/01: Want to be more efficient? Increase number of politicians
01/02/01: Whole lotta exploitin' goin' on
12/28/00: Hypocrisy police pounce on Clinton book deal
12/26/00: Sometimes, it's good to be a Grinch
12/21/00: Though symbolic, Bush's diversity sends a message
12/19/00: Gore concedes --- but why did it take so long?
12/14/00: Is 'Queer as Folk' what we asked for?
12/11/00: Election mess hardly a 'civics lesson'
12/07/00: Clinton's tacky legacy
12/05/00: Marriage civilizes the manly beast
11/30/00: Gore's speech more pompous posturing
11/28/00: Rabble-rousing Dems act irresponsibly
11/27/00: Duking it out with democracy
11/16/00: Issues irrelevant to most voters
11/14/00: Gore's us-vs.-them campaign
11/10/00: Dot-com disasters missing brand-name success
11/06/00: Conventional wisdom turns with the polls
11/03/00: Clinton photo, appropriately, hits below the belt
11/01/00: Electoral college ensures democracy
10/30/00: New Yorkers, media letting Hillary off the hook
10/23/00: Gore needs to put first things first
10/20/00: Treatment of Farrakhan glosses over odd issues
10/16/00: Secrets of election can be found in 'Star Trek'
10/12/00: Arafat hardly 'provoked' into violence
10/10/00: Undecided voters may be ignorant, not discriminating
10/06/00: The importance of character isn't debatable
10/03/00: Conservatives are the true friends of science You know why?
09/29/00: Symbolic 'born alive' vote makes sense
09/25/00: Conservatives adopt abandoned liberalism
09/21/00: Ventura's media backpedaling makes fiction of his new book
09/18/00: Tough questions target Hillary Clinton's elitism
09/14/00: Hollywood morality to blame
09/11/00: Specifically, AlGore's detailed plan is meaningless
09/07/00: Time-honored tradition: Insult the press
09/05/00: Scouting out justice
08/30/00: The ADL's historical revisionism
08/28/00: Sitcoms will survive, post-"Survivor"
08/24/00: Candidates' choice of movies shows refreshing honesty
08/21/00: An AlGore victory? Only if dead birds fly
08/17/00: AlGore is doomed, but Dems ignore warning signs
08/15/00: Proud and true: He's a Jew
08/10/00: Exploiting religion would be tragic mistake
08/08/00: Cheney serves up tempting appetizer
08/03/00: Republicans now 'nice,' media still nasty
08/01/00: Presidential campaign could use some anti-metric mania
07/27/00: Government shouldn't subsidize Reform Party
07/25/00: Campaign finance 'reform' gives too much power to liberal media
07/20/00: Hillary slur speaks volumes
07/18/00: AlGore's McCarthyism
07/11/00: 'Survivor' shows hypocrisy of animal rights groups
07/05/00: McDonald's deserves a break today
07/03/00: On July Fourth, time to reflect on America's founding
06/28/00: America bashing becomes international pastime
06/23/00: If Fonda is sorry, let her say so
06/06/00: NAPSTER exposes artists' hypocrisy
04/18/00: Not much difference between TV journalists, TV actors

© 2000, TMS