' Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 19, 2002 /9 Tamuz, 5762

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Inviting losses on two fronts

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | In the months that have followed the murderous attacks launched on September 11th, President Bush has repeatedly, and correctly, emphasized that the war on terror must be fought both at home and abroad. He has recently underscored his determination to make advances on these two fronts by creating a real capability for homeland defense and by adopting, where necessary, preemptive measures against our enemies overseas.

Unfortunately, Mr. Bush's efforts on the home front and abroad are in danger of being significantly undermined by actions expected to occur this week.

Damage may be done here at home on June 28th, when FBI Director Robert Mueller is scheduled to address the annual convention of the American Muslim Council (AMC). He is evidently doing so because -- as Mr. Mueller's spokesman put it last week -- the FBI believes the AMC to be "the most mainstream Muslim group in the United States."

Talk about intelligence failures! As Steven Emerson, one of the Nation's foremost authorities on Islamist organizations and their activities in the United States, has noted in his new book "American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us,": "The AMC is a founder, corporate parent and supporter of several militant Islamic groups...." In particular, Mr. Mueller should be aware that, in Emerson's words, "The AMC has routinely featured or honored Islamic militants or supporters of terrorism at its annual conferences."

Mr. Emerson quotes a former AMC president and Board of Directors chairman, Nazir Khaja, as saying: "No one in the organization really knows 'where the funds for AMC are coming from, how are they being raised and spent, and who is controlling the whole process." Khaja suggests the man in control is the AMC's Secretary, Abdulrahman al-Amoudi, an individual who publically declared in October 2000 that he is a supporter of both Hamas and Hizbullah.

Arguably worst of all, confusing organizations like the AMC with "mainstream" Muslims -- let alone dignifying the former by affording them repeated access not only to the FBI Director but to the President and his Cabinet -- serves to legitimate the radicals while disenfranchising those who genuinely adhere to moderate Islamic teachings. Why would the FBI want in this way to advance the AMC agenda, which Emerson says includes "aggressively attack[ing] Sheikh Muhammed Hisham Kabbani, a leading moderate voice in the American Muslim community"?

With respect to the war on terror overseas, President Bush himself is being encouraged to unveil this week an initiative that will likely prove even more problematic than the Mueller outreach to the AMC. Some expect Mr. Bush to endorse a new U.S. Mideast peace plan built around the idea of a "provisional" Palestinian state. While it is unclear exactly what the term "provisional" would mean in this context, its implications are unmistakeable:

1) Despite well-deserved castigation of Yasser Arafat's kleptocracy by the President and, most recently, by his National Security Advisor, Condaleezza Rice, under present circumstances any interim state would, as a practical matter, have to be built on the foundation of Arafat's Palestinian Authority (PA). The growing chorus of calls for real "reform" in the PA would be undermined. Arafat would be rewarded yet again for his misconduct. And terrorist violence against Israel would continue to be seen as producing results -- an inducement for more terrorism.

2) To the extent any geographic dimensions of this "provisional state" are recognized (and that would appear the bare minimum such recognition would require), Israel's efforts to defend itself against terror emanating from Palestinian-controlled areas -- a right President Bush has repeatedly affirmed -- would inevitably be, to put it mildly, complicated: Should Israel have to traverse internationally recognized borders to root out terrorist infrastructures, it would risk not only virulent foreign condemnation but the creation of a casus belli with the Arab world.

3) The danger of such a war will only grow insofar as there is seen to be significant daylight between the United States and Israel. Since Prime Minister Sharon has already rejected the "provisional state" idea (as have Palestinian spokesmen), a Bush initiative along these lines will appear, at best a non-starter; at worst, it will reignite hopes among the Arabs that their ambition to destroy Israel may yet be achievable if the Jewish State becomes estranged from the U.S.

In this regard it is instructive to recall what Arafat told Jordanian television on September 13th, the same day he signed the Oslo accord on the lawn of White House: "Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish a sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel."

The Bush Administration need not inflict such reverses upon its own war efforts at home and abroad. After all, Director Mueller can simply cancel his ill-advised appearance at the American Muslim Council convention. He should nonetheless ensure that there is an FBI presence there -- albeit for the purpose of putting under surveillance what promises largely to be yet another AMC event sympathetic to those who are our Islamist enemies in the war on terror.

For his part, Mr. Bush should eschew seductive appeals to reward terrorists in the Middle East by embracing even more of a proto-Palestinian state than Arafat has ruled since 1993. He can, instead insist -- as Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle suggested on Sunday -- on "regime change" in the Palestinian Authority as well as Iraq, establishing such a step along with democratic institution-building and other reforms as preconditions to further progress towards the creation of a Palestinian state with whom Israel, and the rest of us, can safely live.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. heads the Center for Security Policy. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


06/12/02: Make missile defense happen
06/04/02: The next 'Day of Infamy'?
05/29/02: Bush's Russian gamble
05/21/02: The 'next war'
05/15/02: Ex-presidential misconduct
05/07/02: When 'what if' is no game
05/02/02: Careful what we wish for
04/24/02: The real 'root cause' of terror
04/02/02: First principles in the Mideast
03/26/02: 'Renounce this map'
03/20/02: The inconvenient ally
03/12/02: Adults address the 'unthinkable'
03/05/02: The Saudi scam
02/26/02: Rumsfeld's 'now hear this'
02/19/02: Where's the outrage?
02/12/02: Post-mortem on 'Pearl Harbor II'
02/05/02: Spinning on the 'Evil Axis'
01/29/02: A challenge for the history books
01/22/02: Who pulled the plug on the Chinese 'bugs'?
01/15/02: No 'need to know'
01/08/02: Sentenced to de-nuclearize?
12/18/01: Missile defense mismanagement?
12/11/01: Is the Cold War 'over'?
12/04/01: A moment for truth
11/29/01: Send in the marines -- with the planes they need
11/27/01: 'Now Hear This': Does the President Mean What He Says?
11/20/01: Mideast 'vision thing'
11/13/01: The leitmotif of the next three days
11/06/01: Bush's Reykjavik Moment
10/30/01: Say it ain't true, 'W.
10/23/01: Getting history, and the future, right
10/16/01: Farewell to arms control
10/05/01: A time to choose
09/25/01: Don't drink the 'lemonade'
09/11/01: Sudan envoy an exercise in futility?
09/05/01: Strategy of a thousand cuts
08/28/01: Rummy's back
08/21/01: Prepare for 'two wars'
08/14/01: Why does the Bush Administration make a moral equivalence between terrorist attacks and Israel's restrained defensive responses?
08/07/01: A New bipartisanship in security policy?
07/31/01: Don't go there
07/17/01: The 'end of the beginning'
07/10/01: Testing President Bush
07/03/01: Market transparency works
06/27/01: Which Bush will it be on missile defense?
06/19/01: Don't politicize military matters
06/05/01: It's called leadership
06/05/01: With friends like these ...
05/31/01: Which way on missile defense?
05/23/01: Pearl Harbor, all over again
05/15/01: A tale of two Horatios
05/08/01: The real debate about missile defense
04/24/01: Sell aegis ships to Taiwan
04/17/01: The 'hi-tech for China' bill
04/10/01: Deal on China's hostages -- then what?
04/03/01: Defense fire sale redux
03/28/01: The defense we need
03/21/01: Critical mass
03/13/01: The Bush doctrine
03/08/01: Self-Deterred from Defending America
02/27/01: Truth and consequences for Saddam
02/21/01: Defense fire sale
02/13/01: Dubya's Marshall Plan
02/05/01: Doing the right thing on an 'Arab-Arab dispute'
01/30/01: The missile defense decision
01/23/01: The Osprey as Phoenix
01/17/01: Clinton's Parting Shot at Religious Freedom
01/09/01: Wake-up call on space
01/02/01: Secretary Rumsfeld
12/27/00: Redefining our Ukraine policy
12/19/00: Deploy missile defense now
12/12/00: Sabotaging space power
12/05/00: Preempting Bush
11/28/00: What Clinton hath wrought
11/21/00: HE'S BAAAACK
11/14/00: The world won't wait

© 2001, Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.